By nuclear technology, do you mean nuclear WEAPONRY, or literally ALL nuclear technology?Jfswift said:Nuclear technology in general.
I know you won't reply to this, but know that I agree with you.Saelune said:Religion. All of them. No single incident of death will ever do more damage than religion has. Their casualty numbers still going strong.
I think we can combine, simplify, specialize and generalize all in one go here:lSHaDoW-FoXl said:Damn, you got a lot of shit for this opinion. And you know what? I can see why you have this point of view and to a certain extent I agree. The only difference is that I don't believe religion was our biggest fail, I believe letting scripture and religion run our countries was.Saelune said:Religion. All of them. No single incident of death will ever do more damage than religion has. Their casualty numbers still going strong.
Edit: I wont bother responding anymore. I firmly stand by my view on this though. But I am being called a villian for hating something that hated me first for being different.
I am not wrong for hating murderers. I am not wrong for hating people who trample on freedom. I am not wrong for being for equal rights. Those all describe what religion often is.
And no, Im not a troll. A troll just wants to anger people. I merely want a better world.
[...]
It's been holding us back and beating us down and it still is to this very day. It isn't a coincidence that the chains that bind us get looser when religions grip on our society does as well. There is nothing wrong with religion as long as they're off in there little corner doing whatever they want with other religious people, but there's a serious problem if it is in the hands of some self righteous king or a greedy politician. And trust me, there's always going to be a self righteous king and a bunch of greedy politicians.
Atheists read the bible wrong (assuming they even read some of it), it wasn't meant to be a book of science at all, allot of the stories can be seen as merely symbolic and not literal occurrences. It was meant to teach faith through the examples it gives and PEOPLE were used to write it, they saw things happen and interpreted it in their own primitive way (it was a primitive time) and wrote it down to teach the lessons of faith, not science. Science we can pretty much figure out for ourselves. There will be plot holes, sure but that is either because we haven't studied it well or didn't make the right conclusions or simply because of the fact that the bible has been written by humans who only wrote what they saw, which left some flaws in the writing and then got further flawed when it was rewritten and reinterpreted a hundred times over and from one language to a different language each time.icame said:Really? I thought most atheists don't believe in god because of the scientific impossibilities (Not to mention plot holes the size of a battleship), in the bible, and because many of the teachings are rubbish (Ex. Homosexuality is wrong.) At least, that is why me and the atheists I know do >.> Doesn't make a heck of a lot of sense to not believe in something because a lot of people that practice a religion are ignorant.Anti Nudist Cupcake said:You...Icehearted said:I'd like to, as a former atheist, offer a thought; perhaps it is not the religion that is flawed, but those who practice it? At least, I found myself opening up to the concept once I realized it wasn't god or the church I despised, it was the people that used it to justify things like intolerance and oppression. I'm a christian, I do not hate gay people at all (some of my friends are gay), and I am not opposed to their getting married. We're not all bible thumping retards out to wag our smug fingers at people that do wrong, in fact christians aren't even really supposed to be doing that.Saelune said:Religion. All of them. No single incident of death will ever do more damage than religion has. Their casualty numbers still going strong.
Simply, my point is that maybe it's not the club, but the members, you should resent.
*soapbox ends*
It's just surprising to see anybody write that... I thought we were in a world divided between "Christians" and Atheists, Christians who throw every verse in the bible at gays or atheists and only show ignorance and hate (they are either hypocrites or morons), and athiests who believe God is rubbish simply because of the flaws of the people that worship him...
I thought someone who sees past this, someone like you, didn't exist, I was wrong thankfully.
Peace to everyone, no matter their sexual orientation or beliefs, that will be all.
![]()
I would say WW1 was a bigger fail than WW2. While the casualties were not as high in WW1, at least there was a significant change brought about by WW2 that has prevented another conflict on a similar scale since. WW1 was born out of next to nothing and achieved next to nothing. As well as this so many of the casualties in WW1 were just down to generals on all sides being mostly foppish retards, rather than that level of sacrifice actually needing to be made.jacobschndr said:I would make this a poll, but theres really too much here
This came to me from seeing a book in the store that listed the 100 greatest failures in the history of humanity. In it, number one, was World War II, and I mostly agree. With over 77 million lives lost(estimated) in the period of less than ten years as well as economic collapse, the rise of global super powers and leading into the dawn of the cold war. All because a few rotten, truely evil, SOB's wanted to change the world to better fit their view of a "perfect" world.
There were others too. Scandals, genocides, uprisings, the blood diamond confilct was what in my opinion, really, really bad.
So what epic fails do you know of? Thoughts?
NOTE: these studies were based upon loss of human life, economic and political turmoil, and the outright lack or non-exsistent source of reason of why they happened in the first place
I thought it was supposed to be a book of ultimate truths? If it is then shouldn't everything it in be correct? Shouldn't every teaching be perfect? Shouldn't there be no plot holes, and nothing that goes against the laws of our universe (Science)? If this book is so full of truth how can anything in it need reevaluation? If the rules it sets forth can simply be changed when it is required what is the point of believing in it at all, but thats just my thinking I suppose.Anti Nudist Cupcake said:Atheists read the bible wrong (assuming they even read some of it), it wasn't meant to be a book of science at all, allot of the stories can be seen as merely symbolic and not literal occurrences. It was meant to teach faith through the examples it gives and PEOPLE were used to write it, they saw things happen and interpreted it in their own primitive way (it was a primitive time) and wrote it down to teach the lessons of faith, not science. Science we can pretty much figure out for ourselves. There will be plot holes, sure but that is either because we haven't studied it well or didn't make the right conclusions or simply because of the fact that the bible has been written by humans who only wrote what they saw, which left some flaws in the writing and then got further flawed when it was rewritten and reinterpreted a hundred times over and from one language to a different language each time.icame said:Really? I thought most atheists don't believe in god because of the scientific impossibilities (Not to mention plot holes the size of a battleship), in the bible, and because many of the teachings are rubbish (Ex. Homosexuality is wrong.) At least, that is why me and the atheists I know do >.> Doesn't make a heck of a lot of sense to not believe in something because a lot of people that practice a religion are ignorant.Anti Nudist Cupcake said:You...Icehearted said:I'd like to, as a former atheist, offer a thought; perhaps it is not the religion that is flawed, but those who practice it? At least, I found myself opening up to the concept once I realized it wasn't god or the church I despised, it was the people that used it to justify things like intolerance and oppression. I'm a christian, I do not hate gay people at all (some of my friends are gay), and I am not opposed to their getting married. We're not all bible thumping retards out to wag our smug fingers at people that do wrong, in fact christians aren't even really supposed to be doing that.Saelune said:Religion. All of them. No single incident of death will ever do more damage than religion has. Their casualty numbers still going strong.
Simply, my point is that maybe it's not the club, but the members, you should resent.
*soapbox ends*
It's just surprising to see anybody write that... I thought we were in a world divided between "Christians" and Atheists, Christians who throw every verse in the bible at gays or atheists and only show ignorance and hate (they are either hypocrites or morons), and athiests who believe God is rubbish simply because of the flaws of the people that worship him...
I thought someone who sees past this, someone like you, didn't exist, I was wrong thankfully.
Peace to everyone, no matter their sexual orientation or beliefs, that will be all.
![]()
Whether or not the "homosexuality is wrong" writing was part of this series of disastrous rewritings is for the reader to decide, and whatever you decide, you can't go judging or hating others for doing something you interpreted as wrong, it's not your place to judge them, they need to sort themselves out and according to true Christian teachings (according to my opinion) you can only care for people, let God judge them. Also, you don't go to hell for being homosexual, and it is the opinion of some that the ACT of homosexual sex is the sin, not being homosexual.
I myself personally think that the scriptures on homosexuality desperately need reevaluation because the writer of one of the bible scriptures that I know of that wrote it as a sin was listing it amongst other sins and probably didn't really understand homosexuality and was threatened by it and thus interpreted it as sin.
Allot of what I say could be wrong, I'm not an expert at debating and I can't always explain things properly.
Also, you might not have a need for faith and that's fine and really not my business but this is just what I think.
One could argue that Fascism prevented inter-war Germany from descending into anarchy. But it eventually led to bloodshed anyway, because Fascism does not tolerate conflicting ideologies.Traun said:It is also a fact that religion is one of the few reasons the middle ages didn't turn into a free-for-all bloodbath. It is also the fact that Christianity and Confucianism were both used to unite a large pool of people with different ethnical-cultural backgrounds, prevent civil wars, hell, even Islam did this. It is also a fact that the Church is responsible for a large section of charities and freedom movements (the Church is, at the moment, an advocate of gender and race equality ). Almost every religion has been teaching people to be "good", not to murder, to be respectful and etc., which was the basis for Law for a great deal of human history (and is still so today). It is also a fact that it keeps helping people today ( just see how many ex-drug addicts, alcoholics and porn-stars were helped by the church).similar.squirrel said:He does have a good point. Regardless of the fact that people will kill each other anyway, a massive amount of bloodshed has been committed in the name of religion. That's not trolling. It's a fact.Traun said:We actually needed World War II, without it I dread to think what war we could have had a decade later.Cogwheel said:Honestly, for me, it's a toss-up between one of the things mentioned above, and burning down the library of Alexandria.
And I have to agree with Burning down the Library, even thinking about it makes me mad.
Saelune said:Religion. All of them. No single incident of death will ever do more damage than religion has. Their casualty numbers still going strong.![]()
But he didn't know that, he doesn't care enough to do so and most likely neither do your (assumptions). Religion has been, for the most part, uniting people, and ensuring peace. But no, most of today kids on the internet saw the words "Religion = Cursade/Jihad" and started to spew misinformation left and right. Yes, due to religion bad things have happened, but this is mostly people being people, far from the worst thing in history.
Not to mention that new archaeological evidence suggest that Temples may pre-date agriculture leading scientists to believe that the first cities may have been build on spiritual foundation
I will have to agree with you on that one.Shoggoth2588 said:http://www.cracked.com/article_18533_the-6-most-important-things-humanity-just-plain-forgot.html
This basically. It's incredible how many things humanity has just plain forgot on a collective scale. The cure for Scurvy is one of the bigger face-palms considering humanity has been a seafaring species for as long as we've been walking and talking.
Trolldor said:Not religion so much as the religious mindset, the delusional belief in a single doctrine, a single method of approaching all the world's ills. From Christianity to Socialism that wilful ignorance, the dogmatic adherence to a single mode of thought. The arrogant pretension to special privilege, to superiority, that divine mandate to rule.
The greatest crimes humanity has ever witnessed were committed by those convinced of their own righteousness.
I'd agree with both of the above, and ironically I'd say those ideas apply to many atheists as well.CrazyGirl17 said:Whenever people follow the evil whims of a person or twist religion to suit their own ends.
Examples: World War 2, Nazis, racism, terrorism, scientology, fundementalists, and the Westboro Baptist Church, to name a few.
(Look, I'm not saying I hate religion itself, just the people who ruin it for everyone else.)
Saelune said:Religion. All of them. No single incident of death will ever do more damage than religion has. Their casualty numbers still going strong.
Edit: I wont bother responding anymore. I firmly stand by my view on this though. But I am being called a villian for hating something that hated me first for being different.
I am not wrong for hating murderers. I am not wrong for hating people who trample on freedom. I am not wrong for being for equal rights. Those all describe what religion often is.
And no, Im not a troll. A troll just wants to anger people. I merely want a better world.
evilomega13 said:I'm actually going to support Saelune here, partially. Religion's caused a lot of shit.
Not saying I'm against it completely, but frankly it's probaly caused a larger kill count than any single war or disaster has.
thatcanadianguy said:i agree with you saelune. more blood has been spilled in the name of religion than any thing else in the history of mankind. mankinds ethnic and religious differences will always cause wars, because it is simply human nature to hate what is different.
also. justin beiber. epic fail right there.
Torrasque said:I'd have to say Religion.
Vegan_Doodler said:Agreed from what I can work out major Christian events (such as the crusades, Inquisitions,) have caused around 6 million deaths, that doesn?t even begin to comprehend the number of people worldwide that have died as a result of all religions. The fact that quite possibly billions of people around the world since the beginning of time have died because of bad fan fiction just pisses me of when I have people, oblivious about the violent history of their religion, preaching peace and love to me.
Stephen Rathbone said:+1 Religion.
I still cannot believe people still believe the rubbish.
It is so so obvious that it is a human creation, just look at how this "God" acts in all religious texts.
How is religion any more responsible than, say, government, the invention and development of weapons, the concept of land ownership, etc? I think when you actually go back and look at wars and disputes that were "caused" by religion you find that's it's not as simple as "you believe something different from me, so you must die". There are almost always underlying economic, historic or ethnic reasons as well.GrizzlerBorno said:I know you won't reply to this, but know that I agree with you.
It's one thing that we humans invented a bunch of arbitrary belief systems to instill ourselves with a sense of importance, and also to provide ourselves with a shoulder to cry on when the shit hits the fan......it's a COMPLETELY different thing, when we use that arbitrary belief system as justification for the slaughter of billions of people, Not to mention the fact that it's willingly used as an impediment to human progress.
So yeah, you're right, in the long run, the institutionalization of Religion has done more to harm the human race than any single war in our history.
If the bible is full of stories then couldn't the story of christ and god also be a story? ( I believe it is as I am an atheist, but I'm just asking your point of view on this.)Generic Gamer said:Actually the resurgence of fundamentalism is a fairly recent phenomenon, in the Victorian era it was quite commonly held that the Bible was largely allegory. Most famous evangelical Christian figures in the Victorian period abandoned their literalistic approach to their faith as they grew older. The fundamentalist resurgence was largely contained within a period of roughly 1890 to 1920 and was geographically localised.icame said:I also have only noticed people calling the stories metaphors only when it has been proved to either be impossible or never happened at all, but I could be wrong.
Outside of the US and the largely imaginary realm of the Internet (where fundamentalists can be conjured up as needed) Christian faith seems to largely believe that the Biblical stories are either true stories filtered through the lexicon of those who observed them or were fictional stories told to make a moral point.
EDIT: In fact I've never met anyone in the UK who believes that the Bible trumps science. Never. Oh I'm sure they exist (there's always one) but in all honesty the Internet exaggerates the evils of religion because they make a mighty fine punchbag.