Yes, because Fox News is reliable. If they caught two rednecks talking about how they'd like to bring back eugenics in-between dry heaves, they'd make a story out of it.
Wikipedia, home of pedophiles?
- Thread starter thethingthatlurks
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Earth has also been reported to be home to a million bajillion pedophiles, a shocking realization and even more shocking is when that statistic is compared to the amount of pedophiles living on other planets, which currently are equal to zero.
Please don't say that again, or else Fox might hear you. I can see the headline now, and it is not a pretty mental picture...ProfessorLayton said:
Hey, woah woah woah, getting a bit in over our heads here are we? Do you have any scientific proof to support your idea of paedophilia being inherently "wrong", or are you just spouting a bunch of subjective gibberish?Zekksta said:
For the record, a homosexual person who's actually incapable to relate to the hardships of a paedophile, despite all the discrimination, prejudice and hate that homosexuals have had to suffer through for years and years, and STILL wants to hit me for my very logical and well founded comparison is nothing short of a flaming hypocrite who I'd punch back ten times harder for hitting me.
Homosexuals, IF ANY should be the ones who get what im speaking of here, and if they don't then I find these individuals to be sad, pathetic and (worst of all) complete idiots...
This just in! Aliens from outer space have made contact with humanity for the first time in recorded history! And they just wanted to tell us that paedophilia is only occuring on earth, and that the rest of the universe thinks it is wrong and that we should instigate a genocidal campaign to rid the world of the sexual deviants once and for all.thethingthatlurks said:
And this is all true, and most of all FAIR and BALANCED!
Hell, if this goes much further I'll be the first to go for a face-bullet.CoverYourHead said:This calls for something beyond the realm of face-palm... Yes, gentlemen (and women) this calls for... A face-desk!
I mean seriously? Must've been a really slow news day or a reporter wanted was being fired and wanted to go out with a bang.
It sounds more to me like these pedophiles acknowledge their fetish as a psychological affliction, and are trying to provide the facts, so that they can help deal with their problem. Knowledge is power, so I guess that if people understand the what-not of why they have such perversions, they can better control themselves and participate in society.
The key problem here is the terminology; it seems these pedophiles use the term to refer to their attraction to children, while the general public uses "pedophilia" to refer to some sort of sexual act towards a child.
The key problem here is the terminology; it seems these pedophiles use the term to refer to their attraction to children, while the general public uses "pedophilia" to refer to some sort of sexual act towards a child.
Ah,Fox,the people who thought the INTERNAT HAET MACHEEN would spread pedo images everywhere.
Now its Wikipedia or.....Wikipedoia that will attract pedos.
Then it will be Google!
and etc.
Now its Wikipedia or.....Wikipedoia that will attract pedos.
Then it will be Google!
and etc.
And you don't find it good reason enough to atually... You know, REFLECT a little over your own opinions and what logical paths they lead you down to?Zekksta said:
Im not trying to claim that paedophilia is "natural", what im telling you (and everyone else for that matter) is that "natural" is just a subjective concept, with no scientific basis what so ever. Everything is "natural" when it all comes down to it. In fact, it would be rather peculiar if annything "unnatural" could ever occur anywhere.
What we CAN discuss however is how "functional" something is ACCORDING TO our established, but nontheless subjective standards, laws and what mankind as a collective wish to uphold.
So claiming that anything could be "unnatural" like you're trying to do, and also try to use it as some kind of justification for your anti-intellectual opinions, just doesn't work. As what I've said what happens when you allow yourself to get too emotional in a debate, which probably got you on probation in the first place.
A little less sensitivity, and I assure you that you'll most likely not find your self on probation as much, and you'll probably not too many logical mistakes as you do now either.
Quite frankly, you're doing the same mistakes that FOX news does all day long (this is just a statement, not meant as an insult. Really, it isn't meant that way)