Merteg said:
gbemery said:
Merteg said:
I'd say making them love us will be better than making them hate us.
If we kill them, that just makes new terrorists, and they hate us more.
If we try to give them support and talk with them, we may be able influence them.
"Well, if wishes were horses, then beggars would ride, but I generally don't put much stock into the idea that if we pretend very hard, fiction will become reality."
Care to elaborate? Are you saying that us using diplomacy with our enemies will never happen? Or that you don't think diplomacy will work?
Well you can talk about diplomacy all you want and how it would be better than war (and it would be) but sad to say we don't live in a world of happiness and love, where arguments are settled over a nice cup of tea and gum drops shower from the heavens. The fact is that most things that cause war have started in diplomatic channels and usually have been there for years, but you just never hear about them in the news because people rather hear about what other celebrity died today or why they missed Simon giving someone a standing ovation.
In places where war breaks out where diplomacy failed, it is usually because there's an underlying history of events that cause tension. Things you can't solve with diplomacy alone. If you think having a civil chat with a terrorist cell would be possible then by all means go for it but don't be surprised when they try to blow you up because they believe in the phrase 'actions speak louder than words' or 'kill the infidel'.
A few posted things along the lines of 'some people kill people because they just don't like each other' and that is true as well. Examples the events in Rwanda and places in the Middle East where one ethnic group hates another just because of what they believe and kill each other for it. Diplomacy wouldn't even work in some of those places because some of them would rather kill themselves then speak to the other. One can also argue how 'well' diplomacy is working with North Korea and Iran right now. You could also argue between whether or not it was diplomacy or economic collapse of the Soviet Union that ended the cold war. In the end though it wouldn't really matter what I said because you already made up your mind before you posted the thread. Your belief that diplomacy should always be used but isn't because there is more money in war, and that which you have stated is the 'only' thing for which our government does anything.