Which is precisely why neither I nor you are qualified to be running a country. That doesn't mean, however, that I can't express my opinion on the matter.Devoneaux said:That's not getting rid of the problem, that's moving it somewhere else.RJ 17 said:Well since China already has Big Government to take care of everything, have a state-sponsored foster program to offer adoptions to people in other countries while maintaining various incentives - other than forced abortions - for families to have no more than 1 child. Any child that doesn't get adopted gets sent abroad at a certain age (say, 18) to live and work for x years before they can come back. Not so much deporting your own people as it is sending them on a Quarian-style pilgramage.Devoneaux said:So then what exactly would you do instead?RJ 17 said:Yeah, it might. But guess what? It wasn't. As such I'm well within my rights to say that I don't agree with their system, but I understand the justification for it.Devoneaux said:One would think your viewpoint may be different if your culture was shaped around multiple widespread famines that resulted in child slaves and children being openly used as a source of food.RJ 17 said:Yeah, just wanted to point out that this is nothing new. China doesn't "want" to implement a 1 child policy, it already HAS implemented a 1 child policy. It's been going on for a pretty long time now. Barbaric as it is, they justify it by saying they're a nation of x billion people, population control is a necessity for the preservation of resources. I don't like such a policy, but that's their justification for it.