This and nothing to add. Well said HubHubilub said:I.Q. only show how good you are at I.Q. tests, as they say.
I don't know, and I don't care. It's bullshit, and people just use it to brag.
To be honest, my concern is the opposite - that every time you're got at something, it's called intelligence. Like good eyesight being named "optical inteeligence" or a beuatiful voice being "audial intelligence" and so on. Also, I think we all have to admit that all other things being equal, it's better to have a high I.Q. than to have a low one.Winter Rat said:Varied between 115 and 130. Irrelevant as IQ tests are meaningless. I've seen high IQ scores on plenty of worthless people, and they only test one kind of "intelligence" ignoring the others.
i think you may have made some small error, 2+3=5, 5*2=10 right? 8+4=12, 12*8=96. 6+3=9, 9*6=56.grimsprice said:Is the answer 146? If so, it only took me 25 seconds. Is that particularly good?cartzo said:there is a simple quick test, if you can work this out then your IQ is more than 130.
2+3=10
8+4=96
6+3=56
9+7=????
my time was about 1.5mins. its not a test of mathematical skill, its a test of lateral thinking.
Oh yeah. lolz. somehow i got 146 out of 90+54. Don't ask how i did that. But hoorah I got the idea. sweet. And 5 seconds is wicked fast.cartzo said:i think you may have made some small error, 2+3=5, 5*2=10 right? 8+4=12, 12*8=96. 6+3=9, 9*6=56.grimsprice said:Is the answer 146? If so, it only took me 25 seconds. Is that particularly good?cartzo said:there is a simple quick test, if you can work this out then your IQ is more than 130.
2+3=10
8+4=96
6+3=56
9+7=????
my time was about 1.5mins. its not a test of mathematical skill, its a test of lateral thinking.
9+7=16, 16*9=144. as long as you applied that rule then you got it right, and if thats the case then your smarter than i am, it only took my mate tom 5 seconds though, i couldn't believe it.