These opinions stop me being taken seriously in debates with my friends, which is quite irritating.
1. I believe that countries should look after their own first. For example, England should place English nationals at top priority. If you've come in from a different country, then you get the short end of the stick. You don't have to be here. If you've moved to England because your job took you here, or because you want to try living in a different country, I can assume that you've already got work and housing sorted, so this doesn't apply to you. But where things like benefits are concerned, English nationals deserve it far more than asylum seekers or illegal immigrants...simply because you should not get the crappy end of the deal from your own country. Ain't your fault where you're born. If your own country was that bad that you had to leave for England, then I'm sure you've had worse than a little bit of a delay in getting a house, and it shouldn't be an issue.
For this opinion, I've been called misled, ignorant, racist, insensitive, uncaring, and a bigot.
2. I support abortion. I am pro-choice. No child should have to be brought up in a home where its parents cannot look after it, or simply don't want to. It just ain't right. If you can't afford to look after a child, then don't have one. In these cases, plus rape, inability to give healthy birth, and other, similar reasons, I think abortion is to be supported.
I've had Immanuel Kant's universal maxims quoted at me here, but to that I quote to you the same.
"If everybody had abortions all the time, there would be no children. However, if everybody who could not raise a child had abortions all the time, all children born would be raised in proper conditions, and the human race would be better for it."
Kant is just a matter of specifics.
3. I disagree with democracy. No. I don't think everyone should have a 'fair' vote. Fairness is irrelevant. People can't run a country. Well, 'average' people can't run a country. Anybody who genuinely believes that all our country's problems stem from that Indian family down the road should not be allowed to vote. This is why I disagree totally with America's actions in Iraq. I can't say whether or not they were right to intervene...they probably were, and that's fine. Intervention is good, on some occasions. However, trying to force a democracy on a Middle-Eastern country like that just doesn't work. Sometimes it just doesn't belong. And democracy is just Greek for 'Won't Ever Get Shit Done'. Everytime a leader tries to take a risky political manoeuvre that could lead to long-term gain, he gets voted out of office, and his successor 'fixes his mistakes'.
4. Religious people should never be in charge of a country. I'm not saying that belonging to a religion should exempt you, BUT if you're devout enough to let religious practice influence your political decisions, you should be removed. Religion belongs in churches, in misjads, and in the home. Religion influences personal decisions. It should not influence nationwide plans.
5. Faith schools should be reserved for the faithful. It is no lie that Catholic schools are some of the best...and one of the major debates around Lincolnshire regards a Church of England school in the area. The debate centres around the fact that the headmaster said that only Church of England children should be allowed to attend the school...meanwhile, the public demands that they open it for everyone. Apparently excluding people based on faith is wrong.
Well, it's a faith school. I would far rather atheist families have their children excluded than brought up Christian. Great schooling is overrated anyway, and I would hate for my children to grow up with the bullshit I got. I didn't even go to a faith school...at least, I don't think I did. But the teachers were religious. We sang hymns and prayed every morning. And when I asked to be excluded because I did not believe in God? Well, I committed educational suicide. None of the teachers would help me...and any attempt at complex vocabulary from me was met with complaints of 'showing off' and 'childish competition'.
All because I used the word 'sheathed' instead of 'put away' in the context of Peter's sword.
1. I believe that countries should look after their own first. For example, England should place English nationals at top priority. If you've come in from a different country, then you get the short end of the stick. You don't have to be here. If you've moved to England because your job took you here, or because you want to try living in a different country, I can assume that you've already got work and housing sorted, so this doesn't apply to you. But where things like benefits are concerned, English nationals deserve it far more than asylum seekers or illegal immigrants...simply because you should not get the crappy end of the deal from your own country. Ain't your fault where you're born. If your own country was that bad that you had to leave for England, then I'm sure you've had worse than a little bit of a delay in getting a house, and it shouldn't be an issue.
For this opinion, I've been called misled, ignorant, racist, insensitive, uncaring, and a bigot.
2. I support abortion. I am pro-choice. No child should have to be brought up in a home where its parents cannot look after it, or simply don't want to. It just ain't right. If you can't afford to look after a child, then don't have one. In these cases, plus rape, inability to give healthy birth, and other, similar reasons, I think abortion is to be supported.
I've had Immanuel Kant's universal maxims quoted at me here, but to that I quote to you the same.
"If everybody had abortions all the time, there would be no children. However, if everybody who could not raise a child had abortions all the time, all children born would be raised in proper conditions, and the human race would be better for it."
Kant is just a matter of specifics.
3. I disagree with democracy. No. I don't think everyone should have a 'fair' vote. Fairness is irrelevant. People can't run a country. Well, 'average' people can't run a country. Anybody who genuinely believes that all our country's problems stem from that Indian family down the road should not be allowed to vote. This is why I disagree totally with America's actions in Iraq. I can't say whether or not they were right to intervene...they probably were, and that's fine. Intervention is good, on some occasions. However, trying to force a democracy on a Middle-Eastern country like that just doesn't work. Sometimes it just doesn't belong. And democracy is just Greek for 'Won't Ever Get Shit Done'. Everytime a leader tries to take a risky political manoeuvre that could lead to long-term gain, he gets voted out of office, and his successor 'fixes his mistakes'.
4. Religious people should never be in charge of a country. I'm not saying that belonging to a religion should exempt you, BUT if you're devout enough to let religious practice influence your political decisions, you should be removed. Religion belongs in churches, in misjads, and in the home. Religion influences personal decisions. It should not influence nationwide plans.
5. Faith schools should be reserved for the faithful. It is no lie that Catholic schools are some of the best...and one of the major debates around Lincolnshire regards a Church of England school in the area. The debate centres around the fact that the headmaster said that only Church of England children should be allowed to attend the school...meanwhile, the public demands that they open it for everyone. Apparently excluding people based on faith is wrong.
Well, it's a faith school. I would far rather atheist families have their children excluded than brought up Christian. Great schooling is overrated anyway, and I would hate for my children to grow up with the bullshit I got. I didn't even go to a faith school...at least, I don't think I did. But the teachers were religious. We sang hymns and prayed every morning. And when I asked to be excluded because I did not believe in God? Well, I committed educational suicide. None of the teachers would help me...and any attempt at complex vocabulary from me was met with complaints of 'showing off' and 'childish competition'.
All because I used the word 'sheathed' instead of 'put away' in the context of Peter's sword.