Women gaming problems, solution discussion 1

Recommended Videos

Phasmal

Sailor Jupiter Woman
Jun 10, 2011
3,676
0
0
shadowuser10141 said:
Phasmal said:
The problem is I won't just say `you're right`?
No the problem is you threatened to leave the conversation because I don't know what it's like to be a girl gamer and "we will agree to disagree" blah blah.
I didn't say anything about that. I do think perhaps your opinions and mine are not compatible on this, shit happens. It seems to bother you more than me. I'm not `threatening to leave the conversation`, I'll go when I like.
shadowuser10141 said:
I play on a Hale TF2 server where we have a female admin and female gamers and nobody says anything.
Okay. Once again, I don't have a problem with that, I'm kinda trying to discuss the wider issues not just my personal experience, which, I repeat, is fine
shadowuser10141 said:
You don't have to pretend not to be a girl. Most people don't care.
Yeah, most people don't. But you can't really tell when someone will. Either way, it's just a small annoyance.
Besides, did you miss my linked study earlier that showed the amount of negative comments a female voice gets VS a male voice and no voice? Or did you just ignore it.
Clearly that shows that people kinda do care.
 

carnex

Senior Member
Jan 9, 2008
828
0
21
Phasmal said:
Okay. Once again, I don't have a problem with that, I'm kinda trying to discuss the wider issues not just my personal experience, which, I repeat, is fine
I didn't understand that. I tought you were harrased yourself. Oh well, I'm still looking for a female gamer that actually have problems on anything like regular basis.
 

Phasmal

Sailor Jupiter Woman
Jun 10, 2011
3,676
0
0
carnex said:
Phasmal said:
Okay. Once again, I don't have a problem with that, I'm kinda trying to discuss the wider issues not just my personal experience, which, I repeat, is fine
I didn't understand that. I tought you were harrased yourself. Oh well, I'm still looking for a female gamer that actually have problems on anything like regular basis.
Obviously I have been harassed in the past, but I know how to avoid it.
I think if I was just going around randomly using voice on different games I'd still get it. But most female gamers choose to hide their gender.
Which brings me back to my point of visibility VS easy gaming life.
I think I'm going insane!
 

carnex

Senior Member
Jan 9, 2008
828
0
21
So it's either, as a group (female gamers), saving yourself some pain but having to hide forever or taking the pain on as a badge of honour untill things do improve.

Not a pretty choice, but if you can take it, i think everyone knows what's the right one.
 

Yuuki

New member
Mar 19, 2013
995
0
0
runic knight said:
Good references there. You can really see the parallels in how the games are marketed now compared to before and how the comic industry of the 90's did it before the crash. Furthermore the greedy behaviors and push of collectors items that were worthless, as well as the rapid decline of new readers is what really drove the bubble burst of the 90's, as the items people were going after in the name of collector's items hoping for the next "1st appearance of superman" lead to a deluge of comic creators cashing in with countless events and first appearances and new heros, most of which were rip offs and the same broody, violent "adult" hero, chasing the ideas of Watchmen and the new version of Batman that started the trend. They copied the traits of dark and edgy in hopes that was what attracted new readers, ignoring the good story telling and likeable but still flawed characters.
I can't see any parallels between what you just described and what gaming is doing. Children are getting drawn into gaming at younger and younger ages (even a blind man could see this), they will grow up to pursue gaming throughout their lives more than ever before.

runic knight said:
In games, I can only look at the trend of chasing WoW and CoD, overpriced Collector's editions and excessive, broody, violent "adult" games as a lesson not learned from history.
You can only look at those trends, not surprising. Making endless clones of WoW/CoD is definitely on the decline because devs realized that people might as well simply play WoW/CoD for the best WoW/CoD experience. New innovation is being paved in the way of online/multiplayer games more than ever before, an entire new console generation awaits.
If you can't broaden your vision beyond excessive/violent "adult" games then you obviously won't see (or even bother about) anything other than that. It's called tunnel vision.

runic knight said:
There are also strong parallels when it comes to terrible characterizations in general and female participation and portrayals too. The idea of skimpy women in attempts to seem more adult and mature as well as sexualization appeal while gutting characters into soulless and often unlikeably done archtypes
Skimpy women = mature? Are you living in the 90's or something? Skimpy women = pandering to a male audience, this has been known for a LONG time now. I stopped categorizing "pandering to X audience" as a negative thing a while ago, since all audiences have a right to be "pandered to" and it will continue to thrive as long as there is market demand. Criticize away.

runic knight said:
Tying back into women here, it is actually any non-18-35 male demographic that is not being targeted as much
Maybe because they're not buying the games as much. Just a guess.
 

Specter Von Baren

Annoying Green Gadfly
Legacy
Aug 25, 2013
5,637
2,859
118
I don't know, send help!
Country
USA
Gender
Cuttlefish
By the way Runic Knight. I assume that, based on the title, this is just the first in a series of threads discussing this issue. So my question is, at what point will you feel we should move on to the next area of discussion and what will that area be about specifically?
 

shadowuser10141

New member
Jun 15, 2013
71
0
0
Phasmal said:
I didn't say anything about that. I do think perhaps your opinions and mine are not compatible on this, shit happens. It seems to bother you more than me. I'm not `threatening to leave the conversation`, I'll go when I like.
It doesn't bother me at all. I don't take multiplayer seriously and neither should you.
Saying our opinions are incompatible is very similar to we will agree to disagree.

Okay. Once again, I don't have a problem with that, I'm kinda trying to discuss the wider issues not just my personal experience, which, I repeat, is fine
That's an Xbox live study and I don't play Xbox.
The reason I talked about 13-year-olds is because a lot of them play CoD or Halo on Xbox and run their mouth to everyone.

Yeah, most people don't. But you can't really tell when someone will. Either way, it's just a small annoyance.
Besides, did you miss my linked study earlier that showed the amount of negative comments a female voice gets VS a male voice and no voice? Or did you just ignore it.
Clearly that shows that people kinda do care.
There is nothing we can do about trolls. Just mute them or go on another server.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
Yuuki said:
runic knight said:
Good references there. You can really see the parallels in how the games are marketed now compared to before and how the comic industry of the 90's did it before the crash. Furthermore the greedy behaviors and push of collectors items that were worthless, as well as the rapid decline of new readers is what really drove the bubble burst of the 90's, as the items people were going after in the name of collector's items hoping for the next "1st appearance of superman" lead to a deluge of comic creators cashing in with countless events and first appearances and new heros, most of which were rip offs and the same broody, violent "adult" hero, chasing the ideas of Watchmen and the new version of Batman that started the trend. They copied the traits of dark and edgy in hopes that was what attracted new readers, ignoring the good story telling and likeable but still flawed characters.
I can't see any parallels between what you just described and what gaming is doing. Children are getting drawn into gaming at younger and younger ages (even a blind man could see this), they will grow up to pursue gaming throughout their lives more than ever before.
The market strategies (darker, more violent, more attempts at being "mature" in order to try to fit demand from ->
The core targeted demographic
The habit of chasing what is the current biggest thing
The habit of choosing short term profit in spite of the concerns of the consumers.

I did go into why there isn't a bubble going to burst bit later on, in mentioning Nintendo as just one example. The main point was not that there was going to be some great crash because of lack of new players, rather, that the tactics themselves are crappy and have been seen before.
Hell, one could touch on the prominence of the internet alone to give free (if often uninspired) gaming to anyone looking as a reason why the gaming market itself wont ever burst. Though, the Triple A market on the other hand has shown a lot of signs of being forced to consolidate, closing down and combining at noteworthy rate, and that market is the one I was referring to as showing those parallels to comic industry of the 90's.


runic knight said:
In games, I can only look at the trend of chasing WoW and CoD, overpriced Collector's editions and excessive, broody, violent "adult" games as a lesson not learned from history.
You can only look at those trends, not surprising. Making endless clones of WoW/CoD is definitely on the decline because devs realized that people might as well simply play WoW/CoD for the best WoW/CoD experience. New innovation is being paved in the way of online/multiplayer games more than ever before, an entire new console generation awaits.
If you can't broaden your vision beyond excessive/violent "adult" games then you obviously won't see (or even bother about) anything other than that. It's called tunnel vision.
I gave an example of a trend that is parallel to the same trend that happened in comics. I never said there was no innovation (though I could make arguments about the value of the innovation we have been seeing with the new consoles, from the attempts microsoft has had to go back on to general failings of peripheral devices throughout gaming history). Say what you want about tunnel vision, you can at least see the point I was making about there being a trend, yes? And when you have some of the largest companies in the industry all driving for the same demographic and trying to repeat the same successes you have the parallel to the comic industry that I was trying to make there.

runic knight said:
There are also strong parallels when it comes to terrible characterizations in general and female participation and portrayals too. The idea of skimpy women in attempts to seem more adult and mature as well as sexualization appeal while gutting characters into soulless and often unlikeably done archtypes
Skimpy women = mature? Are you living in the 90's or something? Skimpy women = pandering to a male audience, this has been known for a LONG time now. I stopped categorizing "pandering to X audience" as a negative thing a while ago, since all audiences have a right to be "pandered to" and it will continue to thrive as long as there is market demand. Criticize away.
I meant that sarcastically, as a common complaint raised about comics in the 90's was that they often showed much more skin while trying to introduce more "mature" storylines or just generally more violent ones. That was my whole commentary there. Yes, it is of course pandering, but to who, again? Certainly not children. Would it be fair to call it pandering to a more physically mature audience? Would it be wrong to call such pandering an attempt to appear to align with a more mature audience, or to put it shortly, an attempt to appear mature?
Would the clumsy way things like sex and violence were handled in the 90's era comics at large not be called a poor attempt to appear mature in order to pander to an audience that wanted more Watchmen like comics?

runic knight said:
Tying back into women here, it is actually any non-18-35 male demographic that is not being targeted as much
Maybe because they're not buying the games as much. Just a guess.
Yeah, what a brilliant insight that was explained 5 pages ago. Would you care to try touching on why that is happening, or will you just lazily claim it is a simple market demand, as though that is the sole reason the market is shaped like it is now? You know, sort of the point of that huge ass post I started with and tried to keep the discussion on, that of understanding why shit is the way it is to better grasp if we should try to change it and if so, how we could go about it?
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
Specter Von Baren said:
By the way Runic Knight. I assume that, based on the title, this is just the first in a series of threads discussing this issue. So my question is, at what point will you feel we should move on to the next area of discussion and what will that area be about specifically?
Well, initially I thought about throwing the entire thing out at once, but after the first chunk on participation, I got tired and knew I had written more then most would bother to read anyways.

As for the next step, I don't know. Portrayal seems likely to be it, since it is being mentioned a lot to help increase participation, though I see far more pointless bickering going on just by daring to say "more women in games would be a good thing", since that brings jackasses of both sides running. Seriously "toughen up" and complaints about males in culture as a whole... what the hell?

Anyways, I would say as soon as any good idea comes out would be a good place to start, as it gets the ball rolling at least. I still stand behind the idea of a good and inexpensive games resource for newbies and a group through steam that is moderated. Small, but hell, might be a start, though I admit I am not the one to start it nor keep it running.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
broca said:
Sorry, but that's just massive oversimplification plus huge overgeneralization plus some plain insulting stuff. I don't see a reason to argue with you, as that (based on you post) would lead nowhere, just wanted to voice my strong disagreement.
If you have nothing but strong disagreement, it's best not to bother posting.

If you think it's insulting, mark me and move on. If not, then provide a cogent argument. If you can't, you shouldn't bother telling people how wrong they are.

For the record, if you're talking about a general group you tend to generalise. Nobody is saying each and every member of the male/geek/gaming community is like this. It generalises because it's talking general trends and responses.

Accusing me of generalising is essentially admitting you missed the point.

Speaking of missing things....

runic knight said:
Ok, I took the time to write up that huge intro post and to try to answer most people I can in the thread. Please, please avoid blatant stereotypical bullshit just because you have had issues.
Actually, I don't have issues. Well, I do have issues, but not here. I have a lovely bass voice that doesn't get me negative attention online. My username, Zachary Amaranth (sometimes without the space) doesn't draw negative attention, either. I mean, yes, I get the standard juvenile shits, but dude...

...You just stereotyped me after complaining about stereotyping. You made baseless assumptions while accusing me of the same. Aaaaand....

But when you reduce what was suppose to be a deeper look and understanding into the whole situation to essentially one side being wrong, then you reveal a bias that has no place in the discussion at all.
I'm sorry, I don't buy into false equivalence. It's not a bias, it's an observation. I don't buy into there being equal validity to intelligent design or the theory that global warming is a hoax, either. I see no reason for false contrition to false claims.

If you can look at the arguments presented against women in gaming and tell me that both sides have equally valid points, then you, my friend, are the biased one.

And you do what the hell I said not to in the first post in attacking and blaming a group
It's neither attacking nor "blaming." Please. I spoke of actual examples from this very board which demonstrate an overall trend. The problem with people digging in their heels is intrinsic to the problem of a juvenile mentality: the gaming group as a whole needs to be treated with kid gloves not because people are wholly offensive but because gamers are so readily offended. A fast-forward button is grounds for death and rape threats. Mild tweaks to a gun's reload time is grounds for death threats. Reading off tropes in a dry, droning fashion is grounds for death and rape threats.

These are not offensive, yet the gaming community goes on the offense. These aren't even necessarily gendered issues.

Critical Miss talks about how to have an adult conversation, instant controversy.

No, I don't care your damn reasons in doing so, you don't get to reduce this to such simple bullshit as "one side is entitled whiny boysclub blablahblah". That shit does nothing to solve anything and actively derails the conversation and defeats the whole damn point of the thread.
Pretending that there's equivalence accomplishes nothing. Trying to gently handle a community that will bite even the gentle hand accomplishes nothing. Accusing it of being simple bullshit, incidentally, also solves nothing. The issues I've mentioned are the ones that need to be addressed and resolved.

And you know what? I'm going to get this out of the way right now:

The only one who has really dug their heels in and "fought" me is you. The worst I've gotten otherwise is a generic "you're wrong. You're so wrong I can't even tell you how wrong you are" post. And I preferred that one, because it still had a nicer tone.

The only one so far to make this a "fight" is you, so if you believe this is contrary to the thread's purpose, then don't do it.

Even Phasmal hasn't replied to me at this point, and she was the one the post was aimed at.

And honestly, maybe that's for the best. It's what you should have done if you sincerely believe ANY of what you're selling. And I'll be nice enough to assume good faith here.

I made this because I care about gaming itself and believe that the community has it within them to start fixing this, not because I wanted to listen to people air their grievances and blame the other side for shit.
See, there's that "us vs them" mentality again. If it's not an issue, why do you keep bringing it up?

I'm going to be quite frank here for a moment. I'm in a pretty damn good position to spot male privilege here, being that I'm granted it constantly. It's hard to step back from yourself an analyse it, I get that. But any pretense that it does not exist is a blatant frickin' lie. Girls in this thread have already been given the advice not to "provoke a reaction" by doing things like using a microphone or in any way identifying themselves as female. Please, explain to me the equivalence. Hell, when I drop the "Zachary" from my name, an artifact of days gone by, people instantly treat me differently, though there is no distinct feminine nature to "Amaranth." I've even found it listed as a boys' name online. Interesting. But that's not the point.

I have seen nothing so far that explains any natural equivalence here. I have seen attempts, but they appear to be pretense. The "well, both sides have some good points, so let's teach creationism alongside evolution in science class" sort of deal.

Please, since you are looking to be "fair and balanced," explain to me the other side.

And while you are not the first to try to do so, my patience in trying to explain that is running out so you get hit first and the next ones start to be blocked entirely. I believe a block prevents them from posting in threads you make anyways...
I'm posting here, so evidently not. I legitimately hope you don't have me on ignore, because it would be a pity for your "proof" that there is equivalence to be lost to me forever.

Also, I'd sincerely like you to know how much you assumed and how ironic it was that you did.

Yes, there are certainly terrible, sad people in the gaming community and yes as a mass, we are not seen as the most accepting or understanding.
You mean exactly my point? If we agree, where's the problem?

I spent forever trying to explain the reasons why that shit is the way it is and is perceived in the first place
And I don't buy it.

I'm sorry, is it the dissent that has us at loggerheads? Is it that I disagree, then?

The problem here is you aren't trying to present this as a case of understanding of why, rather just worthless complaining about the situation.
Actually, I'm pointing out what really needs to be addressed here. That's not complaining. I'd prefer it if you didn't editorialise any further.

You could go into geek culture's relation to gaming and how they influence each other. You could touch on why there is a growing sense of entitlement in culture itself and how that applies. You could make a case about how anonymity itself affects how people let themselves act and react to changes in a way they never would have before in the name of their fandom. Instead you made a post that paints you as some angry feminist caricature who's only addition to the conversation is sweeping generalizations and perpetuation of petty arguments when the whole damn point of the thread was to stay as far the fuck away from that shit as possible because how worthless it is.
In short, I could make a bunch of excuses.

If I am painted as an "angry feminist caricature," it is only by your hand.

To paraphrase Bill Maher, Martin Luther King did not say "I have a dream, but these sheriffs have a point in beating us."

This thread is about understanding
And yet, you approach dissent in the least understanding way possible.

If you were sincere, you could have approached this so much better.

Your personal complaints about culture as a whole are noted but wasted here.
They're wasted, but not because they're in this specific thread. They're wasted because people are still offering apologetics to a group whose standard is to discriminate and harass. You didn't even get my argument right, because you weren't listening. You are part of the problem, and I suspect that's why you're so angry.

Also, they're not my personal complaints. But why start using facts now?
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
runic knight said:
Yeah, what a brilliant insight that was explained 5 pages ago.
Again, if you're sincere, you're not being helpful at all. You should try it like this:

Maybe because they're not buying the games as much. Just a guess.
And why do you suppose that would be, Yuuki?

-or-

Yes, but why?

Or you could even ask the nature of the beast. Is it the chicken or the egg? Are women less interested in AAA gaming because it markets to males, or because they're simply not interested in gaming? Is it a self-fulfilling prophecy or is it an actual demographics issue?

To which my answer would be the former: that's why there are women who want in and feel cut off or left out. Women are discouraged from gaming both in an active sense as well as a passive one.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
shadowuser10141 said:
Phasmal said:
I didn't say anything about that. I do think perhaps your opinions and mine are not compatible on this, shit happens. It seems to bother you more than me. I'm not `threatening to leave the conversation`, I'll go when I like.
It doesn't bother me at all. I don't take multiplayer seriously and neither should you.
Saying our opinions are incompatible is very similar to we will agree to disagree.

Okay. Once again, I don't have a problem with that, I'm kinda trying to discuss the wider issues not just my personal experience, which, I repeat, is fine
That's an Xbox live study and I don't play Xbox.
The reason I talked about 13-year-olds is because a lot of them play CoD or Halo on Xbox and run their mouth to everyone.

Yeah, most people don't. But you can't really tell when someone will. Either way, it's just a small annoyance.
Besides, did you miss my linked study earlier that showed the amount of negative comments a female voice gets VS a male voice and no voice? Or did you just ignore it.
Clearly that shows that people kinda do care.
There is nothing we can do about trolls. Just mute them or go on another server.
Ok, enough of this shit.
We get it, the internet is full of assholes. Go back and you can reread that when I said was talking about anonymity. Congratulations, you have spent several replies now kicking a dead horse. Good job.

Now, if we are done with that, can we have an actual discussion on things? You know, like the points that have been raised about how to deal with the issue? Because I don't know about you, but I find it pretty shitty to put up with trolls in general. I don't like be associated with those assholes. Hell, when political forums are seen in a better light then gaming, it makes me think we aren't doing enough to address this. And it should be plainly damned apparent that we should want to do something.

So, with the motive to fix it and the understanding of the problem, lets hear some actual solutions. And protip, saying "toughen up" isn't a solution, that is being a lazy jackass. Funny thing is, this is pretty universal too. Doesn't even have to get into gender stuff, as trolls are something we should strive to do something about anyways.

Now, you did mention moderated servers. Good idea. But not everyone plays TF2 or can always find one that i moderated fairly. Would you say that perhaps a resource where you can go to find good servers for whatever game you want to play would be a good start to help minimize on trolling? Hell, we could make it multi-functional and have them ranked on quality, population, categorized by added mods, or even just list general rules? Would you have any sort of solution for this shit of your own that doesn't involve you trying to shout down the discussion? Because I should hope that in a thread calling for "Solutions" in the damn title, I would get some people with at least enough sense to provide better then "just deal with it".
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
shadowuser10141 said:
That's an Xbox live study and I don't play Xbox.
The reason I talked about 13-year-olds is because a lot of them play CoD or Halo on Xbox and run their mouth to everyone.
But not in equal measure. They're more likely to harass you if they think you're a minority of some sort.

That's kind of the problem.

And a specious argument would be simply not to play on those platforms, but console gaming is freaking huge business and it's unreasonable to indicate that women should have to change simply to avoid being treated worse.

Not to mention there's still games which are communication-heavy on PC as well. You have to cut out virtually entire genres to do so.

We grow so fond of our cages, don't we?
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
runic knight said:
Yeah, what a brilliant insight that was explained 5 pages ago.
Again, if you're sincere, you're not being helpful at all. You should try it like this:

Maybe because they're not buying the games as much. Just a guess.
And why do you suppose that would be, Yuuki?

-or-

Yes, but why?

Or you could even ask the nature of the beast. Is it the chicken or the egg? Are women less interested in AAA gaming because it markets to males, or because they're simply not interested in gaming? Is it a self-fulfilling prophecy or is it an actual demographics issue?

To which my answer would be the former: that's why there are women who want in and feel cut off or left out. Women are discouraged from gaming both in an active sense as well as a passive one.
I've been trying to do that. I have a low tolerance for putting up with stuff today, you'll have to excuse the tone I put things in until I can find my happy place and once again repeat myself time and again about stuff I have spelled out several times before. So, probably tomorrow after a good sleep.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
runic knight said:
I've been trying to do that. I have a low tolerance for putting up with stuff today, you'll have to excuse the tone I put things in until I can find my happy place and once again repeat myself time and again about stuff I have spelled out several times before. So, probably tomorrow after a good sleep.
If you have such low tolerance that you cannot handle any of this, you shouldn't be making threads like this, or demanding OTHER people be civil while you are unable to. I'm being more civil and you've resorted to stereotyping, swearing and yelling at me for how unfair I'm being.

Maybe you should request this thread be closed if you cannot handle things in a civil fashion.
 

Yuuki

New member
Mar 19, 2013
995
0
0
runic knight said:
The market strategies (darker, more violent, more attempts at being "mature" in order to try to fit demand from ->
The core targeted demographic
The habit of chasing what is the current biggest thing
The habit of choosing short term profit in spite of the concerns of the consumers.

I did go into why there isn't a bubble going to burst bit later on, in mentioning Nintendo as just one example. The main point was not that there was going to be some great crash because of lack of new players, rather, that the tactics themselves are crappy and have been seen before.
Hell, one could touch on the prominence of the internet alone to give free (if often uninspired) gaming to anyone looking as a reason why the gaming market itself wont ever burst. Though, the Triple A market on the other hand has shown a lot of signs of being forced to consolidate, closing down and combining at noteworthy rate, and that market is the one I was referring to as showing those parallels to comic industry of the 90's.

I gave an example of a trend that is parallel to the same trend that happened in comics. I never said there was no innovation (though I could make arguments about the value of the innovation we have been seeing with the new consoles, from the attempts microsoft has had to go back on to general failings of peripheral devices throughout gaming history). Say what you want about tunnel vision, you can at least see the point I was making about there being a trend, yes? And when you have some of the largest companies in the industry all driving for the same demographic and trying to repeat the same successes you have the parallel to the comic industry that I was trying to make there.
Aaah, we're specifically talking about the AAA market. Yeah they are in a bit of a pickle, but I believe they will adapt themselves to survive, they simply tailor themselves according to what sells and what doesn't, try a new thing here or there, etc.

Chasing the big thing is perfectly fine as long as they realize when it's no longer a big thing, and then find something new to chase. It's a perfectly sound strategy. Companies like EA and Activision aren't eager to die-out anytime soon. E.g. for the time being World Of Warcraft still holds 8 million subscribers and Call Of Duty is still a complete sell-out - that is the ONLY reason their respective companies are keeping those games going, because the market demand exists (i.e. guaranteed income).

runic knight said:
I meant that sarcastically, as a common complaint raised about comics in the 90's was that they often showed much more skin beforehand while trying to introduce more "mature" storylines or just generally more violent ones. That was my whole commentary there. Yes, it is of course pandering, but to who, again? Certainly not children. Would it be fair to call it pandering to a more physically mature audience? Would it be wrong to call such pandering an attempt to appear to align with a more mature audience, or ot put it shortly, an attempt to appear mature?
It depends what your take on "mature" is because that word has lost all meaning in recent times (like the words "criticism" and "opinion"). To me that word is no longer relevant when describing any demographic, it seems more immature when people desperately try to draw a line between what's mature and what isn't.
There are various consumers with various interests coming from various backgrounds, they come together to collectively form different demographics, and developers/publishers attempt to appeal to those demographics and sell their product.
I do not judge any demographic as being inferior to any other demographic, they all have an equal right to exist and be catered to.
No need to keep crow-barring the word "mature" in there. I like to keep things simple.

runic knight said:
Yeah, what a brilliant insight that was explained 5 pages ago. Would you care to try touching on why that is happening, or will you just lazily claim it is a simple market demand, as though that is the sole reason the market is shaped like it is now? You know, sort of the point of that huge ass post I started with and tried to keep the discussion on, that of understanding why shit is the way it is to better grasp if we should try to change it and if so, how we could go about it?
Sure thing.

Everyone makes an individual decision whether to buy something or not, and on a grand scale those decisions come together to form trends. Trends can be forcefully altered if enough individuals agree on something (something that goes against established trends obviously), form a unified stance and push together in a vast movement.

Tell me, is there something the gaming community agrees on something in a unified stance right now? Specifically a stance which goes against established trends, and is that community ready to make a movement? I can't think of anything at the moment.

If there truly is a vast untapped demographic of female gamers out there, the industry is yet to figure out how to appeal to them because even AAA games with well-portrayed female protagonists will be overwhelmingly played by males due to the AAA demographic being extremely male-dominated. Casual games are holding female gamers' interests for now and I see nothing wrong with different people being into different things - remember, individual decisions collectively forming trends. Developers/publishers can try and try out a line, but they're not going to keep pursuing it if females aren't biting back in decent numbers (and they're obviously not).

The entire reason trends form in the first place is because decisions are being made over a vast scale and people are unknowingly contributing to a unified stance (company CEO's will often give you a very different opinion about what they see from up there). Things have no reason to change unless they NEED to change - when enough people express the need, change will slowly occur and new trends will form. The cycle repeats. The AAA industry itself was something amazingly new and successful once upon a time (and still is successful for now), consumer demand created the AAA industry lest we forget.

So think again before you state that I'm "lazily claiming it is a simple market demand", there is weight/depth behind what I said and why I said it. The simplest answer to your "why did it happen?" question is this: Because enough people made individual decisions, and over a grand scale those decisions aligned to MAKE something happen.

Personally I don't care enough about the portrayal of fictional females (or tropes in fiction). I don't care about desperately luring more females into AAA gaming purely for the sake of having more females. I'll leave that decision completely in the hands of devs/publishers and their statisticians/analysts.
I have enough games to keep me busy for a while and great upcoming titles on the horizon (Battlefield 4!!).
So count me out as far as "pushing for change" goes :)
 

Specter Von Baren

Annoying Green Gadfly
Legacy
Aug 25, 2013
5,637
2,859
118
I don't know, send help!
Country
USA
Gender
Cuttlefish
runic knight said:
Specter Von Baren said:
By the way Runic Knight. I assume that, based on the title, this is just the first in a series of threads discussing this issue. So my question is, at what point will you feel we should move on to the next area of discussion and what will that area be about specifically?
Well, initially I thought about throwing the entire thing out at once, but after the first chunk on participation, I got tired and knew I had written more then most would bother to read anyways.

As for the next step, I don't know. Portrayal seems likely to be it, since it is being mentioned a lot to help increase participation, though I see far more pointless bickering going on just by daring to say "more women in games would be a good thing", since that brings jackasses of both sides running. Seriously "toughen up" and complaints about males in culture as a whole... what the hell?

Anyways, I would say as soon as any good idea comes out would be a good place to start, as it gets the ball rolling at least. I still stand behind the idea of a good and inexpensive games resource for newbies and a group through steam that is moderated. Small, but hell, might be a start, though I admit I am not the one to start it nor keep it running.
Hhm. Well then. Something I had thought up of over how a certain someone could have used a ton of money they received was, what if we tried setting up a country wide census of some sort. What if we had people volunteer to go out to public places and ask women to fill out a questionnaire? The questions would be something to the effect of.

Do you play video-games?

If so, what kind of games do you like?

If not, what kind of games would make you interested in playing video-games?

Then once the census is over, everyone would pool the results together, probably on a website, and we could figure out what games female gamers typically prefer, and we would figure out what kinds of games female non gamers would consider interesting enough to get them into gaming. Then we could post this on a site and show it to game developers. It would be a bit rough since it would be done in an unofficial capacity but it could at least get some numbers and data for game companies to look at capitalize on for the sake of getting money.

Basically, we give game companies a monetary reason to target the female demographic.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Took a half hour to give a point by point rebuttal, realized it was a waste of time after finalizing it. Instead, I'll give a simpler, shorter one.

I asked people to not make the issue a moral one nor to blame groups. I did this for the sake of the conversation in an attempt to avoid the same bullshit that ends every other thread. Your post represented the very ideas I wanted to avoid.

I don't care your opinion on sexism. I don't care your opinion on what causes it. I don't care your opinion on why gaming community is the way it is. That is all fine and worth debate in their own places.

I do care about avoiding derailing the thread by making remarks that blame the problem on a single gender. I don't care how right or wrong that may be in the end. I don't care if you can't tell the difference between "I want to keep peace for the sake of the conversation striving for solutions" and "both sides are equal, lol". I started this thread for a more informed and reasoned look into things, I am sorry if you can't respect that or just don't understand.

I am sorry I was harsher in tone then I needed to be.

I wanted to avoid the shallow blame game that undermines any attempt to solve the issues and instead turns it into a ideological proxy war. I wanted to avoid going into the larger social and cultural aspects that might affect the state of gaming because I knew that it was beyond the scope of the community here to find solutions for and it was a minefield easy to turn into a proxy war.

I want this thread to succeed. Please stay on topic. If all you have for an answer is to blame culture and other groups, then there is no point in you posting here. That does not address, inform or offer insight into the underlying reasons of the problem. It does not provide solutions that are practical or even within the scope of this community. It only derails the topic.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
runic knight said:
I've been trying to do that. I have a low tolerance for putting up with stuff today, you'll have to excuse the tone I put things in until I can find my happy place and once again repeat myself time and again about stuff I have spelled out several times before. So, probably tomorrow after a good sleep.
If you have such low tolerance that you cannot handle any of this, you shouldn't be making threads like this, or demanding OTHER people be civil while you are unable to. I'm being more civil and you've resorted to stereotyping, swearing and yelling at me for how unfair I'm being.

Maybe you should request this thread be closed if you cannot handle things in a civil fashion.

I'd rather people just listen when asked to not do things that could derail the larger conversation into the same petty arguments that litter every other thread on this topic and then act surprised when it gets a reaction.
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
Specter Von Baren said:
runic knight said:
Specter Von Baren said:
By the way Runic Knight. I assume that, based on the title, this is just the first in a series of threads discussing this issue. So my question is, at what point will you feel we should move on to the next area of discussion and what will that area be about specifically?
Well, initially I thought about throwing the entire thing out at once, but after the first chunk on participation, I got tired and knew I had written more then most would bother to read anyways.

As for the next step, I don't know. Portrayal seems likely to be it, since it is being mentioned a lot to help increase participation, though I see far more pointless bickering going on just by daring to say "more women in games would be a good thing", since that brings jackasses of both sides running. Seriously "toughen up" and complaints about males in culture as a whole... what the hell?

Anyways, I would say as soon as any good idea comes out would be a good place to start, as it gets the ball rolling at least. I still stand behind the idea of a good and inexpensive games resource for newbies and a group through steam that is moderated. Small, but hell, might be a start, though I admit I am not the one to start it nor keep it running.
Hhm. Well then. Something I had thought up of over how a certain someone could have used a ton of money they received was, what if we tried setting up a country wide census of some sort. What if we had people volunteer to go out to public places and ask women to fill out a questionnaire? The questions would be something to the effect of.

Do you play video-games?

If so, what kind of games do you like?

If not, what kind of games would make you interested in playing video-games?

Then once the census is over, everyone would pool the results together, probably on a website, and we could figure out what games female gamers typically prefer, and we would figure out what kinds of games female non gamers would consider interesting enough to get them into gaming. Then we could post this on a site and show it to game developers. It would be a bit rough since it would be done in an unofficial capacity but it could at least get some numbers and data for game companies to look at capitalize on for the sake of getting money.

Basically, we give game companies a monetary reason to target the female demographic.
Not a bad thought, but ultimately it is too flawed to be viable, at least in its current form. Many people do not know what they want until they experience it (see Jim's Perfect Pasta Sauce video.) and even those that do will lie in order to sound right (See Jim's talk on Coffee). The two together means that a survey would not be a very dependable gauge and most companies know this so they will instead use a more certain resource (sales data).

Still, not a bad start to try and show a demand in orde to try and get a supply started.