Mazty said:
Well the size of the FF series has been on the decrease since the PS1 era, with FF10 not even having a proper world map. I never got al the way through 12 as it was so dire (crap characters). Fact of the matter is, the 360 is weaker than the PS3 so FF13 won't be as good as it could be if it was just an exclusive. Plusn passing on the extra cost to the customer will never happen, as you will most likely decrease sales and loose more money that way instead of just cutting back on profits. Either way, comapanies don't like loosing money & multi discs is a giant leap backwards to the PS1 days.
Neither of your complaints about FFX and FFXII actually addressed the length or size of the games. Whether you liked FFXII or not is a subjective matter that has little to do with whether the game is multi-platform. And if you don't like the way FF was heading in the PS2 days, why do you care if the series is also on 360 now? Anyway, had you actually played FFXII, you would know that it was very easy to hit 100 hours. I did so without ever spending any time level grinding.
As for passing the cost on to the consumer, this is exactly how businesses function, so of course it will happen. Why do you think $60 has become the new standard for game costs? The HD era has made development very costly and companies are trying to make up the costs.
With respect to multi-disc being a "giant leap backwards" - if you can't deal with the minor inconvenience of getting your ass off the couch every 10-15 hours to switch a disc, you need to reevaluate your priorities.
Finally, please review your posts for spelling, grammar, and punctuation. I'm not looking for Shakespeare, but I shouldn't have to read your post 3 times before I can figure out what you're trying to say.