Are you saying that ALL furries are like that? It's very likely the minority, the extreme minority.ravensheart18 said:Because they are kind of like those into beastiaity, only without enough guts to follow through.
Are you saying that ALL furries are like that? It's very likely the minority, the extreme minority.ravensheart18 said:Because they are kind of like those into beastiaity, only without enough guts to follow through.
OH CHRIST NO! *tremors*.Daystar Clarion said:Remember when you were a kid and watched Loony Tunes?
Remember when Bugs Bunny would dress as a lady bunny and you would laugh?
"Oh, you silly Elmer Fudd, that's Bugs in disguise!", you would shout, a gleeful smile on your face.
Now imagine all the childhood innocence removed from that scene.
...
Yeah.
Please read the preceding comments and then rethink your opinion.jawakiller said:I remember when wanting animal love was something rednecks were accused of doing to get them mad.
Now it's... Cool?
I don't get it. What happened?
*Why y u no literate*Capt. Crankypants said:"Furry Fury"? OP, Y U No alliterate?
![]()
Anyway, I dunno whether I'm just not up to speed with the internet or whatever, but I don't go looking for 'Furries' on any forums, and I've never really seen any around here. There probably are some, but good on em for keeping it to themselves.
This pretty much describes my feelings on the subject.TestECull said:Because it's the 'in' thing to do. I don't hate on 'em. Not one of 'em, but I don't hate on 'em either.
Pretty much. I've actually met a few furries IRL and the only thing they do to express their views in a physical sense is wear dog collars. Yeah, it's a bit weird, but it's not anything weirder than the average hipster honestly.Cid SilverWing said:That text is only half-right. I'll get to that in a mo'.Blargh McBlargh said:This image [http://i44.tinypic.com/2cn8oxt.png] pretty much sums it all up. :/
And yes, it's safe to click. Just some text I couldn't be arsed to transcribe.
Furries get hated because of there being not a single piece of media outlet that depicts the actual facts, instead they overexpose the sexual minority within the furry fandom, which by the way is NOT in any way, shape or form, exclusive to us. Other fandoms have sexual lunatics in them too.
If you actually took time out to do your research, you'd be shocked at how furries are no different than people who aren't furries. There are even furries that hate other furries for being furverts (read: shamelessly overexposed sluts). As a furry myself, I have and always will be condemning zoophilia/bestiality and anyone who says/thinks that said fetish is a "true fetish for any self-respecting furry", because it isn't. It's a fucking crime against Nature and I'm ashamed to know that I used to know a few furries who turned out to be closet zoophiles.
No, stop. Don't quote me and say that zoophilia = animal sex. "Zoophilia" refers to human-on-quadruped-animal sex, or animal-on-animal sex. None of the animals in question are biped or sentient. If they are actually sentient with human intelligence, they qualify as humanoids and are thus exempt from the fetish.
But this is the Internet, after all, where the stupids of the world are free to pitchfork-and-torch-mob anything Fox News tells them to. So get off your narrow-minded ignorant asses and actually LOOK into things before you judge.
ravensheart18 said:Because they are kind of like those into beastiaity, only without enough guts to follow through.
*hangs head in frustrationarc101 said:Please read the preceding comments and then rethink your opinion.jawakiller said:Now it's... Cool?