Can't think of any ways Oblivion was better to be honest. I prefer everything in Skyrim apart from the over abundance of snow.
Instead we now have the magical sprint feature. You exhaust less stamina when you have less stuff equipped. Sure it'd be nice to have my lightening quick, spring-loaded jump Khajit back, but instead I get a skill system that doesn't break the game...Crono1973 said:- No athletics or acrobatics. Really, I want to run faster and jump further as I progress in the game.
This one I agree with. While the models were much nicer looking, Skyrim is essentially mix and match presets. Sliders would be welcomed back with open arms for more unique appearances.Crono1973 said:- The character creator is worse than the one in Oblivion (which was pretty bad too)
Vanilla Oblivion's UI was no beauty queen either. Anyone playing on PC will tell you that. In terms of horrible UI Skyrim and Oblivion are at a tie for PC players. Though I'll give it to you, Oblivion's had a much nicer aesthetic with the faded parchment look.Crono1973 said:- The UI is ugly compared to the one in Oblivion. It looks like it just has a white/gray frame.
- The UI was designed for looks (that's a failed attempt) rather than functionality. You can't sort your inventory, you can't view your character when equipping stuff.
Are you shitting me? You must have some horrible luck. Skyrim doesn't have half of the launch bugs that Oblivion had. Maybe you're forgetting that by the time Oblivion hit PS3 it already had a years worth of patches. Vanilla was practially unplayable on 360 and PC.Crono1973 said:- Oblivion performs better at it's worst than Skyrim does at it's worst, both compared on the PS3.
I think you're confusing streamlining with dumbing down. If you have the choice between three skills and one is fucking useless then it's not dumbing down if you decide to either scrap one or combine it with one of the other skillsCrono1973 said:Well, Oblivion was dumbed down compared to Morrowind and the same is true here.Joseph Harrison said:Hey I saw this exact same topic when Oblivion came out except it was how Morrowind was superior to Oblivion. Talk about an unpleasable fanbase
You should not be able to break a game that easilyCrono1973 said:They break Oblivion if you choose them as Major Skills. If they are minor skills, they are fantastic.kebab4you said:Fair points, EXCEPT for athletics & acrobatics, those broke oblivion(like Morrowind) so bad.
I must have missed the part where I said not liking the dragons was blasphemy. I thought I simply stated my opinion on the matter. Thanks for clearing that up for me.Crono1973 said:The point of this thread is that there are some things that Oblivion did better ON THE SAME HARDWARE. The UI on Skyrim looks horrible, they could have made it on the SNES with 2 colors (black and gray). The UI on Oblivion has a sort of wood grain look which is more appropriate to the time period and it's far more functional. Both UI's were consolized but they decided to make the Skyrim UI more about looks. They thought it more important that you could see a sword in 3D than being able to see your avatar or being able to sort.Instant K4rma said:So what it really comes down to is personal preference. You don't care about dragons while others, me included, love them. I guess I don't see the point of this thread in that case. If you like Oblivion over Skyrim, then play Oblivion. Case closed, I guess?Crono1973 said:I don't care and I have never cared about the inclusion of dragons. They're pretty weak anyway but let's be clear that dragons could be replaced with any other creature not present in previous TES games and I would have cared the same, none. To be even clearer, a rat is a wolf is a lion to me and a dragon is a giant is a mammoth to me. High level enemies and low level enemies are the only two types I see.Kahunaburger said:Number of dragons in Oblivion: 0
Number of dragons in Skyrim: infinity
That everyone was so hyped that there were dragons in this game, I just never understood.
I get that everyone was so excited about dragons but I don't understand why. You want dragons, they are in many other games and they have never been all that exciting. Before Skyrim came out I wasn't excited for them and now that I have fought a few, I am still not excited for them. Apparently that's blasphemy but to each his own.
And when in other fantasy games have you been able to level up a skill to outrun horses and jump over houses? Please name one. Name a game where wizards jump 190 feet in the air nothing. Can't do it can you?Crono1973 said:Yes because casting fire from the palm of your hand is realistic. Realistic arguments hold no value when talking about a fantasy game.- No athletics or acrobatics. Really? You want to be able to unrealistically jump over people? And run faster than the horses?
Useless skills that made the game wacky when leveled up. Glad they got rid of these skill, they served next to no purpose. Plus how would it work in Skyrim's perk system without it getting stupid?Crono1973 said:I have found Skyrim to be a step down from Oblivion in a few ways:
- No athletics or acrobatics. Really, I want to run faster and jump further as I progress in the game.
Thank you for being so informative of this decision. You just said it was worse and left it at that. No support, no nothing. That's like a comedian that sets up a punchline, drops the mic, and leaves. No point.- The character creator is worse than the one in Oblivion (which was pretty bad too)
It's better than looking like a cheesy fantasy print. The UI works better than the Oblivion UI in terms of functionality.- The UI is ugly compared to the one in Oblivion. It looks like it just has a white/gray frame.
Couldn't sort you stuff in Oblivion either. Also just put your stuff on and go 3rd person. Problem solved.- The UI was designed for looks (that's a failed attempt) rather than functionality. You can't sort your inventory, you can't view your character when equipping stuff.
The PS3 is the only console experiencing that so that's not a complete argument. On my PC Skyrim runs just as fine as Oblivion.- Oblivion performs better at it's worst than Skyrim does at it's worst, both compared on the PS3.
So did you play the game or are you just reading someone else's points from a different forum? Not really sure about that last part there.Well, there are a few and I know there are more because I have read about them on the Bethesda forums. What say you?
That's just saying there are more/better models (ie, more presets). That isn't saying that the actual character creator (which is a tool, not a collection of models) is better. Generally speaking, a tool with more options is superior than one with fewer options.Vanguard_Ex said:Make characters of the same race that are genuinely distinguishable from one another. Oblivion's could recolour them and all that but honestly, they all looked basically the same and facial structure for every member of each respective race looked identical. Skyrim's allows you to actually customise your character easily and coherently.Crono1973 said:Ok, what can you do in the character creator for Skyrim that you couldn't do in Oblivion?Vanguard_Ex said:Are you shitting me?
Oblivion's character creation was fucking dire, Skyrim's absolutely destroys it.
When you see a wolf, what do you do? When you see a rat, what do you do? When you see a bear, what do you do?Fawxy said:...That is one of the SINGLE saddest, most emotionally devoid things I have EVER read. You're not really a fan of video games if that is how you really feel; You're a fan of numbers, not fun.Crono1973 said:To be even clearer, a rat is a wolf is a lion to me and a dragon is a giant is a mammoth to me. High level enemies and low level enemies are the only two types I see.
And that's terrible.
OP: I've found vanilla Skyrim to be superior in every single way to vanilla Oblivion. And fuck everyone else, I like the UI.
I haven't finished the DH quest line yet, that's a little disappointing because the concept of the Night mother missing seemed interesting.lunncal said:Eh, I don't actually agree with any of those points at all. The one about performance issues on the PS3 might be true enough, but I have it on the 360 and have had no issues, so I wouldn't know.
Now... ways in which Oblivion is better than Skyrim...
Hm...
Oh! I thought the ending of the Dark Brotherhood storyline was a little weaker than in Oblivion. That's all I can come up with as of right now, but I'm sure I'll find more issues. I am only about 50 hours in, after all.
Define Troll?Syzygy23 said:OP sounds like a troll the way he continues to write off dragons as the fighting the same thing as rats or wolves.lunncal said:Eh, I don't actually agree with any of those points at all. The one about performance issues on the PS3 might be true enough, but I have it on the 360 and have had no issues, so I wouldn't know.
Now... ways in which Oblivion is better than Skyrim...
Hm...
Oh! I thought the ending of the Dark Brotherhood storyline was a little weaker than in Oblivion. That's all I can come up with as of right now, but I'm sure I'll find more issues. I am only about 50 hours in, after all.