We used to have a unified study system, but thanks to those fuckwits in political office we now have that [long string of descriptive cursewords] Bachelor's and Master's system, meaning that every single grade gets taken into account for the total average.Lord Monocle Von Banworthy said:You'd ban...failure? Like everybody just gets to do whatever he or she wants to do with no standards applied to it?Sonicron said:I'd ban admission restrictions for all university students trying to get into the Master of Education studies. A little specific, I know, but this is going to give me a fucking ulcer one of these days. I'm studying to be a teacher, and the harder of the two subjects I study has a grade average attached to its Master studies prerequisites.
Problem 1: If you fail to stay below the set average you'll be barred from entering the Master studies. You don't get put on a waiting list, you get the "Thanks for playing" card.
Problem 2: As a teacher, nobody hires you if you don't have a Master's degree in all of your study branches.
Seriously, this shit has started giving me nightmares. If I don't make that damn average grade I've flushed 3 years of my life down the toilet, which I can't afford.
But it's not even that. I'm nowhere near failing in my studies. The problem is that even though our entire group of geography students is small enough to ensure that everyone gets a spot on the Master's studies, they attached an arbitrary admission grade you have to pass in order to get in, regardless of whether you're actually still very much on track for passing your Bachelor's. Now, if your only subject is geography, then I can understand this; you can still get decent employment with just the Bachelor's degree... but for us future teachers, employability is directly linked to having a Master's degree.
This is not me trying to get into a program I don't deserve to be on. This is me rightfully complaining about blatant elitism.