What do you want IN Modern Warfare 3?

Recommended Videos

LaMer

New member
Dec 23, 2010
222
0
0
Also consider the fact that with the departure of Halo, the only rival Call of Duty has is the Battlefield series, therefore CoD will probably continue for at least another few years. Sigh..
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
Well...

1)Larger and more open maps. They did good with some maps, but those maps (Havana and Arrey for Blops) are far and few between, and the only rather good maps for sniping.

2)Inaccurate ARs at range. The fact that with a sniper rifle, a guy with a Famas can kill me from across the map in Arrey is so fucked up. I say give the assault rifles... hell, give all weapons, a limited range when in iron sights that the bullets will remain accurate, or even travel.

3)Multiple attachments. Bare with me, but I think that we should be able to have a Red-dot sight, dual mags, and a suppresser on an assault rifle at the same time. So allow for multiple attahcments (unless the noob tube is selected) and make each attachment added affect the guns ability, as having more attachments means more wieght, thus longer ADS and increase sway, which leads to...

4)Add weapon sway for ARs. Dont make it as major as for snipers, but add a little. For the heavier a weapon, more sway.

5)Remove insta-knife kills. Anyone who says they should keep this, no matter how smart or nice, is a fucking retard. The only one hit kill with a knife should be the same as in Reach, a long assassination animation (which would look cool in first person, think the knifing from Blops) that could be interrupted by another enemy teammate. and if they keep the knife, if a guy runs up to stab you, have a ability to counter this and reverse kill that fucker.

6)No controlable killstreaks, like AC130, Chopper gunner, or Hind.

7)This is something that I thought would be cool, but have a forth Perk category, called eqiupment perks. Choose one of these to get a piece of eqiupment. So you would chose the GL perk and get a undermount grenade launcher, or something like that.

8)keep the primary perk affecting your characters apperance, so keep that and expand on it, with the secondary and tertiary perks as well.

9)you can carry up to three weapons in SP and MP, think like MoH, where you have two guns and the sidearm. But in MP, you can only go out twith a primary weapon and a sidearm.

Thats all I can think of for now...
 

superbleeder12

agamersperspective.com
Oct 13, 2007
864
0
0
WanderingFool said:
2)Inaccurate ARs at range. The fact that with a sniper rifle, a guy with a Famas can kill me from across the map in Arrey is so fucked up. I say give the assault rifles... hell, give all weapons, a limited range when in iron sights that the bullets will remain accurate, or even travel.
That's not the way guns work. bullets don't just stop mid flight. I'd advise adding bullet drop at range.

Personally, I won't buy the next CoD game if the FAMAS isn't 3 shot burst, or have the option.
 

Vault boy Eddie

New member
Feb 18, 2009
1,800
0
0
I want a proper beta test. Couldn't even play Black Ops on PC for the first month thanks to those dickheads.
 

MrJKapowey

New member
Oct 31, 2010
1,669
0
0
Renamedsin said:
In Modern warfare 3, I would really like an offical apology from the manifacturer due to the poor quallity of previous games as well as my money back, perhaps a trip to hawaii as compensation for actually being forced to play trough the previous games.
What? They forced you to play it? If I was that annoyed by the game I would take back, get most of the money back AND get a major discount on a newer game (remember kids, Gamestation is better than GAME! I joke.) You chose to play it so you can't complain.


kman123 said:
I didn't HATE the campaign...maybe if it had a little more cohesion I would like it. It didn't feel very connected.
An ending...like an ACTUAL ending. Not this cliffhanger bullshit.
Yeah, with the stories converging they should begin to tie up their own Loose Ends. Rangers attack Russia in revenge assault. Remnants of TF141 hunt for Makarov by going to intresting combat environments.

Ranger squad is almost slaughtered but are saved by Kamarov - now rebels.
TF141 goes to a poss. location of Vlad but are ambushed by tipped off Rangers who believe them to be terrorists. But because TF141 didn't kill any rangers specially and because of evidence. Wait for it. A bit longer. They all attack Makarov who is launching his own assault on the Kremlin to sieze power. The Russian leaders are killed by Makarov's men but then all of the ultranationalists are killed. LeavingKamarov's friend to become Premier and stop the war.

Now lets have a new series.
 

IBlackKiteI

New member
Mar 12, 2010
1,613
0
0
Pararaptor said:
TylerC said:
...Don't we have enough futuristic shooters?
In comparison to the eternal onslaught of bland WW2 & modern-day shooters? Not at all.
It might feel as though there are more seeing as you tend to hear more about the better games.
Personally I'd support it somewhat if it was actually good.

If it features hostile aliens I'd be like that little gif animation of that cartoon dude smashing his head into a keyboard until it turns to bloody pulp.
 

Omikron009

New member
May 22, 2009
3,817
0
0
I once saw somebody suggest on the comments of a youtube video that knifing do 50-70 damage instead of being an instant kill. That would be nice. Either reduce the damage, or add a delay and the ability to miss or have your knife blocked, like in Bad Company 2.

Another thing that would be neat but maybe hard to implement would be a slightly different way of looking at pro perks. You know how in Mass Effect 2 when you fully leveled a power you could choose 2 different versions of it? How about doing that with pro perks. For example, bling/warlord could allow you either 2 attachments on your primary and 2 on your secondary, or 3 attachments on your primary, unless one of them is a grenade launcher/shotgun/flamethrower.
 

ArianaUO321

New member
Mar 20, 2010
60
0
0
For single player...

A really good, epic, and for the love of all that is holy, a LONG campaign.

Hans Zimmer doing music again, that alone made MW2 good in my eyes.

A player character with a voice, like there was in Black Ops.

I also wouldn't mind another character being voiced by Sam Worthington, also just like Black Ops (Alex Mason). He just has a sexy voice in my opinion.

A playable female character, also with a voice. (Jennifer Hale as a voice actor, yes? Maybe?)

Player characters actually surviving, unlike Modern Warfare 2.

More stealth missions, covert stuff, like was used in

A two player co-op mode.

Some more vehicular missions like Black Ops, those were fun.

Now, as for multiplayer...

My biggest gripe... Reduce the HELL out of the accuracy of fully automatic weapons! For gods sake, the most annoying thing ever for me in Black Ops, is when I shoot somebody from 200-300 yards away with a sniper rifle, and the moron survives, turns and SPRAYS at me with a FAMAS, or worse, an AK74u, his bullets throwing my crosshairs off, and most of his hitting. Increase the realism of this, seriously, if anybody were spraying from that sort of range with any automatic weapon, be it standing or laying prone they would be lucky to land a hit anywhere within a foot of their target, much less land most of the rounds in it.

Do away with the insta-kill knife. Make the melee a rifle butt, or a pistol whip, or something of that nature that takes at LEAST two hits to kill. Its serious BS that somebody can survive a near point blank shotgun blast, only to flick you with a knife and kill you instantly.

Larger maps! For the love of god, larger maps!
 

IBlackKiteI

New member
Mar 12, 2010
1,613
0
0
Pararaptor said:
IBlackKiteI said:
Personally I'd support it somewhat if it was actually good.

If it features hostile aliens I'd be like that little gif animation of that cartoon dude smashing his head into a keyboard until it turns to bloody pulp.
And you'd be okay with Russians, Germans or the Chinese? That wouldn't feel at all repetitive?
There is a lot of potential for an FPS game set in the future, even without aliens.
Pretty much infinite possibilities.

This is Activision though, do you think they care about the realisation of potential?

What I meant by my post is that aliens in an FPS game would most likely just be your regular bad dude in disguise.

If they weren't and were more than just that, enemy or not, than that would be brilliant, but unlikely to happen.
 

Sensenmann

New member
Oct 16, 2008
291
0
0
I want COD4 style stuff. I also want to ban those who are pissy every time they die, so they can stop saying: "Claymore noob", "M4 noob", "Noobtuber", "lucker noob".

People get annoyed that it's not an accurate portrayal of warfare and they want to remove the last things which make you "die like a dog for no good reason".


Also I want an enemy which isn't either Middle-Eastern or Russian. The Taliban are a worldwide organisation.
 

Lem0nade Inlay

New member
Apr 3, 2010
1,166
0
0
An awesome, over-the-top campaign like MW2.

No OMA or Commando (like Blops) and Scavenger doesn't replenish noobtubes either.

Don't really care if it's CoD points or level unlockable.

Interesting maps, like MW2. One of the things I hated about Blops was the depressing grey/brown maps, except for nuketown.

Quickscoping, please!

Bust most of all, I think they should take away Stopping Power, I think it was good of Black Ops to do that. However snipers should still probably only be a 1-2 shot kill.


Honestly, I loved everything about MW2 except for three things:
Knifing (commando)
Noob Tubers who used scavenger/danger close
Some guns were overpowered.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
superbleeder12 said:
WanderingFool said:
2)Inaccurate ARs at range. The fact that with a sniper rifle, a guy with a Famas can kill me from across the map in Arrey is so fucked up. I say give the assault rifles... hell, give all weapons, a limited range when in iron sights that the bullets will remain accurate, or even travel.
That's not the way guns work. bullets don't just stop mid flight. I'd advise adding bullet drop at range.
Wait, thats what bullets did in BFBC2 Hardcore mode right? That would work, anything to try to give the sniper it rightful place as a long range weapon.
 

Withall

New member
Jan 9, 2010
553
0
0
What I'd like to see in Modern Warfare 3 is a sensible, solid, single-player campaign. Other than that... eh, Multiplay will always be flawed.
 

Chickenfeed

New member
Dec 1, 2010
71
0
0
WanderingFool said:
superbleeder12 said:
WanderingFool said:
2)Inaccurate ARs at range. The fact that with a sniper rifle, a guy with a Famas can kill me from across the map in Arrey is so fucked up. I say give the assault rifles... hell, give all weapons, a limited range when in iron sights that the bullets will remain accurate, or even travel.
That's not the way guns work. bullets don't just stop mid flight. I'd advise adding bullet drop at range.
Wait, thats what bullets did in BFBC2 Hardcore mode right? That would work, anything to try to give the sniper it rightful place as a long range weapon.
Thats what bullets do on any BFBC2 mode.
 

Marowit

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,271
0
0
The only way Activision will get me to buy a new CoD:MoarmodernerWar game is if they include a campaign, not just a 4-5 hour after thought to their multiplayer game.

Multiplayer is a huge part of the game, I agree, but so is a compelling and fun single player campaign. If there's no good single player why should I pay for a new MP-FPS when I have TF2, which is still outrageously fun(and balanced) after all these years?

Also, my biggest gripe, other than everyone having fully automatic weapons now, is the size of the MP maps. I mean I can get more quarter wrestling with my cat in it's kitty-litter bin than I can in almost all the MW maps.