Shamgarr said:
Simply since you wrote a bunch, I will take up some of your points. I actually really like the ideas of group morale and competitive instincts, that was something I hadn't heard or considered. I disagree that religion has to represent death, I believe quite the opposite. I mean, they're in a world that just went from 6 billion people to 6 in a matter of 3 months, Death is prevalent and they all know it. Getting rid of religion due to "it bringing up death" it rediculous to claim for a world in which 6 billion graves are still fresh with dirt and radiation.
Are you truly willing to erase thousands of years of human progress and experience by killing the historian? Without him, they will have a very limited knowledge of all the triumphs, mistakes, and stories of the people of old, something that would be very important in boosting morale. I'm not saying they should brood on the past, but the children won't even know who they are in the grand scheme of things.
You're one of the first not to choose the athlete, I don't agree not disagree on that one.
The Starlet is important to me in that she holds within her the accumulation of human arts and beauty. I haven't met her, so I don't know her persona but I can imagine that a world without song, without dance, without drama, without poetry, all of which help humans express themselves.
Going back to the athlete, I think a world without sports would lead to a bunch of frustrates young boys without any outlet for their frustration. Not that sports wouldn't develope without the Olympian, just the huge variety which he has perfected would mostly be gone.
Does not the bio-chemist have an extensive knowledge of agriculture and food, something that would probably be pretty important after the food in the vault runs out after 3 months and the survivors find themselves in a strange world without any food.
the diffrence is you are looking at it from a philisophical standpoint which distorts both social sciences and psychology and ultimatly poorly represents reality as a whole. in your premise the concept that these few individuals will preserve all information in their assosiated fields is rather false. regardless of their ultimate role, time by any measure degrades all knowledge.
think back 2500 years. architechs, artists, sculptors, writers, historians. they too all existed, yet we have forgotten how buildings from that time period where built. how or what the art acctually ment, what was written acctually said, and what the acctual history of those people so long ago really was. time has washed away our knowledge of ancient cultures, even though decendents of the scribes, sculptors, artists, and historians still live in the lands of their ancestors.
many a time, with the loss of all knowledge, humanity will relearn its craft and trade (see Dark ages as opposed to ancient classical era). Music and the arts will re-emerge years down the line regardless of weither or not the starlet survived in the bunker, science will surface as those decendents wish knowledge even if the bio-chemist died in the nuclear holocost, and the history of mankind will continue to exist so long as mankind exists. though lost and forgotten by those that live today (see any ancient culture no longer in existance)
myself, realizing that petty things like 'knowledge' is not a proper moniker for allowing survival, decided to build a survival group which has the highest possible presentage of survival weeding out psychological negatives such as depression, anxiety, stress, desperation, and alpha desires. by attempting to lower these negatives i in turn increase the groups dynamic at working togeather, reduce the chance of suicide, and make the group more cautious and aware increasing the chances of the groups survival, and ultimatly the survival of man kind as a whole.
on relgion...
no matter which which way you look at it, modern Religion is synonomus with death. judeo-christian beleifs (encompassing all judisim, christianity, and islamic religions) speak at length of death and the life after at the core of their belief structures. only when you go to more define branches of each religion do they become diffrent as each religion describes their own path, rites, and rituals to achieve a 'good' or 'honorable' after life at death or the penelties upon your death that you are granted for not doing these things. even though ultimatly many modern religions speak at length on how one should live, the core of thoes reigions is dipped deeply in death.
to critizie yours from a psychological, logical, and social standpoint which mine is based in.
Shamgarr said:
I just realized I didn't put my own opinion!
I would save:
the librarian because he basically represents human literature over the thousands of years since writing was used.
the Athlete because his strength would be reproduced.
The historian since he is the only source of Earth's history, without him all would be lost.
The Starlet since she represents the arts, and these are important to culture, and could reproduce with the Athelete for some nice babies.
The Med student since we need a physcian.
And the Rabbi since he represents religion, which I believe to be essential in a developing culture.
this group would not survive the post-nuclear world the way you think it would.
we will presume that the sexual equiality is there on the assumption that the med student is female as well, providing the 4/2 sexual equiality needed for basic society to progress.
since you have touched on the positives i will focus on the negatives.
the librarian-
after losing not only his wife but his unborn child his psychological state is more or less shattered. depression, anxiety, and suicidal tendencies will easily find its ways into this individual as he has lost everything. in his mind he has absolutely nothing left to live for. he will become distant from every one else, spending much time alone thinking about his lost love. the wealth of his knowledge will be lost as he will not talk of it or any one about it as he is dipped so deeply in sorrow.
the athelete-
ultimatly he will take the leadership role and assume the alpha dominence in the group. in doing such he will ensure breeding rights to both the starlet and med student. this increased agression as well as dominence of the group females will increase the anxiety and stress of every one in the group.
the historian-
older in age, he is unable to physically keep pace with the younger individuals. his ultimate role in the after nuke world would be limited. his knowledge of history would lead to minor forms of depression as he knows clearly of 'the better time' looking back on the past constantly he loses track of the future. anxiety and depression would also be compounded as the athlete presumes dominence and he realises exactly what culture that he is mimicing (totaltarianism government). being older he is less able to reproduce with the females, also he is much closer to his own death, reducing the group number to 5 only a few years after they exit the vault.
the starlet-
even if we presume she is not a sychophant her life afterwords will still be a shadow of its former self. depression will take grasp of her completely as she is thrusted into the role of reproducer (baby maker). impregnation with out love or compasion, but rather out of necessity, she will see herself as less than human. her mind darkened and her heart broken she will not be able to remake such beautiful art as she once was. broken in shattered in her mind she regresses quietly into her assumed role as mearly a beautiful peice of meat.
med-student- (assumed female)
agression is more likely to fill her than depression. as a learned individual she is more prone to defending herself even though by the group dynamic she is demanded to enter the reproductive role. regardless, anxiety, depression, and a lot of stress will overcome this individual. like the starlet she will slowly degred psychologically as she will see herself as less than human. her spite will be carried towards those that forced her into such a position and ultimatly her role as primary medical individual will be greatly limited as such. it is possible that she may even kill the athelete through her own medical means as an attempt at revenge.
the Rabbi-
like the historian, he will see the bligths that are commited by his fellow man, but being only one individual and peiceful about his endevors, he will suffer to do nothing. he will preach and pray, console and condemn, but ultimatly his words will fall on deaf ears. he will suffer from depression realizing that his religious word and fervor is lost on this group, the depressed librarian that will not hear him, the historian and med student too smart for him, the athlete too consumed with his own dominence, and the starlet to lost in her own sorrow. he will continue to speak, at length, further condemning the path the group is taking, but will be unable to change its course. he will segregate himself from the group turning to introspective prayer thinking that this is a test of his person laid upon him by god.
so of the group of 6.
3 segregate themselves from the group.
the one alpha male presumes dominence over the two females, and as culture is rebuilt females have a much deminished role and are not as equial. and even in your actions to try and save the wealth of information held for each all this information is lost as culture rebuilds itself anew of a limited base that is unwilling to learn anything but physical strength and dominence. the new society will have a deminished capacity for females and the group will presume more nomadic roles as tribal dominance is created through feats of strength and physical prowess rather than knowledge or capability.
anger, anxiety, and backstabbing may also become second nature (if med-student murders)