Well, for starters, Jar-Jar Binks served absolutely no purpose in any scene he was in.nin_ninja said:I know that many people find him annoying, but I don't understand all the hatred for Jar-Jar and the Phantom Menace. I think that Liam Neeson (as always) did a great job with the character he had, and while I do find Jar-Jar kinda annoying but I don't hate the character.
I know that everyone is going to have a different opinion, but maybe I'll agree with one of you.
i did the same thing. But i think hes just too "weird" to even be alive in the movies, like the jedi should have just killed him offAerodynamic said:Oh god, why did I start reading the title in his voice?
I don't hate him, but I am not much fond of him either.
Hey, leave a comment on my web box if you want a pizza roll.RedMenace said:Also: "Whats wrong with your faaaaaaace?"
10 months maybe...RedMenace said:Because he is a silly cartoon rabbit-thing who is in the movies only to appeal to children under the age of 10.
Also: "Whats wrong with your faaaaaaace?"
See, now I had this exact same problem with Hayden Christiansen XDDemon ID said:Because he was a horribly written character, and like you pointed out just annoying. His presence actually pissed me off, I found each time he came into the screen I would roll my eyes as line after line forced their way out of the cinema audio into my fragile ears. It was a rape of all the senses; luckily smellovision has yet to be created.
However I must admit part of the hate you see for Jar Jar stems from just a dislike of the new films. He now represents alot of what was wrong in the new trilogy, or at least that is what alot of people likely associate with the new films. Midi-chlorians for example, I much preferred the hippy magic answer than that shit.
Okay, I apologize and take my second sentence back. He is a severe case of ADHD nevertheless.StrangerMouse said:I'd care! A lot! He was a nice guy!Quaxar said:He knows where the Gungans hide!NeedAUserName said:Name one redeemable quality he has. I dare you.
He was a bit of an awfully stereotypical character with ADHD, still I didn't really hate him. I just think he could be killed off after a couple of minutes and no one would really care.
cxvbones said:Well, for starters, Jar-Jar Binks served absolutely no purpose in any scene he was in.nin_ninja said:I know that many people find him annoying, but I don't understand all the hatred for Jar-Jar and the Phantom Menace. I think that Liam Neeson (as always) did a great job with the character he had, and while I do find Jar-Jar kinda annoying but I don't hate the character.
I know that everyone is going to have a different opinion, but maybe I'll agree with one of you.
Ignoring his terrible dialogue and impossibly bad character, Jar-Jar is utterly pointless.
Watch the movie again. The one and only impact he has on the actual plot is to lead the way to the underwater city, something that could have been done by a bit player. There was no reason for Jar-Jar to become a member of the cast and he does absolutely nothing of any importance from then on.
If he were removed entirely from the movie, it would have changed literally nothing, no part of any proceedings and that is a very bad sign for a character.
Essentially, a clear indication that Lucas has no editors at all anymore, as no editor would permit a character with literally no impact on the plot to have THAT much screen time.
Hey, you know what makes any battle scene MUCH more tense and enjoyable?Mr.Pandah said:If anyone saw his antics on the battlefield they would've just given up.