http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/extra-punctuation/7473-Extra-Punctuation-Videogames-as-ArtWorldCritic said:Take that Roger Ebert.
Except now gaming can get funding from the government because it's art. So no, it's not business as usual, it's a big step forward.JediMB said:Art... is still subjective.
Business as usual.
Because art is covered by free speech. It means they won't be able to censor the medium.Cheery Lunatic said:It shouldn't even matter in the first place.
I still don't get why people care so much.
I was considering editing my post for that, but couldn't be bothered.Outright Villainy said:Except now gaming can get funding from the government because it's art. So no, it's not business as usual, it's a big step forward.JediMB said:Art... is still subjective.
Business as usual.
I'm not sure I quite understand what's going on there. As far as I can tell, this girl was trying to make soup but couldn't due to staggering ineptitude with a can opener, then smeared the soup on her shirt and delivered some lines of "dialogue" ... then started stripping but stopped half way through because no one was tipping her.Projo said:Really? Video games are "art" now? That's a step down guys, "art" is awful. Do you know what being art means? It means video games are now comparable to this:
The point is that that is considered a work of art. Artistic expression with some sort of depth and plausibility to it. The terms "art" and "work of art" are accountable for that train wreck that a room full of people considers a masterpiece, and video games are now on that level as well.Speakercone said:I'm not sure I quite understand what's going on there. As far as I can tell, this girl was trying to make soup but couldn't due to staggering ineptitude with a can opener, then smeared the soup on her shirt and delivered some lines of "dialogue" ... then started stripping but stopped half way through because no one was tipping her.
that about right or have I completely missed the point?