I was extremely surprised that the US was even playing in the world cup. When they tied England, I nearly shat myself.
South Korea vs Greece 2-0DeathChairOfHell said:anyone else noticed that every match so far has ended in a tie?
Despite the fact that they were on at different times?AkJay said:Don't know really, I'm assuming England will prevail. I actually watched Doctor Who instead... it was a good episode...
Ahhhh, and suddenly it all becomes clear!The_root_of_all_evil said:Iplayer, dear boySquid94 said:Even though the coverage of the match was after Dr. Who?AkJay said:Don't know really, I'm assuming England will prevail. I actually watched Doctor Who instead... it was a good episode...![]()
Is it bad that as an Englishmen I am sorely tempted to do the same? It's not hatred of my own country as such, it's just when you get people getting so cocky about something they have absolutely no control over I find it very amusing when they get taken down a peg or two.Volucer said:As a Scot the result has had me with a permanent smile on my face, helping to rub it in to everybody who thought England would pummel the US. It's just grand.
Ah, the New York Post. I advise my British friends to treat that... "newspaper" as the U.S. version of the Sun, and give it the same credibility.Ickorus said:I don't know about you guys but I found this picture to be both depressing and hilarious at the same time:
![]()
When did a draw automatically mean america wins?
Not to you personally, but to all the dildos who are talking about how they were on at different times, I'M AMERICAN. I TORRENTED THE EPISODE AND WATCHED IT DURING THE FOOTBALL GAME. FUCK.Roaminthecrimesolvingpaladin said:Despite the fact that they were on at different times?AkJay said:Don't know really, I'm assuming England will prevail. I actually watched Doctor Who instead... it was a good episode...
And meh, despite being English I have a rooted dislike of the team (Except Robert Green), and my allegiances have been shifted due to a sweep-stake. I still can't believe I got Switzerland and Serbia
It was luck. What do you want him to say when something was luck? The word "luck" was created to describe moments of such good fortune.Littlee300 said:Seriously? Someone whining, when the opposing team does better by saying "it was luck!" It is so annoying...
You said it yourself, the goal was a fluke... you didnt deserve it.rt052192 said:the entire match he whined about how the US didn't deserve to even be tied with God's gift to the soccer world: England. Announcers are supposed to be objective if it's broadcasted on a national level. Had it been a British announcer in England he can say whatever, but he was completely biased towards england and gave no credit to the fact that the US actually played alright whereas England played like shit. He was a terrible announcer and whined and complained the entire match, but what else can one expect from the Brits?Kinguendo said:No, he was going by the facts (and facts have the annoying tendancy of being biased toward the truth)... England are a better team. You said it yourself... the only goal you got was because of major fluke and America was playing well. So America was playing well and England was playing poorly, you only got a goal from a fluke... and America didnt win. So how was the announcer being arrogant? He was doing his job by making the assumptions he made, he couldnt have expected that goal to go in... you cant predict luck, so minusing the luck factor from the game it would have ended 1-0 to England. He did his job to the best of his ability, dont get pissy because he didnt side with your team and couldnt see how luck was on your side for this match.rt052192 said:Hellyeah the US tied England and as an American I am pumped. Granted the goal was a major fluke, but the US played well enough. For all of those who watched the match on ABC the British announcer was a biased, arrogant ass. Take that!
But burgers taste better than crumpets.Kinguendo said:You said it yourself, the goal was a fluke... you didnt deserve it.rt052192 said:the entire match he whined about how the US didn't deserve to even be tied with God's gift to the soccer world: England. Announcers are supposed to be objective if it's broadcasted on a national level. Had it been a British announcer in England he can say whatever, but he was completely biased towards england and gave no credit to the fact that the US actually played alright whereas England played like shit. He was a terrible announcer and whined and complained the entire match, but what else can one expect from the Brits?
And what was that last sentence? I couldnt hear your stereotyping for all the burgers you stuffed into your mouth.
Heskey shouldn't be allowed to touch a football in my opinion. Everything he does seems so negative. he hasn't even scored since February. They're using him to hold the ball up to support Rooney, that's something Zamora does well, and he has a rocket of a finish on him, but he gets overlooked due to Tottenham ruining his career by stealing him from us when he wasn't ready to make the step up.ChromeAlchemist said:Every person I know who loves and knows their football made that assumption it seems, and underestimated them along with everyone else. Regardless, if we kept that mistake of a goal out, sure they could have still scored as they are a good team, but 1-0 seemed likely, especially considering the way both sides played in the second half. England shouldn't have gotten so lax after they scored, but still.
And I still don't understand why Defoe wasn't on instead of Heskey, and Crouch earlier than he got on. It made no sense in a 1-1 situation of that calibre.
Well, Bunker Hill was a battle between some bitter British people standing on a hill with shitty weapons and more British people running directly towards them. Noone really won, just a lot of people died on both sides. More people died on the British British side because they were attacking. A quick game of TF2 would prove that's always the case. Imagine Bunker Hill was the second point on Dustbowl, with 2 sentries around the base and the blue team have no medic.The_root_of_all_evil said:Didn't the British win Bunker Hill as well? Not a great win, but still 235 years ago...
If you think NA Football is boring you don't know what's going on.MiracleOfSound said:It's better than watching American Football, my god is that sport boring.spectrenihlus said:Honestly I don't understand soccer (football for you annoying non Americans =P) you play one and a half hours for 1 point? Talk about a snooze fest. That's just my opinion.
What gets me is that the games are so long but in reality there's only a few minutes of actual action, usually around 5%... it's excruciating!John Funk said:If you think NA Football is boring you don't know what's going on.MiracleOfSound said:It's better than watching American Football, my god is that sport boring.spectrenihlus said:Honestly I don't understand soccer (football for you annoying non Americans =P) you play one and a half hours for 1 point? Talk about a snooze fest. That's just my opinion.
Kinda wish I had a TV to watch the World Cup on, oh well.
Is 5% the official number? hahaMiracleOfSound said:What gets me is that the games are so long but in reality there's only a few minutes of actual action, usually around 5%... it's excruciating!John Funk said:If you think NA Football is boring you don't know what's going on.MiracleOfSound said:It's better than watching American Football, my god is that sport boring.spectrenihlus said:Honestly I don't understand soccer (football for you annoying non Americans =P) you play one and a half hours for 1 point? Talk about a snooze fest. That's just my opinion.
Kinda wish I had a TV to watch the World Cup on, oh well.
And my god, the ads... so many ads...
Can't argue there, it was a pretty terrible game. England were appaling.Low Key said:[
I could say the same thing about soccer though. I watched the highlights of the US vs. England game which took about 7 minutes. Decent action, but I imagine the other 83 were spent around midfield.
As for the ads, that's how American television works. It's not the NFL's fault.
what wrong with burgers?Kinguendo said:You said it yourself, the goal was a fluke... you didnt deserve it.rt052192 said:the entire match he whined about how the US didn't deserve to even be tied with God's gift to the soccer world: England. Announcers are supposed to be objective if it's broadcasted on a national level. Had it been a British announcer in England he can say whatever, but he was completely biased towards england and gave no credit to the fact that the US actually played alright whereas England played like shit. He was a terrible announcer and whined and complained the entire match, but what else can one expect from the Brits?Kinguendo said:No, he was going by the facts (and facts have the annoying tendancy of being biased toward the truth)... England are a better team. You said it yourself... the only goal you got was because of major fluke and America was playing well. So America was playing well and England was playing poorly, you only got a goal from a fluke... and America didnt win. So how was the announcer being arrogant? He was doing his job by making the assumptions he made, he couldnt have expected that goal to go in... you cant predict luck, so minusing the luck factor from the game it would have ended 1-0 to England. He did his job to the best of his ability, dont get pissy because he didnt side with your team and couldnt see how luck was on your side for this match.rt052192 said:Hellyeah the US tied England and as an American I am pumped. Granted the goal was a major fluke, but the US played well enough. For all of those who watched the match on ABC the British announcer was a biased, arrogant ass. Take that!
And what was that last sentence? I couldnt hear your stereotyping for all the burgers you stuffed into your mouth.