Cody211282 said:
kurupt87 said:
Err, no it's not that simple. While yes, things like theft and murder are generally accepted and thought of as bad, it's because it inconviences/causes harm to people, and so we are brought up to see these things as wrong.
They are not good or evil in themselves, they are an action that someone has taken. Peoples opinions of the action though, that is what makes something good or bad, and the reasons behind those actions.
I know, I'm bringing up Hitler, but w/e. Killing Hitler before he came into power, that'd be an undeniably good thing to do, right? Imagine the untold millions of lives that would be saved.
Hang on, what about Hitler himself? He sure as shit wouldn't see this as a good thing to do. Neither would Germans of the time before the war, or alot of the world when looking at it morally. He had good policies and ideas when he came to power and was trying to drag Germany out of the shit it was in from after The Great War.
Stealing all the guns from the people that mean us harm is an undeniably good thing, right?
Again, think of the suffering that you'd stop.
From their perspective though it'd be bad, for whatever reason they would have to think that they are in the right, "they" have a reason for opposing the eponymous "us". It's a difference in society at some level, and what the societies hold dear, and it doesn't come down to what is "right", and never will. Such a thing doesn't exist. It comes down to whoever has the biggest stick, and is willing to use it.
I'll start with your killing Hitler argument, this is put in the area of good because you are saving lives by doing it, no he wouldn't like it but since he killed so many people your actions are justified to save the majority.
The problem is what he is saying isn't about saving lives it's about being to lazy to get another hobby or wait until the person has the money, they are doing it for self gratification and that's what makes it wrong.
So you accept that good and bad are human opinions on things, that's good.
I'm sorry, but did you just imply that laziness has something to do with what somebody enjoys? I don't see that myself, at least not in the context you're using. While I can understand a lazy person would not be inclined toward sport, to imply that someone is lazy because they enjoy something and won't change what they enjoy
because of that laziness is bizarre.
Doing something else because of financial difficulties is a definite option though, but wouldn't guarantee the amount of enjoyment of your preferred past-time.
Ok, lets ditch the "too poor to buy" person, and look at your average pirate. Now, this person pirates the game because it's free, and has little to no risk involved. This pirate has limited funds, as we all (or most of us) do. The amount of games he pirates would never be equal to the amount games he'd buy if piracy didn't exist, no way. Your normal person will only buy games that they know, or strongly hope, they will enjoy. A pirate will pirate various games on very little basis, games which he'd never buy. It, again, comes down to a lose/lose for the developer, either way no one anyway gets any benefit from it, apart from the pirate.
Your issue it seems, is that the pirate gains, not that the developers lose out. This is a non starter for a point of view really. The central point of your argument is that this unknown pirate gains from doing something that you consider bad and won't do. Also in some cases, that they gain from something that they got for free something that you paid for. Can you not look at that dispassionatly and realise that that is selfish? It doesn't affect you, or anyone else, at all. You just want him not to have enjoyment because he did something you don't like.
I do believe that someone that has pirated a game, and has enjoyed the game, should buy it as soon as they can. I also believe that, outside of the demo argument that some here have given, someone who pirates a game that they
would normally buy is doing wrong.
Pffft, this is getting a bit complex. It comes down to morals vs money really, the two don't go together so well. Money is a necessary evil, something that people need, giving value to things in a way that is understood by all. It's also a way to control people, again something that is needed but is bad and is constantly abused. Gahh, I'll stop on that issue.