Woman lops off man?s nose for harassing her
- Thread starter facaldo
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I've heard many similar stories, all based around the Middle East, and some odd things in Japan too. Thier way of life is completely irrational, whether it's tradition, religon, or just some stupid ideal that's prompting this behaviour doesn't matter: something needs to change.
I feel horrible for smirking at that. He lost his freaking nose! How do you recover from that without copying off Michael Jackson?TehIrishSoap said:
OT: Justified? Like hell. All of them mentioned in the news should be arrested for many various reasons I just don't have the time to put up.
Okay, for those who may have missed the similarity between this incident and a certain cover of a popular "news" magazine recently, I'm going to point it out. This is just a bit of a reversal here, in fact, it's an interesting reversal in a lot of ways, and I find a couple of things interesting here.
The first thing I find interesting is that even though the man never actually harmed her, and she caused permanent damage to him, he's still the bad guy. If the situation was reversed, would people be saying it was justified? Or would the mere SUGGESTION that it was justified be called sexist?
Second, all we hear is from her. We never hear from the guy, we're not getting the whole story. For all we know, she started it. We don't know, and the information is not given. She responded incorrectly to the situation out of all proportion. This fact alone suggests that she's not altogether stable.
Here's the problem I'm having with the modern sex dynamics (I avoid the term 'gender' as I've had people argue with me over what that means). In the narrative of sex politics, men are always the villains, women are always the pure angels incapable of doing any wrong. This has been repeated ad nauseum for at least twenty years, and I'm calling it now. The problem with the modern view of the sexes is that it states that women are better than men, but men dominate women. This is nonsensical, and stupid. If women were in every way superior to men as we are led to believe (or at least equal in every way) how did men dominate them? I mean, the greater physical strength of men? This can't exist (according to the modern view of the sexes) because women are equal in every respect to men. For men to dominate women to the degree that they supposedly do, they would have to have some inherent advantage. The entire theory upon which the feminist theory of history is flawed, and I challenge anyone to prove otherwise.
The first thing I find interesting is that even though the man never actually harmed her, and she caused permanent damage to him, he's still the bad guy. If the situation was reversed, would people be saying it was justified? Or would the mere SUGGESTION that it was justified be called sexist?
Second, all we hear is from her. We never hear from the guy, we're not getting the whole story. For all we know, she started it. We don't know, and the information is not given. She responded incorrectly to the situation out of all proportion. This fact alone suggests that she's not altogether stable.
Here's the problem I'm having with the modern sex dynamics (I avoid the term 'gender' as I've had people argue with me over what that means). In the narrative of sex politics, men are always the villains, women are always the pure angels incapable of doing any wrong. This has been repeated ad nauseum for at least twenty years, and I'm calling it now. The problem with the modern view of the sexes is that it states that women are better than men, but men dominate women. This is nonsensical, and stupid. If women were in every way superior to men as we are led to believe (or at least equal in every way) how did men dominate them? I mean, the greater physical strength of men? This can't exist (according to the modern view of the sexes) because women are equal in every respect to men. For men to dominate women to the degree that they supposedly do, they would have to have some inherent advantage. The entire theory upon which the feminist theory of history is flawed, and I challenge anyone to prove otherwise.
i have to say no. Unless he was about to attack her when she chopped off his nose. Since she was in danger. But in general no, she should've had something else done. But this is still pretty funny to me.
There is no such thing as European, Asian, American and African culture. There are thousands of cultures within those four vast continents, some of which are good and some of which are bad (in my opinion, of course), but they are separate cultures.Demented Teddy said: