What everyone else said. Apparently the world is not mature or ready for 'recent event' games yet.
What I don't understand is why video games can't do this, yet TV's, movies, music, etc. are able to.
Last I heard, 6 Days in Fallujah as a video game was requested by the marines who were interviewed by Atomic Games. They stated it was a form of media readily available and one that they were not only interested in, but also one they regularly used.
It's too bad Konami (publisher) backed out after the backlash.
If the game turns out as they say and is shows the 'real war', without the run-and-gun style of games like CoD, then I would be perfectly fine with this - in fact, I'd encourage it. If it was an arcade style, then I could see the controversy, especially with multiplayer (encourages competition, ruins the whole point of the game, etc.)
Still, considering tragic events were easily displayed in other forms of media (ex. 9/11 movies), then why can't we get a video game that is AIMED with the same thing in mind, which is retelling the story from a solid, non-arcade-style perspective?
I suppose the world is not mature or ready for video games to become a regular media form yet. Thus, my answer will be: No, a war game based on recent events will not occur until much later. I'm sure these will be made eventually, given enough time.
Until then, we're stuck with fictional wars/settings that mimic real life events, but are able to avoid some backlash because they're not actually real.