Warhammer 40,000 To Become CGI Film

Recommended Videos

flaming_squirrel

New member
Jun 28, 2008
1,031
0
0
No more bloody SPAEC MARIENEZ! Why cant we have games / a film based around the inquisition or something funky like that?!

Marines have become so very predictable and boring..

Sebenko said:
And there are about a billion more interesting little chapters out there. Relictors, Soul drinkers, Rainbow marines...
That's more like it! If we're going to be force fed more SM crap, it may as well be the non generic ones.
My personal favourite were always relictors, had an army of them and still got the white dwarf magazines where they were first introduced somewhere about the place.
 

GloatingSwine

New member
Nov 10, 2007
4,544
0
0
flaming_squirrel said:
No more bloody SPAEC MARIENEZ! Why cant we have games / a film based around the inquisition or something funky like that?!
The more specialist you make the hero faction, the more people you will put off buying the product.

Whilst the principle audience for this will be people familiar with the universe, they are trying to reach out beyond that, and that means they concentrate on the most iconic thing in their universe, and that means Spess Mehreens.

And since they're doing Spess Mehreens, the natural choice for introducing a new audience to the concept of what one is is to use Smurfs, because they're the "default" chapter, so they have less weirdy bits to explain than other chapters.
 

GloatingSwine

New member
Nov 10, 2007
4,544
0
0
Metalhandkerchief said:
It leads me to think the board of directors at GW is both mentally stunted and an Ultramarine player.
See, the critical flaw in your assumption is believing that the directors of GW actually play any of their games at all. Hell, the last wheeze I heard was they were considering not selling hero units in stores because they don't sell very many, and you could fill that peg with a troop choice that sells more.
 

GloatingSwine

New member
Nov 10, 2007
4,544
0
0
Metalhandkerchief said:
I don't believe there is a flaw in my assumption, as all previous chairmen I know of of Games Workshop have been outspoken players of one or several of their games, before current CEO Tom Kirby.

The rest of your argument confuses me as it is random and I can't tell who you are talking to and why.
Most of the current GW upper management were imported from Boots the Chemist. They have no understanding of or interest in the game as anything other than a mover of product through stores.

The example I gave is an illustration of this, it betrays a failure to understand one of the core pillars of pretty much all of the games GW sell, which is that hero units are significant to gameplay, so everyone needs them, but because they are individual no-one needs many of them. Stop selling them in stores and you raise the barrier to entry of the game, so you'll reduce uptake.

I'm speaking here as someone who has friends who are either former or current members of the GW design studio, (my regular tabletop gaming buddy is a former editor of White Dwarf), so this isn't just internet conspiracy theory here.

Personally, I can see the current crop of upper management moving to prepaints at some point, and when that happens it's all over, the hobby lock-in is gone (many people stay with the hobby because of the effort required to collect, build, and paint models). Maybe not as quickly and spectacularly as when Rackham did the same thing, but within a couple of years the fad value will be exhausted and the old guard players won't want the new prepaints, and it will be over.
 

Chogg Van Helsing

New member
May 27, 2010
673
0
0
hmmmm

ill make a poinst syatem.

lots of blood: +7 for awesomeness
warhammer 40k universe: +6 for awesomeness
Ultramarines being centre point: -5 for being the most BORING race GW came up with
CGI: -3 coz it won't look as cool
Only orks: -2 coz orks are also quite a boring enemy and are no match for a SM...

- another 2 points coz GW chose 40k over Fantacy, i think fantacy is so much cooler tbh...

so final score? ONE!

it would attract a lot of ppl, but the label of warhammer will instantly get it shunned as a nerd thing only
 

Cab00se206

New member
Jul 9, 2008
160
0
0
You know, I really think that this will be good, and pray to God that it is so, or rather the God-Emperor. If this movie sucks I will cry tears of blood. But I am holding out hope that this will be quite good. The screenplay is being written by Dan Abnett, one of the most revered and prolific writers of Warhammer fiction, starring some serious A-list actors like Terence Stamp and John Goddamn Hurt!

If anybody can make a great 40K movie, these seem as good a team as any.
 

Cypher6

New member
Oct 21, 2010
1
0
0
My copy was ordered on announcement day.
I am looking very forward to this!
I can't help but feel this site and alot of the punters on it solicit quite a degree of contempt towards 40k...and more specifically the UMs.

Why I do agree that the UMs are getting more than their fair share of 'screen time' lately, I also agree that they are the least convoluted chapter to explore, especially considering both the movie AND Space Marine are brand new ventures into uncharted space for GW and its IP.

For both formats; it's a bloody good idea to make as potent and broad an opening impression as possible!!
Speaking as a complete Dark Angels hack, there is no better a chapter to do it than the UMs!

Ultimately, they're a means to initiate a much greater endeavour and I'm sure if they create the good impression I hope they will, we will be seeing more chapters explored in the very near future.

Cheers,
Cyph