LewsTherin said:
And maybe the U.S. will qualify for the rugby world cup next year, and join the ranks of countries who play
real sports
While I respect the notion that Rugby is somehow the more
manly sport because the players don't have the good sense to put on armor, in my view that seems to inherently limit what can happen in the game. Bravado aside, without all those silly pads one could not expect to regularly deliver and recive the sort of impacts that are common in the NFL without burning through the talent pool at an alarming rate.
That said, Rugby IS more entertaining than soccer simply because at least blood is drawn and nobody stops the game on account of a tantrum unless there is an obvious shattered bone or ruptured organ.
Of course, the US participates in most sports at some level or another - it just happens that Basketball, Baseball, Racing and Football are so overwhelmingly popular that they dominate the mindshare. I myself participate in Fencing at the University level. I know plenty of people who play soccer regularly. I'm told that somewhere people play LaCross and row boats. I'm nearly certain that if there is an athletic contest with accepted rules and regulations, you'll find some portion of the American population regularly participates. It just doesn't rise to any sort of stature. Fencing for example will never be a popular spectator sport in the US because it is virtually impossible for the uninformed to follow and even if you know precisely what's going on, it isn't terribly exciting to watch.