Why do people scream "Feminist Agenda" when there is a female lead?

Recommended Videos

The Bucket

Senior Member
May 4, 2010
531
0
21
WinterWyvern said:
runic knight said:
Maybe I am not visiting the right places online, but I have never actually seen the whole "I am mad this character is female because they are female" thing actually occur in the wild.

The official Twitter account of the new Ghostbuster movie is full of people complaining that it's a feminist movie because the lead characters are women.

Much worse, the new Mad Max was considered a "feminist" movie only because it happened to have a female lead next to the prominent male lead.

What do you think about it?
People call Mad Max a feminist action movie because it had a feminist consultant who called it a feminist action movie to the media, I dont see what that's meant to be an indication of. And the Ghostbusters thing is packed up in the usual reboot change stuff
 

The Lunatic

Princess
Jun 3, 2010
2,291
0
0
Why are movies or games hailed as a "Triumph of feminism" for doing the same thing?

Just people being daft.
 

Gengisgame

New member
Feb 15, 2015
276
0
0
Never said I'm a feminist, nor that I totally support all of their views and ideas. In fact because I'm trans and very feminine I get attacked all the time for being "stereotypical". Now then things like "killallmen" and "diecisscum" aren't about actual hostility, it's about venting and comical hyperbole. Are there people that think that all men, or/and cisgneder folk should be rounded up, put in concentration camps, and possibly systematically murdered? Yes, but then again there are rabid crazies in every ideology. When it comes to groups like trans folk and feminists, who actually have limited social power, along with the fact that most of whom are reasonable individuals... Well such memes are nothing more than expressions of frustration, because such groups aren't really trying eliminate others.

That's besides the fact that as trans person I get to see first hand the issues feminism has with internationality and how it damages the feminist cause.

[/quote]

My point was I am not here to talk about the crazies, people just use them as a deflection.

Gengisgame said:
Feminists are effecting positive change, in fact feminist organizations are active all over the world, doing things like helping both boys and girls in developing nations with health campaigns. Like providing education and sanitary supplies. Source: We Hunted the Mammoth, because it has lots of external references that back the point up. [http://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2015/12/15/sorry-mens-rights-activists-feminists-actually-do-care-about-girls-in-africa/]

The whole feminism has become hostile to men argument has never made any bloody sense, because the history of feminism is one of receiving hostility from men, backed up with false claims of exclusionary behavior. Now some feminist groups are hostile to men, but then some are hostile to trans folk, others to people of color, and so on. I'm not going to deny that feminism has a massive internationality issue, one that causes lots of internal feuding too; however, mainstream feminism isn't hostile to men, it's in fact very inclusive. Most of the time.
When we talk about feminism we almost exclusively mean what it does in the western world, feminism abroad is effectively it's own separate thing with little connection between the 2.

Except that isn't true, feminism would have not been able to exist as a movement without the support of men. Sorry but mainstream feminism is hostile to men, when a british MP who heavily identifies as feminist openly laughs at the idea of looking into mens issues and male sexuality is villified as inherently sexist with a ton of double standards then there is a problem.

Except I didn't call "anti-feminists" evil, I even went so far as to clarify that it's a loud minority of "anti-feminists" who are the ones causing issues. I also didn't hold feminism up as this infallible noble cause either. In fact I mentioned and called out the fact that just like with "anti-feminists", there is a loud minority of feminists who do the exact same thing. The way you've misrepresented me thus far is making a strawman of my statements.

That said I've never seen any rabid type of "anti-feminist", like Dean Esmay, Roosh V, or Paul Elam chased from their homes by a concentrated feminist campaign of doxxing, harassment, stalking, and threats of death and rape. Yet that very thing has happened to a staggering number of feminists, including very reasonable ones. So no calling out the minority of "anti-feminists" who do terrible illegal things to others is not a strawman.[/quote]

To quote you "The "anti-feminist" side is probably even worse" and on feminists "The "feminist" side a is group doesn't really understand feminist philosophy, but still uses it to voice their dissatisfaction. The tend not to do any harm"

and then you go on to give me a list specifically of anti-feminists who did bad things and don't do the same for feminist, you are horribly biased and pretended to be otherwise so don't say I misrepresented you..

Gengisgame said:
That is called hype, there are a lot of people who get excited about female leads in video games and movies, because it's fairly uncommon in comparison to male leads.

Now the female good/male bad mentality isn't a majority opinion amongst feminists, it's a fringe minority, mostly composed of people who are actively working against feminist philosophy from within. Most feminists have no problem with men, they have problems with society being geared to advantage men and disadvantage women.

So thus far this has been a series of misrepresenting my stance, which is fairly neutral, as a pro-feminist gush so it can easily be knocked down. That is the very definition of a strawman.
If the views where just held by posters on forums it would be fringe but I just pointed out that these views are expressed in various major news and gaming sites and yet you are saying that it's fringe among feminists, it's a simple fact that I as a straight white male where to make a game with a straight white male I would be criticized for doing so because they feel that I should have made my game for others, that's f*cked up and a commonly held view.

You are far from neutral but if you want to be I want you to try and see where I am coming from here on this last point, that's all that really matters, the rest is just fluff and issues that have little relevance to the OP.
 

KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime

Lolita Style, The Best Style!
Jan 12, 2010
2,151
0
0
sheppie said:
That sounds like a claim in need of good statistical evidence.

At the very least find us a few hundred prominent feminists who loathe 3rd wave feminism.
So you're asking me to go find statistics on a nebulous ideological group and to do extensive research for your satisfaction?


Seriously though, equating all of modern feminism with radical feminism isn't a stance I can take seriously.

sheppie said:
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
These people are generally called radical feminists, or "radfems", [..] Which if we're being completely honest aren't actually feminists, nor are they radical in ideology.
That's a no true scotsman fallacy. You don't get to simply say "They don't fit my narrative, so they're arbitrarily not feminists".

What you're doing here is trying to create a false definition of feminism as only being 1st wave feminism and some elements of 2nd wave feminism, and not including anything other than that.

We're talking about a modern group and ideology, and what they do in terms of cause and effect. In that it is clear that feminism is anti-equality.
A "no true scotsman" fallacy would be applicable if radical feminists followed even the most basic ideas of feminism. Instead they dive into biological essentialist rhetoric in order to enforce gender norms that the majority of feminists find toxic.

Also I said nothing about excluding second, or third wave feminism. I only spoke of the trend of Trans and Sex Worker Exclusionary Radical Feminists, along with sex-negative feminists, to be actively working against gender equality.

Now for feminism being anti-equality... What the what!? Demand for equal representation, equal time, equal pay, and equal treatment is anti-equality? Well that's news to me.

sheppie said:
Here's another example of a sexist law made under feminist pressure:
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-30208400

And a sexist grant from which all men are barred:
http://www.aaas.org/page/international-funding-opportunities-women-ste
While the first is an indefensibly sexist law, it's because it's pandering, assuming women cannot get these jobs on merit alone. Still one law to add a 10% boost based on gender, in one already pretty over regulated country, a global anti-equality conspiracy does not make.

Now for the other link: *GASP!* A third party, independent, non-profit organization is offering grants to a women! Many of whom live in places they can't qualify scholarships for sciences and engineering, or sometimes even higher education, fields that are already very exclusionary to women and that women are discouraged from pursuing? Fields that are also very easy for men to get scholarships, grants, and financial aid for, fields that are dominated by men? The horror! How sexist of them to encourage women to pursue scientific and engineering education, and to help them financially if they qualify! That's like if they offered special grants and scholarships to underprivileged racial minorities who couldn't otherwise afford higher education! Oh the injustice! [/obvious_sarcasm]
 

KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime

Lolita Style, The Best Style!
Jan 12, 2010
2,151
0
0
Gengisgame said:
The one thing I'll point out here, because that entire attempt at a quote deconstruction was a mess that my dyslexic brain has too much trouble sorting...

I brought up major anti-feminist voices, who I didn't say them selves did bad things. You accuse me of saying they did awful things. All I said is that they weren't chased from their homes with death and rape threats, doxxing, harassment, and stalking... Like say what happened to Anita Sarkeesian, Zoe Quinn, and many many other prominent feminists have been. Again I didn't Say Roosh V, or Dean Esmay, or Paul Elam did any horrible things themselves, and they haven't as far as I'm aware. Sure they say things I find awful and disagreeable, but with the possible exception of Roosh(whom I thin is full of bullshit on his claims anyways), I'm not aware of any prominent MRA, MGHOW, redpiller, or any anti-feminist type doing anything "bad" and by bad I mean blatantly illegal; however, I'm also not aware of any of them ever being chased from their homes by concentrated hate campaigns that break anti-stalking and anti-threat laws.

Edit: That's not bias either, it's fact. I've never heard of such thing happening to the one side like they frequently happen to the other.
 

IceForce

Is this memes?
Legacy
Dec 11, 2012
2,384
16
13
sheppie said:
IceForce said:
Hold up, YOU were the one who claimed that "pro-censorship, anti-gamers, pro-sexism and pro-discrimination" make up the "vast majority" of feminists. Where's YOUR statistical evidence?
If I give you a series of examples that proves we're dealing with at least a visible majority, will you accept that, or ignore it because you're looking to reduce this to nitpicking?
Holding someone to their own standards is "nitpicking" now? Because that's all I'm doing, I'm holding you to the same standards which you're demanding of others.

Apparently YOU'RE allowed to throw out unsubstantiated claims and rhetoric, but the moment anyone tries to dispute it you tell them they need to provide "statistical evidence", -- something that you didn't actually provide yourself for your initial claim.

Go and look up 'burden of proof' on google. It will be rather enlightening I think.

sheppie said:
Let's start with one example of a feminist calling for the oppression of an entire sexual orientation, because that silly guy happened to me in my Youtube list of 'watch again' suggestions:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Etw8QmH23i4
One example =/= "the vast majority", so already we're off to a rather poor start.

What you've done here is the equivalent of posting an ISIS video and claiming that all muslims are exactly like that.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
The Lunatic said:
Why are movies or games hailed as a "Triumph of feminism" for doing the same thing?

Just people being daft.
I think that's more grasping at straws, and/or patting people on the back for a vague amount of lipservice.
 

KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime

Lolita Style, The Best Style!
Jan 12, 2010
2,151
0
0
thaluikhain said:
The Lunatic said:
Why are movies or games hailed as a "Triumph of feminism" for doing the same thing?

Just people being daft.
I think that's more grasping at straws, and/or patting people on the back for a vague amount of lipservice.
This, so much this. A lot of people are ready to pat backs because of a perception of being progressive, even when that example of "progress" really isn't progressive and when said "progress" is also counter productive.
 

Fallow

NSFB
Oct 29, 2014
423
0
0
undeadsuitor said:
Because straight white male is the default entity (after decades of cheap narrow marketing) and thus any character outside that frame needs solid justification on why they aren't that. And god forbid something is TWO somethings away from straight white male.

Also, ironically, straight white males have trouble projecting themselves onto characters who don't look like them, while asking everyone not like them to project onto a straight white male.
I would love to get a source on this, because everything I've heard and seen, and every study I've found, points to the complete opposite.
 

Fallow

NSFB
Oct 29, 2014
423
0
0
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
thaluikhain said:
The Lunatic said:
Why are movies or games hailed as a "Triumph of feminism" for doing the same thing?

Just people being daft.
I think that's more grasping at straws, and/or patting people on the back for a vague amount of lipservice.
This, so much this. A lot of people are ready to pat backs because of a perception of being progressive, even when that example of "progress" really isn't progressive and when said "progress" is also counter productive.
I think that is a sad result of the times we live in. The product doesn't really matter as long as it is ideologically pure (well, interpreted as being so). I also think it's a great example of the horseshoe model.
 

Politrukk

New member
May 5, 2015
605
0
0
Parasondox said:
Well its true. Darth Vader's pullout game is weak.

You know what internet, what's the matter? Should we go outside, and play some catch? Talking about the emotions we are feeling inside because its not good to keep them inside, Lil' Jimmy? This "Feminist Agenda" anger you are going through isn't something that normal internet users go through. You seem hurt. Are you afraid of something? It's okay if you are. Your mom and I have been talking and we just think it's best you go to your aunts for the weekend upstate. It's away from the city, away from WiFi and the internet and you can feel some sort of freedom away from the anger. What do you say Lil' Guy?

All seriousness though, what is up with people? Allow me to pick your brains. Dont worry, I may be a zombie but I have gluten free brains.

I get it. Some people really dislike feminism. As soon as that word comes up, out comes the anger, the hate, the colourful words, the paranoia, the "dey tok r jeeeeeeerbs" attitude. A female is the focus of an IP. So what? Whys that a problem? If its the poor writing where writers assume all women suffer the same thing, I understand. It's shitty poor writing. However, if its cause they are getting more screen time and story is developed more then... then calm the fuck down.

From Mad Max Fury Road to Jessica Jones and now Star Wars, I just see comments about "Feminist Agenda" and how they are trying to... control our minds with their powerful vaginas? Damn vaginas. Beautiful but deadly.

I dunno. I just wanted to ask.
Simple answer to your thread title:

Because we've been getting too many token female leads.

Why did Thor have to become a woman?
Why did we need an all female ghost busters reboot?
Why exactly from all of Marvels characters did they pick the damaged lady the black guy and the white guy who they're considering turning into an asian guy(even though it's a logical change).


Personally I don't mind the diversity but I can understand where some of the outrage is coming from especially when already established properties are being changed instead of introducing new ones.
 

JimB

New member
Apr 1, 2012
2,180
0
0
Parasondox said:
I just wanted to ask.
There are a lot of reasons, but in absence of a specific individual's complaints to look at, I assume the anger is generated by the uncomfortable intersection of empathy and selfishness.

When someone points out that they have a problem you don't, mammalian empathy instincts kick in. You generally feel bad for that person. On an individual scale, this kind of thing works out great, because empathy will often cause you to work to help that person. It's my general experience, though, that when the problem is on a broader scale, people will get angry if you point out a problem, and I think this is because they realize on a subconscious level that there's more they could be doing to solve the problem, but they'd rather not do it because they're selfish and investing one's time and resources into effecting change is hard, so they convince themselves the person with the problem is wrong, evil, and attacking them personally. A woman wants a video game for herself? She's trying to get the United Nations to take our games! Homeless people are getting more numerous on your drive to work? Fuck them, they're not actually homeless, they're just scam artists standing out in December weather to get rich off donations! Unarmed, nonviolent black people are getting killed by the police in alarming numbers? Nuh-uh, they're just a bunch of lying college babies who hate the First Amendment and want to censor us! You're a vegetarian? More like you're a ****** judging me for eating meat, and you probably suck dicks while shoving carrots up your ass!

The issue of denial becomes more intractable because generally speaking, anger feels good. It released a rush of exciting chemicals into the brain that a lot of people will want to feel again, so instead of just denying the problem when they see it, they'll focus on it and build an ideology around it that allows them to dehumanize their enemies and chase that rush all the time; and that's how we get threads like the one on this very forum about how Jessica Jones is a show pushing a radical feminist agenda (which no it's not, because "radical feminism" is a specific ideology and not just an insult to throw at uppity bitches). People learn to forget the difference between not being pandered to and being oppressed, and they learn to forget the difference between feeling oppressed and being right, and that illogical mindset can be shortened to "I'm right because they're wrong," so that everything the so-oppressed man in this hypothetical situation thinks is correct by definition, just as everything his enemy thinks is wrong by definition and probably also an evil to be railed against to boot.

Then the internet enters into it, a place where people can say whatever they want without shame because they don't have to look their audience in the eye and see the judgment there. Like-minded people gather together and now the anger being generated inside one person isn't the only positive reinforcement you get for this ideology of victimhood; now you're being rewarded with camaraderie, praise, and agreement by your fellows for taking up the banner of hating women and their pussy-whipped white knight slaves.

It's all very insidious, and it's all inevitable, and it's so self-perpetuating there's really no way to break through to people once they've decided to take this course. There is no amount of kindly-intended, compassion-driven, carefully-worded persuasion that can convince them you're not out to hurt them or take anything away from them because like I said at the beginning, they're already feeling attacked by their own consciences, and they need to project that attack onto you.

This post is more disjointed than I'd like, but I'm trying to spit it all out before I have to go to work (which was about two minutes ago), so I apologize for the lack of polish here. If you'd like me to expand on any of my ideas, please let me know.
 

Ihateregistering1

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,034
0
0
Parasondox said:
From Mad Max Fury Road to Jessica Jones and now Star Wars, I just see comments about "Feminist Agenda" and how they are trying to... control our minds with their powerful vaginas? Damn vaginas. Beautiful but deadly.

I dunno. I just wanted to ask.
Because this is the internet, and if you look hard enough you can find people bitching about literally anything imaginable. That doesn't make it some sort of enormous widespread phenomenon.

I can post an article about how My Little Pony is racist. The fact that a handful of people believe something doesn't make it a widespread belief.
 

anthony87

New member
Aug 13, 2009
3,727
0
0
Oh god I hope that first line isn't a reference to something to do with The Force Awakens because it's the only line I read before stopping myself and haven't seen the movie yet.
 

MrFalconfly

New member
Sep 5, 2011
913
0
0
Can't we just agree that if a character is well written then it ISN'T a feminist/MRA agenda trying to screw something up?
 

JimB

New member
Apr 1, 2012
2,180
0
0
Politrukk said:
Why did Thor have to become a woman? Why did we need an all female Ghostbusters reboot? Why exactly from all of Marvel's characters did they pick the damaged lady, the black guy, and the white guy who they're considering turning into an Asian guy(even though it's a logical change)?
These are extremely arbitrary complaints that only make sense if you assume "white male" is a default which requires no justification, but anyone not being white and male better have a damn good reason for it.
 

Dizchu

...brutal
Sep 23, 2014
1,277
0
0
I wish the people that claimed that Jessica Jones or Mad Max: Fury Road or even the new Star Wars film are "feminist propaganda" had some self-awareness.

Aren't you the same people that get upset about Anita Sarkeesian claiming games are misogynistic because, if their "damsel-in-distress" themes are taken to the extreme, they become abuse and male entitlement?

How is "this protagonist is a white hetero male purely to pander to audiences" any different from "this protagonist is black/female/gay purely to pander to SJWs"? I mean some good arguments can be made against tokenism but all I see is hypocritical whining.