Except I really didn't.Persi said:Yes, because I didn't go off and kill anyone just because I played GTA. You basically just said "children 10 and under may not have fun".Mr. In-between said:There are many people out there who also believe that FOX is a legitimate news source with a high degree of journalistic integrity. Millions of people also watch reality television and actually care about celebrity gossip.Persi said:When I was 10 I'm preeeeetty sure that I knew just because I could kill people in a game doesn't mean it is in real life. It's the ones who know who play it.Mr. In-between said:I'm not stopping them. I'm not their parents.Persi said:Then, why not let them play it?Mr. In-between said:No, I hate everything about Rockstar. Their games are terrible. The complete antithesis to what I find enjoyable.Persi said:Let them have there fun with it, I had my fun and you probably did too.Mr. In-between said:The fact that a ten year old was playing GTA Vice City makes me really, really hate modern society.Persi said:Same, only I got a trilogy pack thing. I was around ten.Demented Teddy said:GTA Vice City when I was around 10
I just think that letting a ten year old play Grand Theft Auto speaks volumes about one's ability to be a good parent.
What I'm trying to say is: people are not that intelligent and while violent games don't make killers, is there any legitimate reason why a ten year old child should be exposed to that subject matter?
All I said was that I think it's in poor taste for a parent to let a ten year old child play a game that glorifies criminal behavior.