virginity for sale!
- Thread starter cobra_ky
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Most of the time when people tell me this they end up with some sleazeball after a 30 dollar lunch.Erana said:
I wouldn't make such a blanket statement. But I'm sure that's a good size of the cases. There have been quite a few reported cases where it was a case of infatuation where the rapist figured the person they were after wanted it and seemed to ignore all signs (even during the act) to the opposite.Yog Sothoth said:
I'm more disheartened by people like you calling anyone who dares not treat sex like the highest throne a whore or a slut or anything of the likes.Rad Dragonheart said:
Rape is likely just another issue related to experimental neurosis. Because of the disconnect between how we are supposed to view sex (as living organisms) and how we are dictated to view it (as many of the close minded 'whore shouters' are great examples of).MaxTheReaper said:
http://www.islesofscion.net/2009/02/04/experimental-neurosis/
If you are curious on what I mean, my examples aren't plentiful but reading up on the phenomena alone should help you understand what is likely one of the major contributors to situations like rape.
do you have any actual empirical evidence that porn reduces rape?
Also, yes what a sad sad world it is.
Also, yes what a sad sad world it is.
Never said you wereErana said:
. Just pointing out how much I've laughed about that line.Britney spears was offered millions of dollars by a Japanese Businessman to have sex with her.
Years later she ends up nto only getting her cooter on the internet for free but she sleeps with...Kevin Federline.
Making causal relationships about two topics like that will always be foolish.Drake the Dragonheart said:
It would be like noting that everytime there is a rape that sometime during that day the sun was out.
Thusly since that's always been the case the sun must cause rape.
I hate causal relationships because generally there are 90k other things that can explain the situation just as well (without being ridiculous like my example).
She's cute but I couldn't justify the 3.4 million dollars with a single night of naughty fun time.KeyMaster45 said:
I do have to agree with her though. Unless you are close minded about it she's not demeaning herself. Not that that comment has anything to do with your line.
In relation to your line I've met girls like her who are pretty militant about keeping their genitals on lock down
.
ಠ_ಠ This thread.
First of all, virginity doesn't exist. It's a made-up concept, the state of not having done something. It's an arbitrary intangible invented by men who were worried that their children might not be theirs.
By fretting over virginity women reinforce the idea that they're chattels whose value is determined by their value to a man, which in turn lies in their chastity. It's hardly surprising that a women's studies major who presumably spends a lot of time thinking about this stuff and what it means should decide to exploit it in a deservedly cynical way.
The bid is irrelevant until someone actually pays it, so I don't see any point in discussing the 3.7m at this point.
Third, people who consider whores 'not human' are animals.
The actual matter of the selling of sex is a morally complex issue. Some of the objections to it are based on mere envy - 'why can't they work hard for a living like me?' Well, why should they want to? Where is it written that someone being better off than you for less work means that they're cheating?
Prostitution can be psychologically harmful for a number of reasons, and those reasons vary from person to person. Ultimately as long as it's consensual it should be each person's choice who they have sex with and why. There are many far worse reasons to have sex than money, and nobody makes most of them illegal.
If you actually care about the issue I'd suggest reading Confessions of a College Callgirl [http://collegecallgirl.blogspot.com/]. The writer is intelligent and articulate, and writes lucidly about her experiences, showing us how having sex for money isn't necessarily a big deal, talking about the times she's enjoyed it, but not shying away from the harmful side of it and the sense she struggles with of her self-worth being tied up in her sexual appeal to men.
If you don't actually care about the issue and just want to spout off along the lines of "omg what a slut!" I'd suggest you shut your pie hole. Seriously.
First of all, virginity doesn't exist. It's a made-up concept, the state of not having done something. It's an arbitrary intangible invented by men who were worried that their children might not be theirs.
By fretting over virginity women reinforce the idea that they're chattels whose value is determined by their value to a man, which in turn lies in their chastity. It's hardly surprising that a women's studies major who presumably spends a lot of time thinking about this stuff and what it means should decide to exploit it in a deservedly cynical way.
The bid is irrelevant until someone actually pays it, so I don't see any point in discussing the 3.7m at this point.
Third, people who consider whores 'not human' are animals.
The actual matter of the selling of sex is a morally complex issue. Some of the objections to it are based on mere envy - 'why can't they work hard for a living like me?' Well, why should they want to? Where is it written that someone being better off than you for less work means that they're cheating?
Prostitution can be psychologically harmful for a number of reasons, and those reasons vary from person to person. Ultimately as long as it's consensual it should be each person's choice who they have sex with and why. There are many far worse reasons to have sex than money, and nobody makes most of them illegal.
If you actually care about the issue I'd suggest reading Confessions of a College Callgirl [http://collegecallgirl.blogspot.com/]. The writer is intelligent and articulate, and writes lucidly about her experiences, showing us how having sex for money isn't necessarily a big deal, talking about the times she's enjoyed it, but not shying away from the harmful side of it and the sense she struggles with of her self-worth being tied up in her sexual appeal to men.
If you don't actually care about the issue and just want to spout off along the lines of "omg what a slut!" I'd suggest you shut your pie hole. Seriously.
But then isn't morality just a made up concept in an attempt to keep everyone from murdering each other?
Most of us were simply commenting on the irony of someone going into women's studies using prostitution to pay for school. You have to admit there is irony there.
For the record though, I never said she couldn't, shouldn't or shouldn't be allowed to do this.
That and you bring up a good point. Why is it illegal to sell something that is perfectly legal to give away for free? There are worse things you can do to someone than have intercourse. Medals are handed out for spraying napalm! (rest in peace George Carlin)
Most of us were simply commenting on the irony of someone going into women's studies using prostitution to pay for school. You have to admit there is irony there.
For the record though, I never said she couldn't, shouldn't or shouldn't be allowed to do this.
That and you bring up a good point. Why is it illegal to sell something that is perfectly legal to give away for free? There are worse things you can do to someone than have intercourse. Medals are handed out for spraying napalm! (rest in peace George Carlin)