Blitzwing said:
Venereus said:
WorldCritic said:
Just posted it on his Facebook page. Respectfully of course.
He won?t care. He was right them and he?s right now. Games aren?t art.
AHAHAHFDCASHGFGDASHGHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA? You're joking right?
Tell you what, I'll agree with you on this:
And no a label doesn't make him wrong a piece of paper doesn't make something art.
You're right. This doesn't make games an art form. Games have been an art form since pong. Ebert has been dead wrong since he posted his infamous article.
This just validates all that.
You're also wrong about the first amendment, which does protect against certain aspects.
Now tell me this: If a team of professional artists make quality art for years, collaborating with the singular goal of making a moving experience, how can the result NOT be art?
Games have always been art, and we don't need the National Endowment for the Arts to tell us what we have already known for a long time
Exactly. But the 1st amendment protection and grant money is nice. Plus the federal government now backs us up in the debate against naysayers.