mathmatically it is, death rates are lower than birth rates, plus reincarnation opposite to popular belief isn't just for humans, animals, insects, anything alive is fair game, even trees, and humans are low on the chain, so as long as there are less bad people dying then there are births then it's okay, and any leftover integers that aren't reincarnated souls, new souls are created. i'm not saying i believe it, but it is mathmatically possibleLiquidGrape said:I defer to Carlin's assessment that reincarnation isn't mathematically possible, and thus we remain tiny specks of carbon; in life and death.
No metaphysical mumbo jumbo, we simply cease to be.
unless you come back as a platypus, everyone knows that they are the only tax exempt creatures in the USADirty Saint said:You no longer have to pay taxes...........unless you're reincarnated.
Goddammit. >.<
Yeah, in the future as long as Athiesm advances Religion has two options:Uzigawa said:it's true i don't. i've looked into it, i don't find it much more practical, i just find it fanciful and interesting, if i could choose which one was true, it'd be that, mainly because it's not based on you blindly following a religion with no proof, any religion can get in, it's purely based on your merits as a human, it's what i wish more religions focused on, i'd like to think if christianity is true, that god could look past my disbelief for reasons that i truly looked into it, and i had no reason to believe, only reasons to not believe, god can't expect us to know everything, if he exists, he made us like that, plus, that leaves someone born in a certain region where christianity is not known, and when they die, they are damned to hell merely for where they were born, doesn't exactly sound logical.slowpoke999 said:I'm guessing you don't actually believe in reincarnation because of your previous posts but yeah that sounds awfully redundant to me, if they were to cut out the middleman, reincarnation is basically a delayed-afterlife.Uzigawa said:you reincarnate multiple times, actually, the theory is to move up the chain of reincarnated things until you finally die at the top, in which you reach enlightenment and go to paradise. it's a novel theory actualslowpoke999 said:What I'm trying to convey is that if everyone in the world were to die, how would they reincarnate when their is no baby or whatever born to 'reincarnate' to?Uzigawa said:don't think you have a good understanding of reincarnation, it doesn't mean someone is invulnerable, it means when you die, you are put in a new body, no memory of past lives, and what you become is based on deeds in your past life, and surprisingly enough, humans are low on the list of things you become, usually something that was bad in a past life becomes humanslowpoke999 said:Well technically we came into existence because before we were born we didn't exist, perhaps we aren't even 'living' now we are just a bunch of say data flowing through a computer, the data being our consciousness and the computer being our bodies, data can forever be lost(we die), duplicated and placed in a new computer(cloning) or moved to a new computer(placing our consciousness in another body, though that technology hasn't yet been invented).
I'm agnostic in every sense, don't know, don't care, but there is a possibility reincarnation doesn't exist(every lifeforms on Earth, nay, in all existence can be killed, so we wouldn't be able to reincarnate, making that theory obsolete). As much as believing in afterlife would be nice, I always try to take the rational thought, and consider even thinking about it except to share my thoughts with others such a waste of time, I never even think about it unless someone else mentions it, and guess what, 5 seconds after I enter 'post' I'll forget about it again.
Heh but that's the thing, what happens when the population of every living thing stabilizes and just stays the same while living organisms die then are born again,what is happening when people are dieing but not being born,where do they go, and what happens to them if no-one is ever born/grown again, do they just enter dreamless sleep until a new capsule arises for them, and if there are no new capsules created ever again do they cease to exist?Congratulations, reincarnation is almost exactly like permanent death that most Atheists believe in, almost.Uzigawa said:mathmatically it is, death rates are lower than birth rates, plus reincarnation opposite to popular belief isn't just for humans, animals, insects, anything alive is fair game, even trees, and humans are low on the chain, so as long as there are less bad people dying then there are births then it's okay, and any leftover integers that aren't reincarnated souls, new souls are created. i'm not saying i believe it, but it is mathmatically possibleLiquidGrape said:I defer to Carlin's assessment that reincarnation isn't mathematically possible, and thus we remain tiny specks of carbon; in life and death.
No metaphysical mumbo jumbo, we simply cease to be.
well, according to the religion, basically the universe won't let that happen, it will always make new creatures to continue the cycle, but if there is ever a remainder, it would probably just lower standards to be let into paradiseslowpoke999 said:Heh but that's the thing, what happens when the population of every living thing stabilizes and just stays the same while living organisms die then are born again,what is happening when people are dieing but not being born,where do they go, and what happens to them if no-one is ever born/grown again, do they just enter dreamless sleep until a new capsule arises for them, and if there are no new capsules created ever again do they cease to exist?Congratulations, reincarnation is almost exactly like permanent death that most Atheists believe in, almost.Uzigawa said:mathmatically it is, death rates are lower than birth rates, plus reincarnation opposite to popular belief isn't just for humans, animals, insects, anything alive is fair game, even trees, and humans are low on the chain, so as long as there are less bad people dying then there are births then it's okay, and any leftover integers that aren't reincarnated souls, new souls are created. i'm not saying i believe it, but it is mathmatically possibleLiquidGrape said:I defer to Carlin's assessment that reincarnation isn't mathematically possible, and thus we remain tiny specks of carbon; in life and death.
No metaphysical mumbo jumbo, we simply cease to be.
Tch, there are so many holes in that theory, what happens if your body wasn't in a position where gravity would affect its position when it become lifeless(like lieing down).SideburnsPuppy said:I'll fall over. Cookie for the reference!
da da chhhslowpoke999 said:Tch, there are so many holes in that theory, what happens if your body wasn't in a position where gravity would affect its position when it become lifeless(like lieing down).SideburnsPuppy said:I'll fall over. Cookie for the reference!
Whatever religion you got that from is the stupidest of them all.
Sorry I made a joke about applying over thinking to an obvious joke.
Cheezepuffology is not a religion! It's a way of dealing with the inherent futility and hypocrisies of life! (Still referencing the same thing here, guys! There are cookies galore!)slowpoke999 said:Whatever religion you got that from is the stupidest of them all.
I like to think that, by that point, there will be Dresden Codak-style technological singularity and nobody will have souls anyway, save for two certain possibly-nuclear-powered twins. And some apes. And a ragtag band of time-travelers.slowpoke999 said:Heh but that's the thing, what happens when the population of every living thing stabilizes and just stays the same while living organisms die then are born again,what is happening when people are dieing but not being born