In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?
I agree the next Fallout should be set between 1 and 2 or sometime around then.JaceValm said:Somewhere in central USA perhaps? Also maybe much earlier than previous games?
For me, Fallout needs to step back. Its built up the NCR and the west coast a lot. Perhaps its time to leave it be. Otherwise it will soon become a franchise without a wasteland. So my request to Fallout is: Go back, turn back the clocks to 2100's or very early 2200's. Move away from the coasts and the big factions already built up and start again. Make the wasteland more dangerous and deadly, more of a challenge. Make radiation more prevalent and dangerous. The Mojave desert in F:NV was (in my mind) too similar to the expanses and plains of New Austin in Red Dead Repemption.
Maybe set it in a city? The ruins of DC made a brilliant battleground between man, mutant and everthing in between without comprimising the sense of exploration.
Yes radioactive everglades would be an interesting change of scenery.Manji187 said:In the state of Florida?
But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
Obviously not, don't be absurd!....... We have Metro 2033 as well!JesterRaiin said:Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
So you're implying that the quantity of games taking place in same/similar setting is somehow limited ?Soviet Heavy said:Obviously not, don't be absurd!....... We have Metro 2033 as well!JesterRaiin said:Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
No, I'm not even being really serious. Just joking.JesterRaiin said:So you're implying that the quantity of games taking place in same/similar setting is somehow limited ?Soviet Heavy said:Obviously not, don't be absurd!....... We have Metro 2033 as well!JesterRaiin said:Are you implying that one game per setting is enough ?Soviet Heavy said:But we already have Stalker.JesterRaiin said:In Soviet Russia. Every game placed in Soviet Russia is automatically 140% better !Soviet Heavy said:Where should #4 sit?![]()
There was a whole and very funny joke there that you missed.Jamie Ruston said:That was The District of ColumbiaDirzzit said:I thought fallout 3 was set in Detroit, you know as a prequel before the bombs fell.Jamie Ruston said:Let's say Detroit.