I wasn't going to post, but I just HAD to pick this out. Yeah sorry, man but you're not converting anyone in that fight; I don't want my Temperature scale to start with some Completely Arbitrary value thank you very much.Signa said:I like to hear that the temperature is a nice even 70F, not a random 21.1C. The boiling and freezing temperature of water is irrelevant when I want data on the climate for my day. Just because they made the scale 0-100 doesn't make it instantly better.
But that would be silly, because there are differences between Canadian football and American football. It's not a completely different sport, but it is different. Not sure why I know that, considering I'm not a huge fan of football, or sports in general, but I do.Chamale said:Speaking of football, my friend said today that Canadians should call hockey "football" just to further confuse the debate between English and American football.
can i get ONE person who DOESN'T live in the american midwest to admit that not all of us are hicks? i am in no way saying that saint louis is a goddamn eden amidst a dystopian wasteland of drunken cousin fuckers but christ give us SOME credit.theklng said:as the seasoned reader would notice, i did not explicitly take sides; i merely pointed out the flaws of your argument through sarcasm. but, given what you have said thus far in this so called discussion, my attempts at explaining myself are, at best, futile.Signa said:so because you simply disagree with my stance, it's garbage? Well, by that logic, your post is also garbage because I disagree with it. Or are you the king of garbage deciding? 'cause if that's the case, then my humble opinion has no weight in declaring your post garbage and I apologize for making such an egregious accusation.theklng said:lets choose the system that has more random, organic measurements so that we may sound more cool when we use the chosen words for describing life-changing distance comparisons.
because you know, being cool is so underrated.
the one good argument you have is cultural differences, but the rest is garbage.
i also hear that this sort of behavior is popular among the american midwestern tribes, and is often used as a ritual to seduce the females (preferably under the effects of moonshine).
is pure genius.Chamale said:..my friend said today that Canadians should call hockey "football" just to further confuse the debate between English
and American football.
Wait, that's news to me. Are you saying that 300F is not exactly 3x hotter than 100F? As in 101F is not 1/100th hotter than 100F?Sinclose said:Now as this fellow pointed out:Signa said:The same goes for temperature. I like to hear that the temperature is a nice even 70F, not a random 21.1C. The boiling and freezing temperature of water is irrelevant when I want data on the climate for my day. Just because they made the scale 0-100 doesn't make it instantly better.
I hate the temperature system in the imperial system for the simple reason that it is on a non-linear scale. Equal incremental changes on the scale do NOT equal equivalent incremental changes in temperature on the Fahrenheit scale.Chamale said:You know, metric doesn't have to be super-precise. When it's 21.1 we say "20 degrees", and when someone tells you it's 70 in Fahrenheit it's probably more like 68.3 or 73.1.
If you got 40 rods to the hogshead, you should trade it in for something more fuel efficient, like NASA's crawler.BringBackBuck said:The metric system is the tool of the devil! My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I like it.
Also, this:
is pure genius.Chamale said:..my friend said today that Canadians should call hockey "football" just to further confuse the debate between English
and American football.
I live in Seattle. All I know is when I took a vacation up to Canada one weekend, the weather report on TV used decimals for more accurate representations of the temperature.Retosa said:21 degrees celcius is nice. Most people don't say 21.1, they say 21. If it gets high enough, (21.6 or 21.7) we just say 22. Honestly, I can't understand Farenheit. Your freezing point is the same as a point where I'm sweltering.
Thanks. I tryAWDMANOUT said:First off, I hate clicking the respond box and seeing a damn captcha box popping up underneath.
But that's beside the point. What I wanted to say is, while your argument sounds completely valid and holds its respective ground, I must let you know...
This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard someone argue about. Ever.
It's meant to be exaggerated and silly. Once again, I'm auguring the number of measuring units we allow ourselves to go over. When it's small, there is a lot of leeway, which technically is an advantage, but juxtapose that onto the other system and it's just laughable.Merkavar said:so the only reason you think fahrenheit is better is cause thats what you are used too?Signa said:snip
i still think your cooking example is silly. in your metric example your adding 10/200th extra or somthing like that. something small. then in your imperial example your adding like 300% more. adding 10 more units when dealing with milliliters is not the same as adding 10 more units when using a cup. its just not the same and honestly its making me think your a bit wierd and i dont want to eat anything you cook.
I know I'm not representing myself very intelligently here, but I'm from Seattle and I read a stat where we were the 5th most educated city in the country or something. I probably spent the most time on my response to the same post you also responded to just trying to dumb myself down enough to sound like a hillbilly while writing. If you didn't see it before though, I consider this a throwaway topic to bicker and have some fun with. HOPEFULLY I'm not looking too dumb while doing it.ToAsTy McBuTTeR said:can i get ONE person who DOESN'T live in the american midwest to admit that not all of us are hicks? i am in no way saying that saint louis is a goddamn eden amidst a dystopian wasteland of drunken cousin fuckers but christ give us SOME credit.
You read the original post I copied. I said "the sizes of the measurements". Perhaps I was trying to be too concise, but if you read it closely, I don't see how it could be misinterpreted. Your comment on the other hand (while also true), doesn't leave much room for misinterpretation. And I'm not looking for sympathy, it was just humorous and remarkable. I've never had so many quotes in my inbox between visits here, and it was just amusing how none of them understood what I meant.Soylent Bacon said:Maybe if you had said "how inconvenient the proportions are" or offered a brief explanation, you might not have gotten flamed, but if you just call the sizes "dumb," you're bound to get some heat.
Imagine if, instead of pointing out a specific reason you may have been misunderstood, my comment only said "This thread is dumb. Stop complaining." Would you really be able to sympathize with me if I started a thread later about how that comment was misunderstood?
Damn, now I need to look up later where and how it scales. I've always thought the numbers were constant....Sinclose said:Yup, that's exactly what I meant. Temperature can be expressed in terms of energy-which determines how hot or how cold an object is-and 300F does NOT mean that it contains 3x the energy at 100F. However, an object at 30 degrees Celsius will have 3x the energy of an object at 10 degrees Celsius.
(Please also note that I'm overly simplifying my examples for the sake of convenience)