In short, no!
In long, noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
In long, noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
As a PS3 owner, I agree. I can't imagine 360 owners getting a ps3 just to play another shooter even if it was as good as the top 360 shooters, and as I haven't tried it yet, I'm not even convinced it will be.floppylobster said:I would be more likely to buy a PS3 for Flower, or Noby Noby Boy.
Much more likely for a Team Ico game.
Games are not worth the ConsoleThat Dude With A Face said:It looks good, but no. No single game is worth the price of a console.
MaxTheReaper said:I just thought of something: Why are you only asking Xbox owners?
Is this supposed to be a "hurr hurr now my console is better" thread, or is it just because of the similarities between the two?
EDIT:Is that a stupid consumer? Because that's just a waste of money.ZippyDSMlee said:No no it just means you are a consumer like any other.C Lion said:KDR_11k said:So to be a real gamer, I have to invest like 800 dollars and buy a Wii and PS3? In that case no thanks, I'd rather be a fake, soft-core gamer.ZippyDSMlee said:If you are casual(either hard or soft) you don;t need more than 1 but as a real gamer there are maybe at best 4 or so games on each system worth owning, thus in order to have all the worth while games you have to buy all the systems.
If you don't care or don't have the money your stuck with marginalized quality. It was not as bad last gen when the industry made games geared to enthusiasts(what was once called the hard core gamer), now adays its all casual focused either to the lite/non gamer of the brain dead hardcore game consumer....
That reeks of No True Scotsman.![]()
And anyway, who says there are four good games per console? I haven't seen anything on the PS3 or Xbox 360 I want, except maybe Crackdown. So am I not a hardcore gamer?
'Cause I still spent all night playing...
Ya so? I might have over stated bit I suck at words but if you are happy with the current industry then you are a casual gamer or a hard core gamer that has money to blow on ever other game released....KDR_11k said:No your a casual gamer, that's not a bad thing persay but it means your expectations and taste for quality is lower.
Lost oddessy, Blue dragon, Halo ep 3, I could probably name 3 or 4 more games I would be willing to spend 20$ish on but as far as great games I dunno Lost oddessy is one there are at least 2 more I would pay full price for but for the msot part this gen has shtty over priced games on all systems.
I mean I can name abotu as many for the PS3 most of which I would be hard pressed to give more than 20 a pop for, now teh WII has Mario,Zelda and Metroid that I would be willing to shell out 50$ a pop for even if they mixed quality.
Being a game nazi/enthusiast drives the demand for high quality sometimes to the point of unreasonableness.
The trouble is this gen amkes it ahrd on real gamers because the industry shifted from quality to mass market development which pushes down quality on all titles making most of them far more causal/simplified/rushed/unpolished/buggy.
I eqaute the game industry to the music industry it churns out safe bland generic stuff so the publishers can stay in money while they chrun out stuff constantly and since the largest publishers are partnering up we are going to see even more mixed quality and shovelware as they figure out the old attage quality sales...not just the appearance of quality.
Non Sequitur. I called your comment about how real gamers must own all systems because they don't find more than 4 games on each a No True Scotsman argument because you define your category by how closely a person obeys your claim. The common definition of a gamer is one who plays games. A real gamer is one who really plays games. You can't tell me everybody who plays games only sees 4 good games on each console, if that were the case we wouldn't see tie-in ratios of 6-8.ZippyDSMlee said:So quality has never been better and prices nothing for the quality you get on a game to game basis...... ballocks.... quality is down,shine and cost is up and the consumer never more woolly.