The people who want to make a thing illegal should not be able to create policy without first proving how the thing they wish to be illegal harms THEM, the non-user.
That said, there's far more reasons... REAL reasons, that alcohol and tobacco should be ILLEGAL, and marijuana should be LEGAL.
Drunk drivers kill innocent people, second hand smoke likely kills innocent bystanders as well. Marijuana causes... lower worker productivity? The only study against pot seems to be the self-admitted laziness. If you don't live in a communist society where lowered productivity IS considered a threat to the masses, then that can NOT be used as a justifiable means to ban something that will lower production.
If you live in the USA, you can choose not to work, with no other penalty than you will most likely be broke or on the welfare system. If you live in a true communist society, you will be imprisoned and entered into forced labor. Based on those ideological differences, you would have a justification for banning cannabis if you were a member of the latter.
That said, there's far more reasons... REAL reasons, that alcohol and tobacco should be ILLEGAL, and marijuana should be LEGAL.
Drunk drivers kill innocent people, second hand smoke likely kills innocent bystanders as well. Marijuana causes... lower worker productivity? The only study against pot seems to be the self-admitted laziness. If you don't live in a communist society where lowered productivity IS considered a threat to the masses, then that can NOT be used as a justifiable means to ban something that will lower production.
If you live in the USA, you can choose not to work, with no other penalty than you will most likely be broke or on the welfare system. If you live in a true communist society, you will be imprisoned and entered into forced labor. Based on those ideological differences, you would have a justification for banning cannabis if you were a member of the latter.