We are talking about private enterprises that are required to make a profit, not some social programs that go by the motto of "for the greater good".letterbomber223 said:It's a lot easier to get away with wasting vast quantities of food by de-naturing it into animal feed (as happens with most excess cereals from MEDC's, particularly since aid debt interest is paid in part through shipments of cereals from LEDC's to MEDC's) than it is to simply leave it rotting in a warehouse somewhere (which is almost as logistically problematic as shipment).
If we reduce the demand for animal feed, the only thing we are going to get out of it is reduced production. Because it simply wouldn't pay off, which would lead to food being more expensive for everyone.
Edit:
Desertification is not something that can't be combated. If you're going to spend millions on something, at least spend it on stuff that's going to last for more than a few months.
If Africa can't grow the vast majority of the food it requires, it's going to end up starving. The excess production from the Americas is not all that relevant to this equation.