I know right?ThrobbingEgo said:As a Canadian, I'm glad I have it. Too bad we're all poverty stricken and crippled by taxes in this communist dystopia. /lol
Yeah. It's a good thing that the "no subsidized healthcare" policy kept America from being hit by the recession.
I highly doubt your paying taxes.Pirate Kitty said:Kortney said:Also, what would be bad about everyone paying higher taxes? It's an irrational fear. Countries in Europe with 90% tax rates are some of the best places in the world to live.
As I said, if you want to give away money, go for it.
Considering how little the government does with it and how much they piss away, I'll keep mine, thanks.
The US is already one of the lowest-taxed first-world countries (if not the lowest), you've got the slack there to comfortably afford universal healthcare. I dunno where your doubling taxes thing comes from - source?Pirate Kitty said:Another of my comments:Wicky_42 said:Guess who pays? Everyone! Through small taxes! Just like the roads, the police force, the army and all those politicians. You may not drive, but your taxes still go towards the roads. You may never crash, but your insurance money may still be used by the firm to cover someone disabled for life by a collision. You may never be robbed, but you still pay for the police to do their job.Pirate Kitty said:Do you want to pay for it?
Money has to come from somewhere.
Socialised/nationalised health is basically health insurance for everyone, paid in taxes. You're always covered, you never have to really worry about affording any treatment, and in the event that you get hit by some completely life-shattering disease or are permanently disabled for life, your treatment is subsidised by the entire country.
Such a civilised solution, I really can't understand the attitudes of people like you who seem to think that this is money from nowhere, or that ill people somehow are suddenly greedy bastards now that they can see the benefit of socialised healthcare in saving their life affordably. Imagine if it was your own family - have a little damn empathy!
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.245628-Why-do-some-people-think-free-healthcare-is-bad?page=2#8984791
That's where the money comes from - your tax.
'Free' healthcare = everyone, regardless of if you ever use it, paying more in taxes.
And taxes are insane as it is; the more you earn, the more you pay for other people's healthcare.
Hence why I said 'sort of agree with'. While no one would want to give an alcoholic a new liver, especially if he is just going to wreck the new one, creating a system to judge whether it was brought upon by their own idiotic actions and thus punish them would likely cause more problems than just giving this alcoholic a new liver. The system would have to be well thought out and lenient before I'd consider it something worth implementing.Turing said:So, what exactly? Who decides whether you brought on yourself? Imagine I was diagnosed with a severe depression through no fault of my own, am unable to work and don't have the money for or medicine.10BIT said:That's not what he's saying. He's saying if you don't earn enough, then you don't deserve healthcare, not if you brought the problem upon yourself (a statement I could sort of agree with). His statement is ultra-conservative, not libertarian.
Is it alright that I spiral into possible insane hobo-ism if I lived in America and couldn't get help?
Yes, but under a 'free' health system, you could end up paying less taxes and getting a better service than you currently do, as is shown in every other developed country. It would take time to get there, but it is certainly possible.Pirate Kitty said:And taxes are insane as it is; the more you earn, the more you pay for other people's healthcare.
Do you live in one of those countries?Kortney said:Situations like the one described in that thread don't happen in the UK. Nor Australia as far as I'm aware.Pirate Kitty said:That isn't free healthcare - you still pay an amount when you use health services.Kortney said:Yes, actually. That's why I am pro-taxes. In fact, I do pay for it - we all do in this country. Same happens in your country, Australia, as far as I'm aware.Pirate Kitty said:Do you want to pay for it?
Free healthcare would need to be covered completely by taxes.
You may want to double your taxes, but I do not.
Also, what would be bad about everyone paying higher taxes? It's an irrational fear. Countries in Europe with 90% tax rates are some of the best places in the world to live.
No Health Insurance is good 30% of the working class's paycheck ($10-15 here is average for blue collars in FL, especially during this economy), that's after taxes. On top of that most employers pay half of that cost, which works out to a total of 60% on ones income. It's bad enough to the point where every painting company I have worked for required me to get license as independent contractor (hell one boss made me 1% owner of company so he could dodge offering me health insurance) so I would have to pay for it myself without assistance.Roganwilson said:I have a question: Is the average amount that an American spends on health insurance annually less than the taxes they would have to pay if there was a universal health-care system? I think that this would be a good thing to look at.
To me, a universal health-care system would be a great thing. I'm more than happy to pay for someone to get help, just as they are happy to help me. And if it means helping someone who can't help me, so be it. There is no reason we can't share. Also, what we are spending about half our money on is the military. Do we really need F-22 Raptors to fight insurgents with weapons made 30 years ago? I don't think so. If we scaled down our military spending (one smart bomb costs about $25,000, and a Raptor costs $150 million), think of the money that would then be able to be put into other programs.
Here is England everyone is entitled to free health care, in theory it is great but the NHS has been under a lot of strain considering the huge and unneeded funding cuts under the new governments. The bottom line is everyone at least is covered and if you don't want to be covered, just buy your own health insurance.MortisLegio said:ninja'dPirate Kitty said:Do you want to pay for it?
Money has to come from somewhere.
And if you do, them go to a hospital and start handing out cash.
but yeah and there are a few problems with it
Who gets it?
Whats it cover?
How much will it cost(in taxes)?
will it actually fix anything?
Socialised medicine does include Triage you know.... If your standing there missing half your face its a pretty safe bet you'll be brought to the front of the Queue and seen immediately.Guitarmasterx7 said:The reasons I can see against it are
1. Because it isn't actually FREE it's just that it comes out of taxes now
2. Have you ever been to an emergancy room? You know how you can be missing a face and you'll still have to wait 3 hours to get it sewn back on? That's WITH people "not being able to afford healthcare."
Though the reason most idiots give is "It's like communism"
I have a feeling that cultural attitudes are the problem here. Sweden is a different kind of first-world country than the US, where taxes work to distribute the wealth so that everyone has extremely comfortable lives, and even if they earn very little, every essential is provided for them.Wicky_42 said:The US is already one of the lowest-taxed first-world countries (if not the lowest), you've got the slack there to comfortably afford universal healthcare. I dunno where your doubling taxes thing comes from - source?Pirate Kitty said:Another of my comments:Wicky_42 said:Guess who pays? Everyone! Through small taxes! Just like the roads, the police force, the army and all those politicians. You may not drive, but your taxes still go towards the roads. You may never crash, but your insurance money may still be used by the firm to cover someone disabled for life by a collision. You may never be robbed, but you still pay for the police to do their job.Pirate Kitty said:Do you want to pay for it?
Money has to come from somewhere.
Socialised/nationalised health is basically health insurance for everyone, paid in taxes. You're always covered, you never have to really worry about affording any treatment, and in the event that you get hit by some completely life-shattering disease or are permanently disabled for life, your treatment is subsidised by the entire country.
Such a civilised solution, I really can't understand the attitudes of people like you who seem to think that this is money from nowhere, or that ill people somehow are suddenly greedy bastards now that they can see the benefit of socialised healthcare in saving their life affordably. Imagine if it was your own family - have a little damn empathy!
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.245628-Why-do-some-people-think-free-healthcare-is-bad?page=2#8984791
That's where the money comes from - your tax.
'Free' healthcare = everyone, regardless of if you ever use it, paying more in taxes.
And taxes are insane as it is; the more you earn, the more you pay for other people's healthcare.
What I do know is that Sweden has the highest happiness rating of the Western world, and it's the most socialist, with almost 50% taxes (yes, that includes universal healthcare). Does that tell you anything?