What's the dumbest game that you've played?

Recommended Videos

Asehujiko

New member
Feb 25, 2008
2,119
0
0
Stammer said:
Okay... Do I even need to name this game? I'm pretty sure if anyone's read my previous forum posts they'll know exactly where I'm going with this.

For those of you who joined since I started controlling my hatred for the putrid game, I'll give you some hints. It's an MMO. It's made by a company who's only made about 2 games. It's populated almost entirely by 12-year-old kids. The graphics are about as high quality as the N64. It has absolutely no original content whatsoever. There are a few million people worldwide who play it because it's impossible to get banned from it. Including the first (and currently only) expansion, the game has only 15 songs in its full repertoire. The difference between a high-quality piece of equipment and a normal-quality piece of equipment can mean the difference between 100 damage and 1000 damage hits.

Puke of Fapfap.
Turd of Buttcrak.
WORLD OF WARCRAP, gentlemen.

WoW is hands down the worst video game I've ever played. It's so ridiculously retarded that I can't even begin to describe how bad it is. You think what I wrote up there is "beginning to describe it"? That's not even scratching the surface of the tip of the iceberg.
Several of your statements are biased, unsupported and completely false.

-Blizzard made much more then 2 games. WoW is infact, the 6th installment of the warcraft series.

-The average age of wow players is 29 years according to blizzard's own statistics.

-The graphics are pretty decent for a 2005 game, purposefully kept low to allow the game to run on more different systems. There are also scrips to greatly improve them, sanctioned by blizzard.

-Visit every single page on www.wowwiki.com and tell me who did it first before using the word "nothing" in any claim.

-It's very possible to get banned. Just try discussing the merits of the Third Reich on the official forums and see what happens.

-Another expansion is in the works and that's alot more then most other games on ther market.

-A quick browse through my game files shows some 500 odd music files. The OST(not including ambient music or anything, just people's and places's theme tunes) of the expansion alone is 21 songs long.

-And how's this any different then the damage diffrence between a pistol and a rocketlauncher.?

-The rest of your post consists of hyperboles of how bad it is with absolutely NOTHing to base them.

-You are sponsored by LOTRO or AOC, we get that, now go spam somewhere else.
 

aryon984

New member
Oct 14, 2007
4
0
0
shatnershaman said:
My game is a Japanese Pokemon where you called them to fight for you and they could all talk.
Pokemon Diamond if I recall, I just couldn't stop laughing while playing that game... They even swore in it.... A GBA GAME!!! SWEARING!!! lol

anyway, the worst I've played.. Reign of Fire for GBA.
 

Fronken

New member
May 10, 2008
1,120
0
0
cant remember the full title, but it was a barbie game for the NES, still regret putting in those hours playing through the damn thing..
 

aryon984

New member
Oct 14, 2007
4
0
0
Fronken said:
cant remember the full title, but it was a barbie game for the NES, still regret putting in those hours playing through the damn thing..
....... shame.
 

stevesan

New member
Oct 31, 2006
302
0
0
N-Sef said:
TheNecroswanson said:
N-Sef said:
Probably Wolfenstein 3D and by extension early FPS titles. Absolutely no thinking involved.
Did you just compare today's strategy based FPS to the first FPSs ever made? And then deride said older FPS because it required no thinking, MISSING the fact they didn't have such space for proper coding of tactical elements?
Did I? I was just saying the early FPS games were mindless fun, that's all.
Yeah - and we need more of them. I'm all about mind-ful FPS, like Deus Ex. Closest thing to DOOM that I've played recently is Ratchet and Clank.
 

stevesan

New member
Oct 31, 2006
302
0
0
Leisure Suit Larry - Magnum Cum Laude.

The old LSL's were actually legit puzzle games. The recent ones are just..dumb.
 
Feb 14, 2008
1,278
0
0
Quake 4... Just a wannabe in every single way...

Bulletcandy... That game has GLITCHES in the fucking MENU! (wich by the way looks like something strait outta' notepad)
 

Jamash

Top Todger
Jun 25, 2008
3,638
0
0
Sex, on the ZX Spectrum. All you had to do was hammer two keys, it took no skill at all & had a non-existent storyline.

Also How To Be A Complete Bastard was pretty dumb, in a puerile sense, but it was pretty funny though. At one point you had the option of turning off a computer in the house, & if you did it actually reset your computer!
 

BlackWatch

New member
Feb 13, 2008
36
0
0
Asehujiko said:
Stammer said:
Okay... Do I even need to name this game? I'm pretty sure if anyone's read my previous forum posts they'll know exactly where I'm going with this.

For those of you who joined since I started controlling my hatred for the putrid game, I'll give you some hints. It's an MMO. It's made by a company who's only made about 2 games. It's populated almost entirely by 12-year-old kids. The graphics are about as high quality as the N64. It has absolutely no original content whatsoever. There are a few million people worldwide who play it because it's impossible to get banned from it. Including the first (and currently only) expansion, the game has only 15 songs in its full repertoire. The difference between a high-quality piece of equipment and a normal-quality piece of equipment can mean the difference between 100 damage and 1000 damage hits.

Puke of Fapfap.
Turd of Buttcrak.
WORLD OF WARCRAP, gentlemen.

WoW is hands down the worst video game I've ever played. It's so ridiculously retarded that I can't even begin to describe how bad it is. You think what I wrote up there is "beginning to describe it"? That's not even scratching the surface of the tip of the iceberg.
Several of your statements are biased, unsupported and completely false.

-Blizzard made much more then 2 games. WoW is infact, the 6th installment of the warcraft series.

-The average age of wow players is 29 years according to blizzard's own statistics.

-The graphics are pretty decent for a 2005 game, purposefully kept low to allow the game to run on more different systems. There are also scrips to greatly improve them, sanctioned by blizzard.

-Visit every single page on www.wowwiki.com and tell me who did it first before using the word "nothing" in any claim.

-It's very possible to get banned. Just try discussing the merits of the Third Reich on the official forums and see what happens.

-Another expansion is in the works and that's alot more then most other games on ther market.

-A quick browse through my game files shows some 500 odd music files. The OST(not including ambient music or anything, just people's and places's theme tunes) of the expansion alone is 21 songs long.

-And how's this any different then the damage diffrence between a pistol and a rocketlauncher.?

-The rest of your post consists of hyperboles of how bad it is with absolutely NOTHing to base them.

-You are sponsored by LOTRO or AOC, we get that, now go spam somewhere else.
Lemmie guess ... level 70?
 

666thHeretic

New member
May 26, 2008
103
0
0
Test Drive. I bought it from a bin because I had enjoyed one of the sequels ("Eve of Destruction," which reminded me of Burnout), so I mistakenly assumed this one would be worth the price tag. It starts off with a fairly standard "you're a tough black guy who takes NO SHIT WHATSOEVER FROM PEOPLE...who immediately agrees to drive for some crippled British guy in some underground racing thing. I remebre the first level being somewhere between hard and impossible. And on an interesting side note, the game (when I bought it) cost me twice as much as Painkiller and four times as much as Psychonauts. Proof that price tag and quality are completely seperate entities.
 

Asehujiko

New member
Feb 25, 2008
2,119
0
0
BlackWatch said:
Asehujiko said:
Stammer said:
Okay... Do I even need to name this game? I'm pretty sure if anyone's read my previous forum posts they'll know exactly where I'm going with this.

For those of you who joined since I started controlling my hatred for the putrid game, I'll give you some hints. It's an MMO. It's made by a company who's only made about 2 games. It's populated almost entirely by 12-year-old kids. The graphics are about as high quality as the N64. It has absolutely no original content whatsoever. There are a few million people worldwide who play it because it's impossible to get banned from it. Including the first (and currently only) expansion, the game has only 15 songs in its full repertoire. The difference between a high-quality piece of equipment and a normal-quality piece of equipment can mean the difference between 100 damage and 1000 damage hits.

Puke of Fapfap.
Turd of Buttcrak.
WORLD OF WARCRAP, gentlemen.

WoW is hands down the worst video game I've ever played. It's so ridiculously retarded that I can't even begin to describe how bad it is. You think what I wrote up there is "beginning to describe it"? That's not even scratching the surface of the tip of the iceberg.
Several of your statements are biased, unsupported and completely false.

-Blizzard made much more then 2 games. WoW is infact, the 6th installment of the warcraft series.

-The average age of wow players is 29 years according to blizzard's own statistics.

-The graphics are pretty decent for a 2005 game, purposefully kept low to allow the game to run on more different systems. There are also scrips to greatly improve them, sanctioned by blizzard.

-Visit every single page on www.wowwiki.com and tell me who did it first before using the word "nothing" in any claim.

-It's very possible to get banned. Just try discussing the merits of the Third Reich on the official forums and see what happens.

-Another expansion is in the works and that's alot more then most other games on ther market.

-A quick browse through my game files shows some 500 odd music files. The OST(not including ambient music or anything, just people's and places's theme tunes) of the expansion alone is 21 songs long.

-And how's this any different then the damage diffrence between a pistol and a rocketlauncher.?

-The rest of your post consists of hyperboles of how bad it is with absolutely NOTHing to base them.

-You are sponsored by LOTRO or AOC, we get that, now go spam somewhere else.
Lemmie guess ... level 70?
Yes, and...?
 

aidansan

New member
Jun 26, 2008
1
0
0
True Crime: Streets of LA.

"Unlock and play as Snoop Dogg".

No thank you. No amount of mr Dogg is going to stop this being wank.
 

gotgame.com

New member
Jun 26, 2008
6
0
0
A trucking game where you had to haul cargo from point a to point b . . . the most exciting part of the game was pulling over and filling up on diesel -_- . . . either that or when you quit the game . . .
 

SeaCalMaster

New member
Jun 2, 2008
464
0
0
TheNecroswanson said:
You want to know what wins "Most Dumb (Dumbest isn't a word.) Game Ever"? Solitaire. Grahpics are terrible, gameplay is too linear- Okay fine, I know you've all heard the joke four-thousand times. But on a serious note, I'm not too big a fan of Assassin's Creed, (big surprise). It was innovative ideas that went straight to hell through poor implimentation.
First of all, dumbest is, in fact, a word.
Second, while you might consider AC to be a bad game (and would be justified to some extent), it's not really a stupid game. There was nothing wrong with the storyline or the premise. Admittedly the whole genetic memory thing was quite a stretch, but other than that, there wasn't anything dumb about it.

Anyway, to revive a classic (unless someone else already mentioned it, in which case I apologize), I would have to give a medal to Custer's Revenge. If you've never heard of this game, look it up. It's one of the worst ideas I've ever seen in a game.
 

Xhumed

New member
Jun 15, 2008
1,526
0
0
Serious Sam, in the real sense of the word dumb- mindless splatterfest shooty 'xplodey action, but so, so much fun.
 

apmpnmdslkbk

New member
Jun 30, 2008
360
0
0
The MGS series made me want to go out and beat the mentally retarted people who created the game to a point where there face would only look like spagetti meat balls (dont ask me how that makes sense it just does).
 

Stammer

New member
Apr 16, 2008
1,726
0
0
Asehujiko said:
Several of your statements are biased, unsupported and completely false.

-Blizzard made much more then 2 games. WoW is infact, the 6th installment of the warcraft series.

-The average age of wow players is 29 years according to blizzard's own statistics.

-The graphics are pretty decent for a 2005 game, purposefully kept low to allow the game to run on more different systems. There are also scrips to greatly improve them, sanctioned by blizzard.

-Visit every single page on www.wowwiki.com and tell me who did it first before using the word "nothing" in any claim.

-It's very possible to get banned. Just try discussing the merits of the Third Reich on the official forums and see what happens.

-Another expansion is in the works and that's alot more then most other games on ther market.

-A quick browse through my game files shows some 500 odd music files. The OST(not including ambient music or anything, just people's and places's theme tunes) of the expansion alone is 21 songs long.

-And how's this any different then the damage diffrence between a pistol and a rocketlauncher.?

-The rest of your post consists of hyperboles of how bad it is with absolutely NOTHing to base them.

-You are sponsored by LOTRO or AOC, we get that, now go spam somewhere else.
- It's less biased than most WoW players. Most people who play World of Warcrap have only ever played World of Warcrap and yet they still claim it's the god of all video games.

- No. It's only two games. Everything else is a spin-off. There is Warcraft, there is Diablo. Starcraft is Warcraft in space. World of Warcrap is Warcraft fused with Diablo. Every sequel is just that, a sequel.

- Statistics can mean anything. Many children lie about their age just to be allowed to play the game without having to go through the whole parental crap. It's a well-known fact that even if the players are averaging 29 years old, they all still act like 9 years old.

- Actually, graphics really don't bother me that much about games. Again, it's more the people who treat it like God and say "WoW has the best grafix evar" that piss me off. I know the game's supposed to be cartoony, like Warcraft itself, but some of the graphics are inexcusably bad.

- I... I just can't nagivate wowwiki. I've tried. I really have. It's such a badly designed site, just like the game.

- A friend of mine was on his last day of WoW ever. He went to Stormwind and shouted "WORLD OF WARCRAFT SUCKS" for half an hour straight. Everyone told him to shut up and probably half of the game blocked him. He didn't get kicked off. He just got bored and logged off.

- Another expansion with a ripped off name. It's called Wrath of the Lich-King, right? Ever hear of Rise of the Witch-King (it could be mixed-up a little in there, but who cares)? It's the expansion to another game. Plus, if this new expansion is anything like Burning Crusade, it'll drive more people away. I mean, seriously, increasing the level cap and adding new armor for said level cap just makes every other piece of equipment negligible that people have worked so hard to acquire. It's not fun when all that crap just goes for nothing. And in WoW, the right equipment can mean the difference between 100 damage or 1000 damage.

- No idea on the songs. Just going by what I saw on this one website that had the OST.

- First person shooters have always weirded me out like that. I don't care if it's a pistol, a machine gun, or a rocket launcher. In reality, any one of those things would kick your ass in one second. In a video game, that doesn't make a difference. In WoW, having equipment mean that much of a difference takes away from any skill aspect of the game. See Final Fantasy XI for a game that requires strategy to play.

- Yeah, that's pretty much what the whole post was about. Exaggerations. Just trying to get my points across.

- LOTRO wouldn't even install on my computer. Don't even know what AOC- oh wait, Age of Conan? Just got into my mind.

Actually, I play Final Fantasy XI in terms of full-time MMO. I know it's far from the epitome of good games. It pisses me off a lot. But I find it's fun to get back into because it's a lot more mature, a lot more stable, and has a much wider variety of things to do than I've seen in any MMO. The only two things that could really be improved would be the tempo and quest system. Seriously. If FFXI had the quest system that WoW had, it would be probably the best game ever. The quests themselves are better than WoW's, but the system is ass.

We have no quest description whatsoever, and as you get further into the quests, the description doesn't change. Most of them you have to figure out for yourself. Or, you know, look on FFXIclopedia. Hell yeah.