It's not that the blinking is a big deal. The big deal is the fact that the creators of the game made a stupid mistake which occurs in the very first minute of the game.xxhazyshadowsxx said:No doubt, it is bad game. I just never found the Blinking part to be that big of a deal.iain62a said:I played the demo on the xbox 360, and I have to say that I believe OP.xxhazyshadowsxx said:Oh come on.BlueSharkBoy said:The worst game I have EVER played is Alone In The Dark. It makes mistakes within the first minute. (SERIOUSLY) When you start, your in the first person vision of some guy who's name I couldn't care less about, your listening to 2 other guys who are apparently your enemies and for some reason your sight is ambushed by light quickly and to blink to clear your vision, you have to press L3 button.... every 2 FRICKING seconds. It's not annoying at first, but then it becomes annoying after about 10 seconds and then you really start wondering why the hell you have to blink every 1.8 seconds and who was stupid enough to force you to blink so often.
That whole scene is like 5 minutes total, and Is it really that big of a deal?
Tell you what: Fall asleep, and tell somebody to shine a light in your eyes to wake you up. You'll blink just as much as Edward. I agree about the game being stiff, but a 0.0/5? Come on, it deserves a 2 at the very least. I can't speak for the stiffness, because I played "Inferno" Which was the re-released version on the PS3 (Not a fanboy statement, it's the truth) which fixed alot of the bugs and control issues. But even then, I quickly grew tired of it.
OT: Superman 64.
It was a really horrendous game.
You forgot absolute tastelessness.Sewblon said:Army of Two. Graphics, brown, story, twisted parody of masculinity, game play, broken gears of war clone.
BlueSharkBoy said:The worst game I have EVER played is Alone In The Dark. It makes mistakes within the first minute. (SERIOUSLY) When you start, your in the first person vision of some guy who's name I couldn't care less about, your listening to 2 other guys who are apparently your enemies and for some reason your sight is ambushed by light quickly and to blink to clear your vision, you have to press L3 button.... every 2 FRICKING seconds. It's not annoying at first, but then it becomes annoying after about 10 seconds and then you really start wondering why the hell you have to blink every 1.8 seconds and who was stupid enough to force you to blink so often. After that, the gaming is stiff, you come across annoying voice acting from some women stuck in an elevator, and if you fail and die you go back to that place with her in it and are forced to listen to her bickering. You meet 2 idiots who you have to save from a fire and you are running away from something no one can even fricking see. The begining of the game is SO bad I didn't bother playing the rest of it.
Rating: 0.0/5
If you have played this game, let me know what you think of it.
Really have to agree with both of you. I sunk a few hours into each and the only happy moment that I can remember was when I realized that I had thankfully only rented alone in the dark and gotten two worlds really cheap.NeonZombie said:Two worlds is pretty fail
the tomb raider games are pretty good. i enjoyed Anniversary.wolfy098 said:Tomb raider games...
Because the gameplay isn't only bad but it only sells on the boobs
That's a shame to hear...I quite enjoyed Dark Crusade, despite the Necron factor.Christemo said:DoW2. it stinks so much, it destroyed the ENTIRE franchise.
second place goes to DMC3 PC version. because the Controls suck balls and the tutorial is shown on a PS2 controller. Dante, please stay on the consoles. im not saying DMC3 is a bad game on the ps2, im saying it sucks on the PC.
Dark Crusade was an awesome game, and Soulstorm made it only better. the first 2 wasnt very good (mainly because of lacking gameplay elements and extreme difficulty in the last maps of the campaign). i was excited about Tyranids too, but Relic has made a huge turd. many say its awesome, but after 10 minutes on the demo, i thought "fuck you Relic" and deleted the Demo and sweared never to buy the shit.dontworryaboutit said:That's a shame to hear...I quite enjoyed Dark Crusade, despite the Necron factor.Christemo said:DoW2. it stinks so much, it destroyed the ENTIRE franchise.
second place goes to DMC3 PC version. because the Controls suck balls and the tutorial is shown on a PS2 controller. Dante, please stay on the consoles. im not saying DMC3 is a bad game on the ps2, im saying it sucks on the PC.
And I got all excited about Tyranids...oh well.
I never bought it because a few months before release my computer decided life wasn't worth living anymore.Christemo said:Dark Crusade was an awesome game, and Soulstorm made it only better. the first 2 wasnt very good (mainly because of lacking gameplay elements and extreme difficulty in the last maps of the campaign). i was excited about Tyranids too, but Relic has made a huge turd. many say its awesome, but after 10 minutes on the demo, i thought "fuck you Relic" and deleted the Demo and sweared never to buy the shit.dontworryaboutit said:That's a shame to hear...I quite enjoyed Dark Crusade, despite the Necron factor.Christemo said:DoW2. it stinks so much, it destroyed the ENTIRE franchise.
second place goes to DMC3 PC version. because the Controls suck balls and the tutorial is shown on a PS2 controller. Dante, please stay on the consoles. im not saying DMC3 is a bad game on the ps2, im saying it sucks on the PC.
And I got all excited about Tyranids...oh well.
True Story, its a horrible gameChristemo said:DoW2. it stinks so much, it destroyed the ENTIRE franchise.