There are a lot of misconceptions here I feel I must address. Not that I'm in complete disagreement with every assertion, it's just some are woefully off-base.
ExiusXavarus said:
Because most people find consoles to be cheaper overall. People can spend $300 on a PS3 or whatever it is on an Xbox and jump right into games like Crysis. ANd you never ever have to upgrade a console. But for you to get a PC like that, you either have to make your own for like, $700-1300(depending on component and where you obtain them) and continually spend more money to upgrade your pc. People buy consoles out of convenience, simply because they're easier to work with, and easier on your wallet.
Again, this whole "PCs are more expensive" thing is ludicrous at best. I'm not going to repeat myself, just read above. As a side note, Crysis 2 is the only "crysis" game on consoles and it's been severely downgraded, in every regard (not just graphically) to even be able to run on today's consoles. So I hardly consider that a defining factor. Also, I spend no more money "upgrading" my rig every 5+ years then you do on replacing, obtaining, and maintaining your own console. So...sort of a moot point as well.
[edit] All of this said, I'm not saying no one has a valid point in choosing console gaming over PC gaming. I have a gaming rig but also own a DS and a 360. (and many more consoles prior) And, I'm on a strict budget. So, please, don't take this as some ramblings from a PC elitist who's decreeing, "Consoles suck!" On the contrary. I love my console gaming. I'm simply pointing out that much of the complaints about why PC gaming is such a hassle are unfounded. It all just comes down to preference.