In a perfect world I wish that would be the case but the entirety of Jrpgs to me are as a whole a standard afair now. Personally one of my faveourite Jrpgs is Infinate Undiscovery, in my eyes it didnt sacrifice gameplay for story, you were Capell, you were never taken to a seperate land in space and time to have ever single fight and didnt have to tell elveryone else in your party what to do, don't get me wrong as a whole I actually enjoy turn based combat but it really taked me out of it a bit.AC10 said:I'd prefer if there WASN'T a mascot series as it were. I wish all the games could just stand on their own merits.
I concur, Golden Sun was superb game, and it didn't require high budget cut scenes to tell a great story.hopeneverdies said:If it were Monday, I would say Golden Sun. But since it's not, Fire Emblem has quite a few JRPG tropes without being too cliche.
OH DEAR GOD.foodmaniac said:I would love Shin Megami Tensei to be the mascot of JRPGs, but its going to have to be Final Fantasy. It's more recognisable and SMT becoming mainstream would probably invoke the whole "BLARGH VIDEO GAMES ARE BAD FOR YOUR KIDS" argument.
I disagree. Every genre needs to evolve else we'd be playing the same game, over, and over, which is what a lot of genres have fallen into. Starcraft 2, Call of Duty, has been proof of it. Infact I'd argue that's why I don't purchase said DS rpgs, the other reason being I'm not big on handheld gaming.Garak73 said:People need to get this idea that JRPG's need to evolve out of their heads. JRPG's have evolved too much already to satisfy complainers who don't play JRPG's anyway.
Ever notice how JRPG's sell well on the DS but not well on the consoles? The DS (and GBA) has ports of older JRPG's while the console have these new "evolved" JRPG's. It seems clear that more people prefer the older JRPG's to the newer ones.