Outasight said:
A 12 Year old who willingly knows what they're doing blows a man in a car park is victimless because both parties gave consent but it is still a disgusting act and people who do it should be punished
They used to say that about homosexuality. And interracial couples, too. "It's icky so we must stop them!"
Insipidness aside EDIT FOR NINJAS:
Zeeky_Santos said:
12 year olds can't give consent, that's not a victimless crime. It's child molestation. A 16 (or older in some countries) year old who blows a guy in a car park with consent however. Shouldn't be a crime, what if he's gay? Hmm? Should we stop that because he enjoys sucking cock?
He says it better than my half-asleep brains can. But thanks for jumping to pedophilia to try and make me feel guilty about liking freedom, though.
EDIT AGAIN: Though I should keep the part where I mention that consent doesn't just mean not saying no. That's an important thing to remember.
ONE MORE TIME: Also, to give more of a substantial answer for general cases, either the younger one can give consent, and all that happens is you think it's icky because of an age difference; OR it's not a victimless crime because the younger one can't consent. So, that doesn't even address victimless crimes at all. But again, thanks for trying to bring the Pedo Hunt into this to do... whatever you meant to do, but unfortunately you can't have your cake (it's victimless) and eat it too (it's molestation).
HUH: "Discredit me"? I had no idea I typed that. It sounds stupid. Also has nothing to do with anything.
