Jennacide said:
mad825 said:
the headline is very misleading.
there is a chance she died watching from the porn but it could have been coincidence that she died from sudden death syndrome at that moment in time.
So you're trying to say it's MORE likely she died from a condition that happens in one in several million people once over the age of three, than it is that she got so excited her blood flow reduced to the point out heart failure?
Yeah, no. This is not the first over excited heart failure, far from the last.
Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:
mad825 said:
the headline is very misleading.
there is a chance she died watching from the porn but it could have been coincidence that she died from sudden death syndrome at that moment in time.
She died of SUDS? Isn't she supposed to have a terrible nightmare beforehand, and be south-east Asian? Unless you're thinking of a different SUDS.
vivaldiscool said:
mad825 said:
the headline is very misleading.
there is a chance she died watching from the porn but it could have been coincidence that she died from sudden death syndrome at that moment in time.
Sudden death syndrome typically happens while asleep.
*sigh*
I'm saying no-one can support hard evidence that her death was cause by the porn thus the Daily mail should have not have claimed that she died from the porn hence the
"headline is very misleading" because people
stupid as you assume things when the claim is not entirely correct/accurate.
for those who cannot be fucked from reading the article, I am suggesting nothing new, this is nehtier a medical debate, I am pointing out the fact that the Daily mail are taking words out of context for the media whore they are.
