Legion IV said:
NezumiiroKitsune said:
I can't believe people are saying Blizzard. It's owned by Activision which in turn is owned by Bobby Kotick who doesn't even care about the happiness of his own mother, as long as he's making money. Blizzard put out content with the sole intent of making you pay through the nose for years to come, innovating nothing. Starcraft, while undoubtedly a good game, was made because they KNEW it would sell millions, and they changed as little as possible in the grand scheme so everyone would be like "this is like starcraft but with more" and automatically give it excellent feedback through a combination of nostalgia and need to believe they didn't wait in vain. The less said about WoW the better.
I'd say Insomniac.
Edit: Seriously? BLIZZARD?! ActivisionBlizzard? Really?
I assume your a valve supporter? Or even funnier a bethesda supporter?
Neither, Valve are confrontational and lazy elitists who put out a few good FPSs and are excessively lauded for it, and because of this elitism decide whatever they say it's universal law. Also the nonsense that steam is revolutionary is painful to read. I like Portal alot, but that was good because they're good at what they do, not because they give a shit about us.
Bethesda are just lazy (many bugs without patches in all games) and despite making some of my favourite games to date, are being majorly inconsiderate and potentially retarded, releasing a stream of games no body is asking for. Brink and Rage both are in very similar strains of game, and Rage directly competes with New Vegas! Which I am eternally thankful Obsidian are developing.
Edit: I'm assuming you mean supporter in the sense of this thread. I think they've both produced good games, as I've said. I think Blizzard produced some good games.
