LMAO, I NEVER thought I'd hear F.A.T.A.L. be used to defend anything.moretimethansense said:For example: Take any tabletop RPG any at all and compare them to F.A.T.A.L,
So, no, use of F.A.T.A.L. as a comparison invokes Godwin's by over-exaggeration.RULE # 96 : To figure out how long it will take to write a novel or work of non-fiction @ C3 or C2 DP, you can use the soul equation for serious depth, else cloning equation. But, a much easier alternative would be or might be RULE # 3. But, for this stunt, a still more oversimplification of this might be [[(his C3 DP) / (your C3 DP)]*(time it took him to write his book)]. So, if he?s @ 50 C3 DP & it took him 5 years to write his book, and if you?re @ 10 C3 DP, then it should take you 5x this amount, meaning it should take you 25 years to write a similar book @ similar depth to that written by someone @ 50 C3 DP; but, this latter method or equation contradicts the soul equation, but doesn?t contradict the cloning equation, as predicted by RULE # 28. Look @ RULE # 1, # 18, #28, & # 34 for soul equation vs. cloning equation, else RULE # 3.
Fair enough, though that little ditty you posted made my point for me anyway.The_root_of_all_evil said:LMAO, I NEVER thought I'd hear F.A.T.A.L. be used to defend anything.moretimethansense said:For example: Take any tabletop RPG any at all and compare them to F.A.T.A.L,
For those not in the know, F.A.T.A.L. is one of the three worst games in the universe, ever.
When asked why they'd made a "date rape" game, the makers argued about the word "date".
Just in case you wanted to know, Racial Holy War and HYBRID.
The first is obvious why it's so bad, the second...well...
So, no, use of F.A.T.A.L. as a comparison invokes Godwin's by over-exaggeration.RULE # 96 : To figure out how long it will take to write a novel or work of non-fiction @ C3 or C2 DP, you can use the soul equation for serious depth, else cloning equation. But, a much easier alternative would be or might be RULE # 3. But, for this stunt, a still more oversimplification of this might be [[(his C3 DP) / (your C3 DP)]*(time it took him to write his book)]. So, if he?s @ 50 C3 DP & it took him 5 years to write his book, and if you?re @ 10 C3 DP, then it should take you 5x this amount, meaning it should take you 25 years to write a similar book @ similar depth to that written by someone @ 50 C3 DP; but, this latter method or equation contradicts the soul equation, but doesn?t contradict the cloning equation, as predicted by RULE # 28. Look @ RULE # 1, # 18, #28, & # 34 for soul equation vs. cloning equation, else RULE # 3.
Read post 36 for my reasoning on how complexity ruined PC gaming for me.poiumty said:Oh no, of course it's not always a plus. But in the PC's situation, it IS.moretimethansense said:Complexity is not always a plus and can often be a detriment.poiumty said:And this is why they are better.computers are a HELL OF A LOT MORE COMPLEX THAN A CONSOLE
So, I think it is really not a complicated subject. Consoles really only have the advantage of being simple. This is a pretty major advantage in some areas, for sure. However When it comes to what you CAN do with a PC, the ceiling is just a lot higher.bfgmetalhead said:some PC gamers seem to be very arrogant about their platform.I cna't remember how many times i've been told by pc gamers that 'their' platform is 'better' than a console. To be honest I have played games on pc and I do see the advantages to it, but, for instance I play team fortress on xbox and on PC and I do like the stuff the updates added I just prefer the xbox version.I just don't like the over complication and I have been told the lag and low screen rate I suffer from are due to my low spec machine but to be frank computers are a HELL OF A LOT MORE COMPLEX THAN A CONSOLE. Plus they are more expensive I could just buy an xbox for cheap rather than dish out a ton for a pc
So could we disscuss if the pc does deserve to be top dog, or should it just share the spot with the consoles
Here's the thing though, it most certainly did die on your for a reason, you just don't know what it is.moretimethansense said:I have spent the past week trying in vain to fix my broken ass PC which decided to up and die on me for no reason whatsoever, causing me to lose 600 GB of data, and having to install and re-install Windows twice today alone, even now as I type this I don't know if the problem is solved or has simply gone in to remission, while my Xbox, PS2 and PS3 have sat there working allowing me to blow off the anger this infernal device has caused me over the past few days so I'd say no in fact PCs are not clearly better, they merely have advantages, they also have severe disadvantages as does any console out there, there is no best, there is merely a best for you.
Im going to break it down. This is not a complicated argument.bfgmetalhead said:some PC gamers seem to be very arrogant about their platform.I cna't remember how many times i've been told by pc gamers that 'their' platform is 'better' than a console. To be honest I have played games on pc and I do see the advantages to it, but, for instance I play team fortress on xbox and on PC and I do like the stuff the updates added I just prefer the xbox version.I just don't like the over complication and I have been told the lag and low screen rate I suffer from are due to my low spec machine but to be frank computers are a HELL OF A LOT MORE COMPLEX THAN A CONSOLE. Plus they are more expencive I could just buy an xbox for cheap rather than dish out a ton for a pc
So could we disscuss if the pc does deserve to be top dog, or should it just share the spot with the consoles
Same except I don't all all current gen consoles.Irridium said:Well I paid $350 for my pc about 3 years ago, and its been fine ever since...
Still, nothing is, or ever will be top dog. Each platform has its own strengths and weaknesses. Saying one is better then the other is just stupid.
I own a beefy PC and all current gen consoles. Trust me, one is not better then the other.