Xanadu84 said:
geldonyetich said:
Xanadu84 said:
Well, no arguing with rampant, blinding sexism I guess. Shes a person. Hot or no, she has the same rights as other people.
Oh, damn, you sure showed me. I'm such a sexist!
Since, after all, you know me well enough to brand me such off of two sentences you can't read right.
I hope it turns out her boss was a woman, you might learn something.
Also, criticizing someone for having a faulty argument is not ad hominen. Calling someone ridiculously oblivious, however...
...is called for when it's true.
I'm noticing that you don't actually have any points left, and have been reduced to sarcasm and personal attacks. Well, I think were done here.
Yeah, this from a guy who took an entire post of mine, where I address his points individually, quoted the whole thing (or rather tried, but botched the quote tag), and simply replied,
"Well, no arguing with rampant, blinding sexism I guess." [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.199372.6525328]
Before, I called you simply ridiculously oblivious. Between this post and the one I just linked, you provided some pretty solid proof that you're not this at all. Yes, thanks to the way you reacted, you've graduated to bonafide raving hypocrite.
I support the employee of the month in reasonable dress asking for the same treatment as her co-workers. You support the sex-obsessed pervert who gets all uncomfortable in his no no place when something over a size A is wearing less then a Burka.
In your little fantasy world, perhaps.
In reality, what you support is a woman you've never met in some kind of kneejerk reverse-sexism that automatically demonizes the boss. If you even read the article more carefully, you'd know that this claim is completely her own, her boss claims that she was fired due to bad performance issues. It's entirely possible she's playing you like a fiddle.
Though I could have put it a bit ore benignly, what I was saying is if a person creates a disruptive presence in the office, and she's unable to solve that she's the cause of that disruption, she's more liable to get sacked than those she disrupts. It doesn't matter if you're man or woman, that's how the work place generally functions. If you can't hear that without your head exploding into a bunch of cheap, easy feminist-supporting answers, you need to go take a good look in the mirror and confront what a knee-jerking twit you are.
And now, were not going to do anything except flame, so I don't see the point.
That was my line, 2 posts ago.
Me said:
Go back and read my original post on this thread, I clarified far beyond the shadow of these ridiculous knee-jerks, and I would appreciate it if you take the effort to read. Until you demonstrate at least that effort, you've demonstrated only unworthiness to trade words with on this issue.
You replied to me simply to criticize me. It reflected back on you negatively. Learn from it now, and maybe your self-inflicted misery will be short. Do us all a favor: if you're not willing to take a little effort to defend your view, don't bother hitting that reply button, because there's always a chance you're going to run into somebody who calls you on it.
