Valve: Been shooting themselves in the foot lately.

Recommended Videos

quack35

New member
Sep 1, 2008
2,197
0
0
I'm betting it won't even come out in November.

Valve is notorious for missing their deadlines.
 

Simalacrum

Resident Juggler
Apr 17, 2008
5,204
0
0
ZeroMachine said:
(which sounds like a droid from Star Wars...)
ROFLMAO!!!
I'm never gona look at that title the same way again.
Never noticed it could be interpreted as L4-D2 lol
 

sgtshock

New member
Feb 11, 2009
1,103
0
0
I do admit that Valve's made a few mistakes these past few weeks, but their far from sold out. Yeah, their new update system was convoluted, but they brought back milestones just a week or so after everyone complained. And you know what? If everyone complains that they want Ep3 over L4D2, Valve will probably get the picture and get cranking on Episode 3, maybe even release a trailer.

Making mistakes =/= selling out.
 

PirateKing

New member
Nov 19, 2008
1,256
0
0
They know what they're doing. They're Valve, one of the best game companies ever.
Just give 'em time. You'll be happy.
 

chrisw23

New member
Jun 3, 2009
91
0
0
YurdleTheTurtle said:
I think it's more likely Microsoft pushed them to announced L4D 2 so early. Correct me if I'm wrong though.
i think it was EA actualy
 

fer1wi

New member
Jun 4, 2009
213
0
0
I don't mean to sound mean (unintentional pun), nor do I hope to sound like a fanboy, because I'm not, but be happy Left 4 Dead is getting a good sequel in a short amount of time.

Left 4 Dead is an awesome game, don't get me wrong. It was really fun to kill incoming zombies running at you. (If I could only count the times I suffered at the hands of the Tank..) But I'm sick of hearing all of these complaints about the new game.

Using the boycott's manifesto as a guideline, I'll tell people why they shouldn't complain.

1) Significant content for L4D1 was promised, and never delivered.
What's content from one game compared to a whole new game from the same series made by the same developers?

2) Valve put little faith in L4D1 since they almost certainly started working on L4D2 right after release.
Most people complain about the long time it takes to make a game (ex: Duke Nukem Forever, which got cancelled) You're getting a sequel in 7 MONTHS!

3) The fact that L4D2 is nearly identical to L4D1 will decimate the community for both games.
Nearly, but not exactly, identical. Be glad Valve is not doing what Sega is. (ex: Ruining the series, like Sonic, or re-releasing the same games over and over, a-la House of the Dead series)

4) The announced date is not nearly enough time to polish content or make significant gameplay changes.
It's using the same engine as L4D. All they need is a great story, good levels, new characters, weapons, etc.

5) The new character designs seem bland and unappealing so far.
Key words: so far. All games go through development. This may be the forerunners to the actual designs. However, I do agree: the characters seem bland so far.

6) L4D2 is too colorful to fit in with L4D1's visual aesthetic.
Think of setting. L4D took place in Pennsylvania in what i assume is winter. Of course it's going to look dark. L4D2 takes place in the South, in Summer. Of course it's going to look bright.

7) The fiddle-based horde music is extremely disliked, though the differently orchestrated music is otherwise welcome.
Again, think setting. It takes place in the South. Stereotypically thought of somewhere with square-dancing, which I think has the fiddle. (I did like the original horde music, though)

8) L4D2's release will result in a drop in quality and frequency for L4D1 content, even compared to before.
Of course that's going to happen. It happens to most games, like Halo 2. When it came out, Bungie released downloadable content for it. When Halo 3 came out, Bungie released DLC for THAT, and "abandoned" Halo 2. It happens.

9) The community has lost faith in Valve's former reputation for commitment to their games post-release.
You mean to tell me that you're boycotting L4D2 for that? L4D2 ruined Valve's reputation? Not likely. Are you forgetting the other games Valve released? Left 4 Dead, the Half-Life series, Portal. Those are good games, and releasing Left 4 Dead 2 early destroyed what Valve has done? Again, not likely.

Left 4 Dead 2 will be a great game. As said on a related forum, "I hate this hate for Valve" (which is really well-written), "fanboys need something to whine about".
 

Flying Pilgrim

New member
Apr 24, 2009
365
0
0
Agiel7 said:
Sometimes, despite all the great things Valve has given us, from one of the most mod-friendly games in existence to Portal, it becomes difficult to see method in Valve's madness.

If you go back about two years ago, you can probably remember that bewildering announcment that there would no longer be a "Black Box" for all the new games for those who had already bought Half-Life 2 and Episode One. I'm surprised that there wasn't a huge back-lash to this announcement, as clearly it was Valve's way of justify making their core audience pay an extra 10 dollars for games they already had. Then this past few weeks, Valve implemented a convoluted unlock system in Team Fortress 2 that has only induced more headaches than the single class rushes that characterized previous class updates in the game.

Come E3, we expected the final installment in Valve's botched attempt at episodic content, and... hey... wait, hold on a second...

Oh... what the fuck, Valve?

Now, I'd feel a lot better about the L4D 2 announcement, had it been given at least another year, or if it was going to be part of some form of DLC. However, the thing that incensed me the most was that we've given Valve three years (remember that Episode 3 was announced to be in the works shortly after Episode 1 came out) and they've decided to already focus on something else entirely. For god's sake Valve, at least a story teaser with a flash of the G-Man's face and "Episode 3: Coming Soon" would suffice.

At this point, to say a gaming company has sold-out has become almost cliched. But unfortunately, as much as I loved the Half-Life series, there's no two ways about it this time.
This is Valve we are talking about,it took them 9 years to make TF2,and 4 years until Half-Life 2 was released.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
Halfbreed13 said:
Internet Kraken said:
AC10 said:
I'd say cause L4D is only 7 months old just jamming in new maps and new enemies into the exact same engine is basically paying for stuff that should be more considered an expansion.

Really, they didn't have to break the bank on this one and it shouldn't cost 50 dollars.
I believe they said they are making major changes to the AI director, among many other changes to the original game.

Still, I think the best way to protest this game would be to not buy it. Money speaks louder than words. Valve isn't going to stop production on this game just because some people on the internet complained about it.
over 5k people on the boycott group ^.^
Your point?

5000 people really ain't that much. Besides, I bet half those people joined right after seeing the Left 4 Dead 2 trailer, before even looking into Left 4 Dead 2.

If I've learned anything about Valve fans it's that they always complain about anything Valve does. If you don't like the game, then don't buy it. Again, money speaks louder than words. Do you really think they will just drop everything they have worked on just because some people are crying about it? It isn't that simple.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
Xbowhyena said:
It IS too early for L4D 2. No one is saying the game will be bad, it just is too early.
That doesn't make sense.

If it's just to early, then don't buy it until later on. If that's your reason then you should be glad it comes out this early. Then when you feel like buying it will be at a cheaper price.
 

Katana314

New member
Oct 4, 2007
2,299
0
0
Only thing I'm against is L4D2. As long as TF2 is still around, I'm still happy, and I'm sure Valve is still gonna do great things. I just need to be wary a bit more, I guess (not pre-purchase a game I know little about)
 

ChromeAlchemist

New member
Aug 21, 2008
5,865
0
0
This is worse than when people said that Nintendo abandoned them.It's worse because they are actually giving you more games to play and you are complaining.

Word on the street is that EA cracked the Whip on this sequel, which is why it is coming out so soon. Either way I hope it will be good. As for Episode 3, just play something else, it will come soon enough.
 

Zephirius

New member
Jul 9, 2008
523
0
0
Seriously, I don't give a shit about morons whining about betrayal because of a few minutes of pre-rendered footage, but these people going "It's Valve, they know what they're doing." just piss me off. I have liked (not loved) a couple of Valve's games, and hated a couple. Steam is the biggest pile of shit I have ever seen, and I refuse to install it on my PC. Just because they have made some good games in the past doesn't mean they will always be angelic paragons of good quality and fair business deals. Nobody knows jack shit about L4D2, I saw the trailer myself, and it barely says anything aside from that there's 4 survivors and zombies. It could be horrible, it could be great. Don't just assume that "BUT IT'S VALVE" = 100% Great quality, guaranteed.

Valve knows what they're doing? Who doesn't? Blizzard doesn't, with their countless millions/billions? EA doesn't, with their own piles of billions of dollars in big brown bags marked "$"? Microsoft (make me laugh, please)? Indie developers are the closest to not knowing what they're doing. Everyone knows what they're doing, but barely anyone can accurately predict the results, Valve is no different. The thing that makes it easier is the droves of fans equating Valve to perfection.

And this last bit is out of spite: Portal was decent!
 

Arcyde

Senior Member
Nov 16, 2008
898
0
21
Agiel7 said:
Now, I'd feel a lot better about the L4D 2 announcement, had it been given at least another year
Why wait another year when its already done?
 

NotAPie

New member
Jan 19, 2009
2,095
0
0
ZeroMachine said:
Ultrajoe said:
$20 says HL3 is complete and this L4D business is engineered to direct attention away from it. Hell, it might show up in the L4D2 box.

It's the kind of crap Valve would pull, and I would love them for it.

Still, smug bastards.
Though I assume you mean HL2 Episode 3, I've honestly been thinking the same thing. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if there was going to be "The Orange Box 2" and it would have Ep3, L4D2, Portal 2, and maybe the sequel to Minerva: Metastasis, since it's creator is now working for Valve.

Or maybe something all together new...
Well they did have a trailer for Left 4 Dead on the orange box, maybe there will be a trailer for Episode 3 on Left 4 Dead 2.

:p I'm still going to enjoy Valves games, I just want to know if they are atleast working on Episode 3.
 

Slayer_2

New member
Jul 28, 2008
2,475
0
0
to be fair though that one play through in portal is great. though i agree with the half-life thing.
Yeah, but I'm just saying that Valve isn't amazing. Portal was creative and cool though, if a little frustrating.
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
an Episode 3 teaser, at the very least, would have been very, very effective
actually nvm, it would be big with or without it being shown at E3 haha
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
Seeing as how it's Valve, it seems normal for games to take forever. Heck L4D2 almost seem like a hoax because it took Valve less then 4 years to start making it. I'll admit they implemented the new system in TF2 a bit hastily (they should have put a trading option in at the same time), but they put the achievement system back in for the whinny babies dedicated players so they can unlock them the old way. Valve has been doing okay for a while and I doubt if they're suddenly going to ruin themselves any time soon. Also, they have separate teams working on each game. *scowls at episode 3 team*
 

Johnmw

New member
Mar 19, 2009
293
0
0
darthzew said:
I'm so sick of hearing about how Valve "betrayed" everyone. I think it's cool they're updating it so soon, just as long as they have enough good ideas to make it truly better.

You haven't really seen, played, or heard too much about L4D2, so you really can't say anything other than "it seems too early". You really don't know anything. I hope to God it's amazing so all you haters will be 'pwned' by your own stubbornness. Well, and because amazing games are awesome.
Bow's to this posters corectness and then to his/her avatar. Why does eveyone complain when Valve makes a new L4D game....everyone acts like valve shat in thier face by releasing a sequal!...I don't get it.
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
Here's the question I'd like to pose about the L4D2 controversy. If the content that would be made for a sequal (meaning that we have an amount of additional content equal to or exceeding that in the orginal game) were instead offered as DLC for L4D, would people complain? If not, how about if they attached a price tag of say 20 bucks. If people still say that's all well and good, would you pay 50 bucks? 60?

It just seems that, if one is going to expend the man hours (which equate to some quantity of money I'm sure) to produce a huge amount of additional content, it is not unreasonble to expect that some sort of charge is applied. Or am I the only one who doesn't think it unfair that a company wants to charge for content above and beyond what came in the box?

Now, if I were instead downloading content that was required to resolve game bugs (and nothing mroe) for a price, then I'd certainly join the picket line.