The sheer amount of things wrong with your post are unbelievable. For starters, CoD is not the only game in existence. You'll need more than one example. And to say that CoD 2 is better than the modern ones is entirely subjective. A poll held on this very website showed that CoD4 is the favourite around here, so make of that what you will.Xzi said:Yea...because MW2 and Black Ops were so much better than CoD 2, amirite? Or were there just more shinies added and features dropped?Super Toast said:Fixed for you. You can thank me later.Xzi said:Translation: Increased the amount of money going into developers and publishers pockets, therefore increasing the quality of games with each passing year.Super Toast said:Consoles have simply made gaming more accessible and mainstream.
That's what I thought. If these developers were to spend the extra revenue to create something original and feature-rich, that would be a different story. Instead they just take the money and churn out a "new" version of the same FPS we've played a million times already each year. To please the lowest common denominator. Namely, console kiddies who really like titties and explosions.
I won't go so far to say that nothing good has come from consoles, but the majority of stuff worth playing is brought to us by the indie developers (see avatar). Roughly the same amount of decent products are released by indie devs on the PC, however, and they don't have charges imposed upon them by services like XBL.
Secondly, you act as if there are no unique games on consoles today. That is a blatant lie. Brutal Legend, Limbo, Deathspank, Mass Effect, Uncharted, Borderlands, Assassin's Creed and Red Dead Redemption were all on consoles and are all fantastic original properties. I know a couple of those were on the PC, but my point still stands.
Some amazing games come out on the PC, others on consoles, and to deny that would be blatant fanboyism. (Yay for made up words)