Why, thank you.Ago Iterum said:Wow! At first thought, I looked at your post and saw you as just another nutjob.TaborMallory said:God is the sun. Think about it.
Then I actually thought about it. The sun is the reason we are all here, the reason we continue to live, and the reason that one day nothing will ever live again. It provides us with our life-sources, and so much more.
Wow.
Why did nobody listen to all of the sun-worshipping South American civilisations!
I use this avatar on multiple forums... Didn't know it was copywrittenBored Tomatoe said:What are you doing with Rottenbutter's avatar?iseko said:fiction
Well we can't answer the question because god isn't real. If you wan to use a theoretical answer, i would say that god is-----a jerk.Darkwolf9 said:That would be true if we weren't assuming God's existence in order to answer the question or said person would simply not answer or go with the more clever answer of "he doesn't exist so I can't answer it." See, this is why we can't have nice threads!TheDean said:Are you aware that there is a major flaw in this thread? Before we can discuss the nature of "god", we must take a step back and first consider whether or nto god is real. Then, if we establish it's existenace, we can talk about it more.Darkwolf9 said:First off I want to say this is not a post for any particular religion to argue about what idea of God is better.
There are a lot of different ideas of what God could be or look like (Flying spaghetti monster, Giant universe laying chicken). I'd like to hear what creative idea's you all can come up with.
If you can't disagree with someone and be nice about it then you shouldn't really be interacting with other people on forums or anywhere else.TheDean said:Well we can't answer the question because god isn't real. If you wan to use a theoretical answer, i would say that god is-----a jerk.Darkwolf9 said:That would be true if we weren't assuming God's existence in order to answer the question or said person would simply not answer or go with the more clever answer of "he doesn't exist so I can't answer it." See, this is why we can't have nice threads!TheDean said:Are you aware that there is a major flaw in this thread? Before we can discuss the nature of "god", we must take a step back and first consider whether or nto god is real. Then, if we establish it's existenace, we can talk about it more.Darkwolf9 said:First off I want to say this is not a post for any particular religion to argue about what idea of God is better.
There are a lot of different ideas of what God could be or look like (Flying spaghetti monster, Giant universe laying chicken). I'd like to hear what creative idea's you all can come up with.
and of course we can't have nice threads. Wouldn't ber any fun if we all just agreed with each other now would it?
TheDean said:Well we can't answer the question because god isn't real. If you wan to use a theoretical answer, i would say that god is-----a jerk.Darkwolf9 said:That would be true if we weren't assuming God's existence in order to answer the question or said person would simply not answer or go with the more clever answer of "he doesn't exist so I can't answer it." See, this is why we can't have nice threads!TheDean said:Are you aware that there is a major flaw in this thread? Before we can discuss the nature of "god", we must take a step back and first consider whether or nto god is real. Then, if we establish it's existenace, we can talk about it more.Darkwolf9 said:First off I want to say this is not a post for any particular religion to argue about what idea of God is better.
There are a lot of different ideas of what God could be or look like (Flying spaghetti monster, Giant universe laying chicken). I'd like to hear what creative idea's you all can come up with.
and of course we can't have nice threads. Wouldn't ber any fun if we all just agreed with each other now would it?
Excuse me, i can and do disagree with people and be nice. always.cuddly_tomato said:If you can't disagree with someone and be nice about it then you shouldn't really be interacting with other people on forums or anywhere else.TheDean said:Well we can't answer the question because god isn't real. If you wan to use a theoretical answer, i would say that god is-----a jerk.Darkwolf9 said:That would be true if we weren't assuming God's existence in order to answer the question or said person would simply not answer or go with the more clever answer of "he doesn't exist so I can't answer it." See, this is why we can't have nice threads!TheDean said:Are you aware that there is a major flaw in this thread? Before we can discuss the nature of "god", we must take a step back and first consider whether or nto god is real. Then, if we establish it's existenace, we can talk about it more.Darkwolf9 said:First off I want to say this is not a post for any particular religion to argue about what idea of God is better.
There are a lot of different ideas of what God could be or look like (Flying spaghetti monster, Giant universe laying chicken). I'd like to hear what creative idea's you all can come up with.
and of course we can't have nice threads. Wouldn't ber any fun if we all just agreed with each other now would it?