Women's breasts

[DanielBrown]

Well, if we were constantly exposed to breasts we probably wouldn't think as highly of them, don't you think?
There's something taboo about it that makes it all the more sweeter when you get your hands on some.

 

[thiosk]

I find the term "breasts" to be HIGHLY offensive.

Please, use the term GAZONGAS from now on.

Think of the children.

 

[Thaliur]

The timing could hardly have been better though:

Hah! Awesome.
Also:

Your find is even better :-D

 

[Jonluw]

Also:

Your find is even better :-D

"Women's breasts used 'Breast wave'!"
"Navy seals is paralyzed"

 

[5ilver]

Speaking as someone who has studied psychology in University, I've never seen proof that censorship of nudity is helpful to minors. It's just one of those things we do because otherwise we may end up in court where a bunch of sheep will send us to jail because We did not Uphold the "law".

Also, what do breasts have to do with sexuality anyway? Afaik, they're not used during the actual act of mating.

 

[SPARTAN-117]

You, sir, have just made my day

 

[Something Amyss]

Aside from anything else it's tremendously impractical for women to have such things completely unbound.

Depends on the size of the breasts and what the breasts' owner does in terms of activity.

Of course it does, but assuming that most women have a lifestyle that involves more than the mere preparation of sandwiches I think being covered up is best.

Oh, gee, women doing more than just making sammiches? Why didn't I think of that.

Oh wait, I did. And "covered" isn't necessarily better, especially when you think in terms of analogous situations. Come on.

 

[Dags90]

Oh, gee, women doing more than just making sammiches? Why didn't I think of that.

Oh wait, I did. And "covered" isn't necessarily better, especially when you think in terms of analogous situations. Come on.

I was specifically thinking of things like mowing the lawn and other yard work on a hot day. Obviously some women would like to have support for things like jogging, so their dangly bits aren't hitting them in face (I presume this is what happens).

Most guys are gonna want some support while jogging, but you don't need to have your bits swaddled in the summer heat when you're mowing the lawn and tidying up the yard.

 

[Jonluw]

I was specifically thinking of things like mowing the lawn and other yard work on a hot day. Obviously some women would like to have support for things like jogging, so their dangly bits aren't hitting them in face (I presume this is what happens).

[sub]Text: Conclusive proof that the sports-bra is a good invention.[/sub]​

People's interpretation of the OP confuses me.
I'm not arguing that women should let their breasts loose at all times and just generally walk around topless.
Clothes are practical, and I would like breasts to retain their eroticism.

What I'm arguing is that I think it's silly that you're allowed to look at as many breasts you want as an adult, but must be shielded from them at all costs during a certain period of your childhood.

 

[Spineyguy]

Aside from anything else it's tremendously impractical for women to have such things completely unbound.

Depends on the size of the breasts and what the breasts' owner does in terms of activity.

Of course it does, but assuming that most women have a lifestyle that involves more than the mere preparation of sandwiches I think being covered up is best.

Oh, gee, women doing more than just making sammiches? Why didn't I think of that.

Oh wait, I did. And "covered" isn't necessarily better, especially when you think in terms of analogous situations. Come on.

Another example of how being overly defensive can make even the most general of statements sound like a personal attack. Precisely what sort of activity do you think does not require at least a t-shirt (disregarding the obvious answer)?

 

[Something Amyss]

I was specifically thinking of things like mowing the lawn and other yard work on a hot day.

...You're kidding, right? No, seriously, are you kidding? Pklease tell me you are kidding.

 

[Something Amyss]

Another example of how being overly defensive can make even the most general of statements sound like a personal attack. Precisely what sort of activity do you think does not require at least a t-shirt (disregarding the obvious answer)?

So you say something ridiculous and the answer is immediately "defensive."

Come on...Be serious, dude. Why would most activities (most) for most women (most) REQUIRE at least a shirt?

Let's go from there.

 

[spartandude]

its not just boobs. nearly any kind of nudity seems to be prohibited as well as any mention of sex when a young one is concerned in wstern countries such as Britain or America
it seems to come from a train of thought that if a child is exposed to anything to do with sex they will obivously become a teengae parent or a serial rapist, ya know the exact opposite of what tends to happen in countries where children are educated or given knowlede about sex

 

[Easton Dark]

I kind of wish I wasn't exposed to them when I was, probably 4th grade?

Since that day, I've had an unending need to see as many as I can. It drives me mad sometimes.

 

[spartandude]

Its weird that total nudity isnt allowed either.

I see no reason why not. Children HAVE a gender. So hey already know what 50% of what they are looking at is. Whats the harm of learning the other side. Is life really so terrifying we need to keep children in purosefull ignorance of their own bodies? Things that will do no harm to them and are not disturbing or scaring in any way? Its a body. A person. You know what a human is. You ARE one. Perhaps sexuality is so repressed because we try and tell everyone its bad.

The netherlands has a VERY sexual liberal country. Lowest teen pregnancy rate in europe. Go figure.

i completely agree

 

[Creator002]

With regards to the censorship of man bits I think the funniest thing I have seen was the recent 'dildo' Diablo 3 story in Kotaku. The facebook comments were full of 'I don't want dildo's on my news feed!' from men. Whereas the hundreds of stories about half naked anime chicks is perfectly fine.

It's crazy how protective or disturbed men are about their own sexual organ whereas women are expected to put up with pictures of boobs being plastered everywhere, especially in gaming. I think it's pretty funny personally.

This just made me think of a funny inversion done by Rockstar. I don't remember seeing a single boob in any GTA 4 episode (including the main game), but there was full frontal male nudity (even if for just a few seconds) in The Lost and Damned.
I wonder how many gamers complained about that.

 

[BENZOOKA]

Um, okay. Well, this is where cultural differences come into play. In Finland, at least when I was a kid, and I don't think that's changed too much: no-one cares about 1-5 year olds seeing naked women, and that goes for 6-8-(or generally surely before puberty) ages, if it's like family/friends gatherings; sauna, and so on.

Then, at puberty, 12-13 and from there, females are generally the only thing in a teenager boy's mind. At least they were from me. And during that time, boobs and the vagina become like the holy grail. Then it kind of depends on the kid, whether he manages to find similarly hormonally-crazy girls who are willing to explore and share experiences in that area. I had my fair share of plenty of magnificent breasts during the teenage years. So it was merely the very beginning of puberty, when the wonders of women's breasts were hidden from me. And before teens, I didn't really care for them.

So I can't really see the point. Nudity isn't as much of a taboo here.

 

[Dags90]

...You're kidding, right? No, seriously, are you kidding? Pklease tell me you are kidding.

Why would I be kidding? Obviously they should wear sunscreen or if they're prone to sunburn or something.

People's interpretation of the OP confuses me.
I'm not arguing that women should let their breasts loose at all times and just generally walk around topless.
Clothes are practical, and I would like breasts to retain their eroticism.

What I'm arguing is that I think it's silly that you're allowed to look at as many breasts you want as an adult, but must be shielded from them at all costs during a certain period of your childhood.

I'm not sure how women going topless in public isn't relevant, seeing as they'd be seen by adults and children alike.

 

[Jonluw]

People's interpretation of the OP confuses me.
I'm not arguing that women should let their breasts loose at all times and just generally walk around topless.
Clothes are practical, and I would like breasts to retain their eroticism.

What I'm arguing is that I think it's silly that you're allowed to look at as many breasts you want as an adult, but must be shielded from them at all costs during a certain period of your childhood.

I'm not sure how women going topless in public isn't relevant, seeing as they'd be seen by adults and children alike.

Of course it's relevant, but more as a tangent.
What I find strange is that a lot of people reply saying only something like "dude, if women walked around topless all the time, boobs'd lose the magic".
It's relevant and all, but they don't seem to have noticed the main point.

General toplessness needn't be a consequence of us stopping our efforts to hide breasts from children.

 

[Spineyguy]

Another example of how being overly defensive can make even the most general of statements sound like a personal attack. Precisely what sort of activity do you think does not require at least a t-shirt (disregarding the obvious answer)?

So you say something ridiculous and the answer is immediately "defensive."

Come on...Be serious, dude. Why would most activities (most) for most women (most) REQUIRE at least a shirt?

Let's go from there.

I was making fun of the sexist jokes that have become popular on the internet recently. Now I'm confused as to whether you're taking exception to that because you think I'm serious, or I'm taking exception to you taking exception because I think you are serious.

Gravity has this affect on things that have at least some mass. Strenuous activities that may require rapid movement up and down (such as climbing stairs or running to catch a bus) will cause breasts to bounce in an uncoordinated and messy fashion, over time this will not only cause sagging, but may lead to injury. When carrying heavy loads, unclad breasts may prevent the woman's assuming of a safe lifting position, or become caught in between objects. Aside from this there are abrasions and numerous other injuries which, while easily avoidable with careful use of clothing, could cause pain, discomfort and inconvenience to the individual in question.

Basically, wearing clothes is sensible.