I thought it said THIS YEARCombine Rustler said:New Vegas. Because in retrospect I can see how infinitely better Bethesda would have been off if they just hired Obsidian to do everything related to story or characters.
I know it's sad, but I read this as "Dark Souls Fus Ro Dah"Alphonse_Lamperouge said:Dark Souls Fo Sho.
What was wrong with it? I should probably find out before getting itMallefunction said:Revelations because of how terrible it was. Expected at LEAST Brotherhood quality. Got shit instead.
The first AC game that I'm even considering a return. I'm a pretty big fan, but Ubisoft really lost the ball on this one.
There are two things that make or break a JRPG for me.OutrageousEmu said:Its a JRPG for people who hate JRPG's, is essentially the overriding opinion on that.Daystar Clarion said:I second this.Palademon said:Xenoblade Chronicles.
A JRPG I still want to play after 30 hours?
WHAT IS THIS MAGIC??!!
It's a truly great JRPG if I haven't strangled myself with my own intestines after a few hours.
Like Twilight is the book for people who typically hate reading.
On topic, Mortal Kombbat. I was suprised by how much I really liked playing it, getting a feel for the combos, the special moves, the Fatalities, it was really enjoyable for me.
This, i waited till it dropped in price and i was still really suprised by how bad it was, i thought at the very least i would get a competent multiplayer, how wrong i was.Flailing Escapist said:Brink
I was expecting it to have no story, unneccesary customisation, etc. But I was unpleasently surprised by the -what- 5 maps, 2 gameplay types and glitchy horrible multiplayer.