Wizards Blow Stuff Up in Amazing Harry Potter 7 (Part 2) Trailer

Recommended Videos

Nikolaz72

This place still alive?
Apr 23, 2009
2,125
0
0
feather240 said:
Nautical Honors Society said:
I don't think there has ever been a film series to produce as many quality films as Harry Potter. 7 films each with good to great critical acclaim and each entertaining in their own right.

Well done HP, well done.
You haven't seen the fifth movie have you?
There was never a fifth movie, they skipped that. Dont you remember?

OT: Fifth was decent. So was Sixth.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
Ever since the third movie, Harry Potter has felt like an assembly line production. Especially The Deathly Hallows part 1. God, what a boring, boring movie that was. And the trailer for part 2 just seems to scream "Gawd, look at how epic this is, seriously". But as long as David Yates is still directing it, it's going to be as bland as a cup of lukewarm coffee.
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
Man, I know the last five have sucked but this one's the winner! [/sarcasm]

I literally only watch these out of a sense of obligation to finish this crappy series now. The last one had me laughing, literally out loud, in the theatre at how terrible it was. I hate Emma Watson beyond reason, I'm more interested in the backdrops than Daniel Radcliffe whenever he's on screen, and the one thing out of the whole confused mess I even partly enjoy is Rupert Grint, who's been turned into a mugging goon for at least the last two movies.

I will bet heavily that this film is not worth it.
 

DoctorPhil

New member
Apr 25, 2011
262
0
0
I need to warn you: the ending is the lamest thing ever. Take it from someone who read the book and then regretted it. I hope they at least change the ending a bit so we actually get a final battle with Voldemort.
 

CardinalPiggles

New member
Jun 24, 2010
3,226
0
0
Calico93 said:
Hang on, when the fuck ever did Harry jump off a cliff with Voldemort ?!!?
thats what i was thinking,

i guess its in place of the circle of death harry must face right near the end

but thats kind of annoying, nothing should be changed too much in this film, the book was amazing.
 

team star pug

Senior Member
Sep 29, 2009
684
0
21
War Penguin said:
NeutralDrow said:
War Penguin said:
Eight movies. Eight movies, and I still cannot figure out why the f*** Voldemort doesn't have a nose! :p
Because he has snake nostrils.
Yes, those are nostrils, but I'm asking for a nose. Did they ever explain why he has nostrils but no nose?

[sub]I'm not denying they did, but I don't remember if or where they said that.[/sub]
They said he split his soul so much that it altered his appearence.
 

LightspeedJack

New member
May 2, 2010
1,478
0
0
Aww I was hoping Emma Watson would be naked again, oh well I'm still pretty pumped for this movie. For all of the kiddy rubbish in the early movies this series looks like it's actually going to pay off at the end.
 

teebeeohh

New member
Jun 17, 2009
2,896
0
0
as long as they put the fucking epilogue after the credits so i can leave without having to watch that shit i am happy
 

tahrey

New member
Sep 18, 2009
1,124
0
0
Interesting. They seem to have done a good job of turning what appeared to be an utterly trashy and very poorly written book - when I flicked through it and decided "mmm... nah... I think not" (back around the time of the 4chan spoiler campaign, and I figured I'd find out if they were true) anyway - into a fairly compelling looking film.

Or at least, a compelling-looking trailer. I've been online long enough to know that with the right music and suitable editing, you can do that to almost ANYTHING. But still, if someone asks me to go see it, I may say yes this time, even not having seen any of the others except no.1 way back in like 2001... (tell ya what, 10 years is a long time to be at the same highschool...)

They HAVE to keep the twee epilogue though. Too many films go buildup-buildup-buildup-CLIMAX!-credits and it's a disappointing jolt. Let us have our three minutes of gentle denoument after it, even if it is sugary and trite.

Oh, and Cerberus effect a-go-go. It's pretty much the poster child for it. First one? Happy go lucky kids book with lots of bright colours on it, hardly anything major happens within. Last one? (and this is not going to spoiler it for anyone who actually cares...) ... EVERYBODY DIES. Well, everyone except for Harry, his squeeze, Hermaphrodite and The Ginger. Who are all anyone cares about.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Great trailer, still haven't seen the 7 though; the 6th film was so mind-numbingly boring in places that I couldn't face it. The director and editor don't seem willing to cut anything out, and as far as I'm aware, its the same people.

Also, thanks for the TV Tropes link - gonna be on it for fucking hours now.
 

BabyRaptor

New member
Dec 17, 2010
1,505
0
0
PoisonUnagi said:
Question: WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT THING AT 1:09
That would be the Protego Horibillis spell going down off the castle.

You know what I can't stop wondering about? That scene with the huge group of people casting green sparks into the air. What is THAT?
 

Exterminas

New member
Sep 22, 2009
1,130
0
0
Am I the only one thinking that the actor playing Voldemort does an insanely good job?

Every scene with that man is just awesome. He could play the dark Lord sitting on the toilet, reading "Badass Monthly" and it would still make me shiver.
 

Nazulu

They will not take our Fluids
Jun 5, 2008
6,242
0
0
Proverbial Jon said:
Nazulu said:
I'm still trying to figure out why so many people had a problem with the 5th movie, what problems did you have with it?
It was boring as hell. That was MY main problem with it. But saying that, it was a good film, a very good film. The problem was more the book, it was just a kind of filler book that didn't really advance the plot all that much. What they did with the film was the best they could, but ultimately they were on a hiding to nothing. That said, there is nothing in this world more amazing than Immelda Staunton as Umbridge, that's some brilliant casting right there. (Lol casting, geddit?)

Personally, I thought the third film was the absolute pits, I don't know why everyone seems to praise that one.
Casting lol

I still don't get it though, I found that movie very interesting, didn't mind how dark it was but Staunton was a scary ***** and I loved the wizard battles. Actually, it's my favourite one but that's possibly because I can remember most of it.

I need to watch 'em all again, planning on buying a box set when movie 7b comes to DVD.
 

SpaceMedarotterX

New member
Jun 24, 2010
456
0
0
Captain Placeholder said:
SpaceMedarotterX said:
ah Harry Potter, the Naruto of the literature world, and I mean that with as much disrespect as I can muster. Or is it the 'Gundam Seed Destiny' cause at the beginning it kinda looked good and then OH MY ME did it turn to shit
No, you are absolutely wrong. Twilight is the Naruto of the Literature world - both are equally crap, worthless story and consistantly badgers you with the point of the story (Twilight - Fuck dogs/Dead People = Naruto - get your ass kicked and be constantly annoying).

Harry Potter was well written children's tale that grew up as the readers grew up. When I originally read Harry Potter I was around 8-12 (My memory of those years is incredibly bad) and I grew up with Mr. Potter and all his adventures. This is excellent to see what is going to happen :D
Oh my no Twilight is the GARZEYS WING of the Literature World. Harry Potter was at least good before JK Rowling realized she couldn't write action, couldn't write dialogue, couldn't pace, and pulled out as many cheap 'shock' twists she could in that last pile of quivering putrid slop that is Deathly Hallows. I have read these books, I read them as a kid growing up, and I did not slowly turn on them because it was the 'mature' thing to do. Someone who claims his favourite SF Book series to be a tie between Artemis Fowl and Ciaphas Cain, and has a shelf full of mecha doesn't hate something for being mature.

Oh their was the potential for great books in there, and I would be lying if I said it was the fault of the mythos. It's the fault of the writer. Now saying that she's still leagues above Meyer and Kishimoto, but she's certainly no Colfer or Oda.

I have never in my life encountered a story about a wizards war that was so boring however. I have never once before hand come to the end of a story expecting a climax and getting a horrible pay off.

I saw Ciaphas Cain nuke the Necrons, I marveled when Artemis Fowl shot a neutrino blast through time to save someones life in the past, I cheered when Lief took his crown as the King of Deltora and cast out the Shadowlord, and I felt sick as I watched The Eclipse in Berserk.

I felt disappointment when I put down Dealthly Hallows. Not from the epilogue, not from the cartoonish villain, not from the characters who betrayed their own morals, but because it had all just been so boring.

When Portgas D. Ace died in One Piece, the first real death of the series long 500 chapters into it's run Everyone who read it went into shock, denied it being real, until it became incredibly apparent that this wasn't going to have a miraculous recovery and he had died, smiling, despite Luffys near 50 chapter battle to save his life he failed his brother and went into shock.

This wasn't some death that was done to shock the reader however, it was done to further the entire main cast, despite only Luffy being their to witness it. What did 90% of the deaths in Harry Potter achieve except to shock and wow you?

And as my ultimate dig, the one I know will outrage you, and the one with the most hyperbole. When I can look at something from Pokemon and say "This character had more character development than anyone from Harry Potter" in this case Red and Ruby from the Adventures Manga, then you know you've done a terrible job of making a character grow up.

Imma save my money for Green Lantern thank you very much.