Which FPS Actually Takes Skill?

Recommended Videos

Kortney

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,960
0
0
RelexCryo said:
Kortney said:
I think Call of Duty takes some skill. Playing a game of hardcore free for all with 15 really good players can be hell sometimes.

I guess what I'm getting at is all FPS games take skill. It's the same kind of skill too, so I think if someone is very naturally good at Call of Duty, they will be good at Counter Strike and New Vegas and anything in between. Granted they might have trouble with the slower pacing, but I think they'd still be above average with it.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/experienced-points/8066-Experienced-Points-Before-There-Was-Halo

There is a difference between skill based on precision and skill based on timing. Just saying.
I was talking about PC gaming here. Just because I mention Call of Duty does not mean I am talking about an Xbox.
 

vazzaroth

New member
May 19, 2009
79
0
0
Well this thread is officially too long to read, but if it hasn't been said: Red Orchestra. So much.

Without experience and a plan, coupled with battlefield awareness and a sense of when to lay low and when to run flat out, bayonet set to "Stab"... you will just die. Alot.
And to me, that is the epitome of "skill"... but to be fair I favor tactical skill and decision making over twitch (And I cringe to use this word here) "skillz", the kind people who insist WoW pvp is anything but suits of armor and rare weapons number-fighting each other takes.

Now to totally counter my own argument, TF2 does take alot of skill in my book. I can attest, because over the years I went from dying a ton and thinking "X or Y is OP!" to understanding how I need to react in almost every situation with various classes.

But again, I argue that "skill" doesn't exist in video games, and that people really mean experience or tactical thinking when they refer to it. Or the ability to hit semi-random keys like a crack addict, depending.

Edit: Oh look, RO was mentioned right above my post! Anyway, I still think its the most skillful FPS.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
OP I'm a little lost when you blatantly say something like Bad Company 2 doesn't take skill to play, I'm aware this is an opinion thing but I've seen bad players and I've seen skilled players and it's a bit ridiculous to flat out say a certain FPS doesn't take skill to play.

I've heard the same thing about TF2 and how that is a skill-less game, and I've seen some big matches where there's people doing things that I didn't think was possible.

Most games take a degree of skill, practice is something that adds to it sure but that should be obvious.
 

Bad Cluster

New member
Nov 22, 2009
154
0
0
Zer_ said:
Quake 3 Arena / Quake Live...

Part 1:

Part 2:
You damn ninja!

tomany2 said:
I Started playing Counterstrike Source after about 8 months away from it, and between all the Call Of Duty, and Bad Company, I lost the ability to actually kill something in CS:S.

So I ask all of you, What FPS's actually take skill to play online?

For Me Call Of Duty, and The Recent Battlefields are like a cake walk. they are so simple.

But in my opinion, the FPS's that actually DO take skill, would be...

CS:S and Battlefield 2 (the one from 2005 for PC, not Bad Company 2)

EDIT: Lots of people say that "All Multiplayer Games Take Skill" and i agree to that. BUT things like CS:S and Battlefield 2 do take a lot longer to learn, rather than Bad Co or COD, which can be picked up by even the newest gamers, and they can get kills, but this is also true for CS:S and BF2. 'Cause my sister cant play COD for her life, but is the top of the leaderboard for both CS:S and BF2 in most the games that she joins.
I'm not going to call any games or compare anything, I'm simply going to say this:

The amount of skill needed depends on who you're playing with, the game itself is just a tool and a matter of taste.


PS:
Personally, I prefer simple FPS games like Quake/Quake 3, Unreal Tournament or Painkiller, they could appear simple and they spit on realism, but they don't limit you in any way.
I've been playing Quake since the day it was released back in 1996, that would make 15 years, and I'm still learning how to play it better.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
One's that have serious players that spend way too much time playing. The only way to get really good at a game is unending repetition. Most people will move one and play something else but the games where people start playing and don't stop for 10 years when the servers go down, those are the hard games. Now, you still have to play with those people but for old or unpopular games they tend to be the only ones there anyways.
 

phelan511

New member
Oct 29, 2010
123
0
0
I would say America's Army took quite alot of skill, only game I've played where getting whooshed by an enemy (or friendly) shot causes your accuracy to go out the window, also its the only game I've played where the grenade physics are closest to real life, has bleed out (which also affects accuracy) and any time you aim down the sights your player breathes and the sights naturally bobs up and down. Oh, and weapon jams. Certain weapons jam more than others too. Fucking SAWs. Jamming all the time like in real life the piece of shit.

Edit: and forget about hip firing, one way ticket to deadland
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
I'm actually going to say a bit about Fallout 3 and New Vegas if you don't mind.

This is probably true about a number of FPSs...but anyone who thinks it's easy to hit a tiny speck in the distance, so far out that VATS throws up its hands in disgust, is crazy. There was a topic in here before about the use of iron sights. Well, think of it this ways. Doing it the hard way certainly teaches you how to really aim, doesn't it?
 

MetallicaRulez0

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,503
0
0
Halo 2 has the highest skill cap of any shooter. It's very easy to be a mediocre Halo player, but to be truly great requires a lot more talent and practice than any other multiplayer I've ever played. This coming from someone who plays Call of Duty 4 exclusively these days. I know for a fact that I was using more "skill" to dominate in Halo 2 than I use to dominate in CoD4. CoD4 is pretty easily the most "skill"-based CoD game as well.

Learning double and quad shots alone takes more skill than any other shooter, not to mention ridiculous dexterity.
 

Nexoram

New member
Aug 6, 2010
282
0
0
start rant/ Well, I actually think BC2 takes skill. If you want to win, one must make squads and actually help the team. Not sitting in a corner waiting for 'that guy' to come into your crosshairs every ten minutes. Actually actively helping your team by getting down and dirty. The real thing that is dragging down FPS's is COD really. The game is so ridiculous that having an extra guy with you won't make it less dangerous, it just gives the enemy a double kill. Think about that for a bit, having an extra guy watching your back but just helping the enemy Rambos running around because the guns are all just point, shoot and repeat. So Call of Duty is fun but mindless really, and the people who do tryhard 360s. Please stop, you're not pro and just look like a tryhard. /end rant
 

Trolldor

New member
Jan 20, 2011
1,849
0
0
whiteblood said:
No, Counter-Strike doesn't take skill, it takes hacker programs. I've played it only a small amount, but dumping half a clip into some guys chest only to have him kill me is bullshit.
Played too much call of duty haven't you?

You aren't supposed to dump ammo.
 

EvanJO

New member
Nov 8, 2010
93
0
0
Steve5513 said:
tomany2 said:
Steve5513 said:
Battlefield 2 is horrible. Worst hit detection in any game I've ever seen.
The seem to be okay for me, possibly cause i set the games internal settings to 100 ticks, and the new update also helped...

it isn't so much the hit boxes, as that the guns have recoil, and spraying doesn't really work.
Lucky you.

No. It isn't recoil and nor do I spray. I use any gun with 3 burst fire mode. I'm not the only one with this problem and it's pretty well documented.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8Zfyx5q9kI There's also this.
Hey, that video was made by my old BF2 team! lol NHB...CAL bf2. Good times.

Anyways, most FPS take skill to some degree, more so to play in the competitive scene.
 

MrFunkyNuts

New member
Feb 10, 2011
1
0
0
Ok I signed up just to respond to this thread. I'll run down a few of the titles I've seen mentioned.

Halo- Child's play

Call of Duty- A step up from Halo but is really easy to get used to

Fallout- It was challenging at some points but never really took any skill

Bad Company 2- I'd say this takes some skill but was a shameful addition to the Battlefield series.

Counter Strike- Once I got used to it the game wasn't hard at all

However there is one game that I've played that I know takes skill, STALKER. Anyone who plays STALKER can agree as well. It is hard on every difficulty and starts off harder than any game should.
 

SGDeath2

New member
Jul 21, 2009
45
0
0
I say the Operation: Flashpoint series and Battlefield. Flashpoint because you REALLY have to think and be wary about EVERYTHING you do, battlefield is the same just on a much lesser instant-lethal way.
 

Trolldor

New member
Jan 20, 2011
1,849
0
0
What I saw from playing CoD was that spamming dual revolvers and jumping around like you're playing a curious blend of russian-roulette and leap frog was enough to get me 24 kill streak and win the game after launch a goddamn chopper.
I've played it for two hours in total at my cousin's house.
Skill required: None