Which franchise did Hollywood ruin more? Twilight or Eragon?

Recommended Videos

Tim Buck II

New member
May 22, 2009
181
0
0
Riding on Thermals said:
-Zen- said:
So you're saying that Twilight was charming and well-written?
THANK YOU! As I was reading the OP I was praying to God this had already been mentioned. Stephanie Meyers's 4-piece shit-a-thon was neither charming nor was it well-written. I've read better fan fiction.

To the original point: Eragon. Because it was actually a decent story that was lobotomized for film. I can't say that Hollywood ruined Twilight since it already did a excellent job of that on its own.

Also, OP, the pale white pretty-boy signed to Twilight was somewhat crucial, no? Considering the absurd amount of text dedicated solely to the character's looks in the book, it would have been pretty difficult to hire anyone else.
Seconded.

You say that fan fiction is better than the Twilight books. I think the fourth book was fan fiction. I honestly do.
 

GotMalkAvian

New member
Feb 4, 2009
380
0
0
I'm gonna have to go with Eragon, since Twilight- in any form- has absolutely nothing of merit to offer.
 

superdance14

New member
Oct 15, 2008
186
0
0
Eragon because even Hollywood is aware that if Twilight is found to be any worse than it already is, the world will collapse on itself.
 

ConnorCool

Master Assassin
Apr 23, 2009
673
0
0
Cody211282 said:
ConnorCool said:
Cody211282 said:
ConnorCool said:
Eragon, I wanted to cry it was really that terrible. I loved them books

and Twilight was a terrible film, I saw it without even knwing that it was a book, and I knew nothing of the fanboyism, so I went in with an open mind to it, and it was so goddamn awful
ya i knew nothing about it untill i heard about every girl 13-30 in this crappy ass town squeal at anyone who would listen about the damn thing, i took that as a big warning sign and stayed away.
well I took my girlfriend to see it, bad move. she got slightly obsessed with the main guy, which was horrific, but its all over now.

on a different note, how stupid is the fact that the vampires are shiny, I mean, who the hell thought of that??? well obviously the writer, but its just silly really
Ya i just sat down my girl after the move and had her watch Lostboys and Salems Lot, that cleared that up quickly.

high five to that one, nice work 8]
 

InsanityManifest

New member
Nov 14, 2007
116
0
0
To be fair, neither of these books are really all that good. Eragon was better written than Twilight but that's only because Eragon borrowed from every damn fantasy novel I've ever read.

I would rather they have made Eragon a video game.
 

Tim Buck II

New member
May 22, 2009
181
0
0
Lord_Seth said:
HardRockSamurai said:
Both Twilight and Eragon had humble beginnings as charming, well written, and fairly successful fantasy novels.
You're joking, right? Twilight is one of the few books I've read that I found to be so bad that reading it was literally painful.
Fixed.
 

Danglybits

New member
Oct 31, 2008
517
0
0
Maybe Twilight is a big joke? What if in 10 years time Meyer is just going to scream "Gotcha" and tell us she didn't mean any of it. I'm just gonna pretend that's true.

And the Eragon movie didn't make a whole lot of sense and was overly convenient so I'll just say Eragon was a terrible movie and leave it at that. I avoid anything with dragons or vampires in it like the plague though. It saves me a lot of grief.
 

CMon

New member
Jun 18, 2009
237
0
0
Both were reDUNKULOUSly plain to begin with. You don't expect anyone to turn crowsilver into gold.
 

B Goy

New member
Jan 5, 2010
83
0
0
Twilight killed the monster genre and Eragon in my opinion wasn't that bad I'm going to say Twilight wac worse
 

aruseusx

New member
Apr 22, 2009
864
0
0
The problem with Eragon is that it was cheesy. Power metal cheesy. If it was more seriously it would be accepted more in fantasy literature.