Worst Movie Evar!!! (Ever)

[setsunafseiei]

The upcoming Dragonball movie.
Recently, Role Models, I left half ways true it was that shite.

 

[TheFurryChicken]

The only movie I've ever almost walked out of the theater for: Napoleon Dynamite.

Dragon Wars also has a bit of a stink to it as well. When a friend of mine can start pointing to things and telling them to blow up... and they do, yeah, that's just bad.

 

[Gnomeking09]

ya ultra violet was shit i mean tooo sappy and too artsy

 

[RogueDarkJedi]

Every pokemon movie.

You have just made yourself a very powerful enemy, my friend.
*Pulls on cloak, cackles manaically and dives out nearby window*

Picks up his favorite magnum and a light saber. Plus some badass trenchcoat and sunglasses. Let's rock this shit.

 

[Fronken]

For me its a tie between 300 and Sin City.

Both of them just sucked balls, they didnt entertain me even a little bit, 300 for its extremely childish way of telling a story and its rampant use of Slow-motion, and Sin City for its annoying "art"style, generally bad acting and craptastic story, though it did include an armed hooker mob...that it does get some style points for.

They see me trollin' they hatin'

Yeah if you aren't trolling, you're officially the worst critic on this board.

For me? Blair Witch Project. Hell, it wasn't even a good student film, it should've never seen a major release.

So im a troll because i didnt like a couple of movies that you liked...?

Yes. Yes you are. I'd go into the reasons, but it's easier to just say that you are a troll because I say so.

You do know that the only one who's been trolling here is you, right?

So if i were you i'd look up what a troll is before you start to accuse others of being one, cause a troll blaiming others for trolling is nothing more than pathetic.

No, for me to be trolling I'd have to be trying to provoke a reaction from someone. I'm not doing that.

And I did leave another option for you if read the original post. I said in different words that if you weren't trolling then you have no taste in movies. So if you genuinely weren't trolling by claiming 300 and Sin City (very popular movies amongst our demographic which makes me think you were trying to provoke a reaction) belonged anywhere NEAR the list of "worst movies evar" and you actually believe that, then fine you aren't a troll. You're just tasteless.

Protip: what I'm doing is called flaming, it's what you call the reaction most trolls are trying to provoke. Learn your internet terminology!

Sorry but i honestly cant take advice from someone as arrogant as yourself, calling me tasteless just because i dont like the same movies you do isnt what i'd call professional in ANY sense of the word.

I hated Sin City and 300, that was my honest opinion, i wouldnt lie about it as all my friends know that i hated those movies, and dont call me tasteless when just about all my favourite movies have been voted in the top 100 on IMDB by 100.000+ people.

No, you misunderstand. I'm not offering advice. Advice would be telling you that you're better off not continuing in this conversation. I'm criticizing you and your "taste" in movies and to judge from other posts here, I'm not the only one.

Good day!

If you dont agree with my taste in movies, then why'd you even bother to try and argue about it?, cause according to hundreds of thousands of people (yes, 100.000+) i have good taste, and when it comes to having taste in movies, i kinda rely more on 100.000+ people on IMDB than on 1 arrogant person on a gaming forum, so calling my taste in movies bad AND using the fact that they are hyped as hell as an argument just shows how arrogant you are when it comes to movies, Face facts: Just because you love a movie doesnt make it perfect!, so dont be a ***** about it and just accept that you dont have the best taste in the world.

I love how seriously you're taking all this. At this point I'm only responding out of amusement.

Let's review a few things.

1.Arrogance
Ar"ro*gance\, n. [F., fr. L. arrogantia, fr. arrogans. See Arrogant.] The act or habit of arrogating, or making undue claims in an overbearing manner; that species of pride which consists in exorbitant claims of rank, dignity, estimation, or power, or which exalts the worth or importance of the person to an undue degree; proud contempt of others; lordliness; haughtiness; self-assumption; presumption.

If you read the definition, you'll note that a key point in said definition is that my statements must be self exalting or contain "exorbitant claims of rank, dignity, estimation."
My behavior is approaching arrogance, but isn't quite there yet, though the more I converse with you, the more convinced of my own superiority I become. The reason I say this is because this is an opinion forum. It is no more arrogant of me to disagree with your opinion and say so than it is for you to have one and say so. In fact the tone of your posts seems to be increasingly irritated that I dare to continue arguing with you. Seems to me that makes you considerably more arrogant than I.

You could argue that I displayed some arrogance in declaring you a troll because I said so, but in all honesty I didn't do that out of some sense of self importance, rather just because I didn't have time (or perhaps just the inclination) to type out why I thought you're a troll.

2. I am not calling you tasteless because you don't like the same movies I do. I am calling you tasteless because you grouped 300 and Sin City in with the likes of Uwe Boll films, Plan 9 from outerspace and Doom. Put simply, even if all your criticisms were valid (which they aren't, but forgetting that) they were still significantly better movies in production value, acting, music, directorship, writing and special effects than most of the movies this thread has listed.

3. As stated this is an opinion forum and I am completely within rights to criticize your opinion as you are completely within rights to criticize mine.

4. You should really try and take this all a little less seriously. Maybe go out and have some fun that doesn't involve posting on a forum. Honestly, you're far too worked up over a private little flame war. It isn't healthy. Go spend some time outside, or hanging around a member of the opposite sex. Smoke some weed, drink a beer, play a sport. Whatever. But really, the way you keep getting progressively more annoyed with each post? Not healthy.

5. You still don't have taste, but it's okay. Words on the internet can't hurt you unless you let them.

Is it really a suprise that i get more irritated with each post seeing as you keep insulting me even more for each post you make?

1: Production value, music, directorship, writing and special effects are all subjective, and just because You think they are at a higher level than Uwe Boll movies, that doesnt mean everyone will agree with you, and it certainly doesnt mean that your arguments are more valid.

2: You honestly dont call yourself arrogant?, lets see, so far you've called me: Troll, arrogant, Tasteless (even though there are 100000+ people agreeing with my taste only on IMDB), shut-in, and you've implied that i have no social life, which i highly doubt my girlfriend would agree on.

And the only one taking harm from this argument is you because you were the one who started it, i just replied to the thread with my honest opinion, i got 0 entertainment from either of them, they SUCKED, simple as that, no redeeming feature in any of them, If i were to be honest, i would actually rate Uwe boll movies higher because atleast they dont try to be serious, they are fun to watch because they are simply so bad, both Sin City and 300 are extremely serious about themselfs which only cripples them both.

So to keep myself short and to try and get you to stop spamming me with inconsiquensial shit like quotes from dictionairies:

If you dont agree with my opinion, good for you, you dont have to be a ***** about it and throw out 20+ lines of text arguing that your opinion is more valid than that of mine, because it isnt, and no matter how big you make your text blocks your not gonna make anyone think otherwise, so just let it go...

 

[jthm]

For me its a tie between 300 and Sin City.

Both of them just sucked balls, they didnt entertain me even a little bit, 300 for its extremely childish way of telling a story and its rampant use of Slow-motion, and Sin City for its annoying "art"style, generally bad acting and craptastic story, though it did include an armed hooker mob...that it does get some style points for.

They see me trollin' they hatin'

Yeah if you aren't trolling, you're officially the worst critic on this board.

For me? Blair Witch Project. Hell, it wasn't even a good student film, it should've never seen a major release.

So im a troll because i didnt like a couple of movies that you liked...?

Yes. Yes you are. I'd go into the reasons, but it's easier to just say that you are a troll because I say so.

You do know that the only one who's been trolling here is you, right?

So if i were you i'd look up what a troll is before you start to accuse others of being one, cause a troll blaiming others for trolling is nothing more than pathetic.

No, for me to be trolling I'd have to be trying to provoke a reaction from someone. I'm not doing that.

And I did leave another option for you if read the original post. I said in different words that if you weren't trolling then you have no taste in movies. So if you genuinely weren't trolling by claiming 300 and Sin City (very popular movies amongst our demographic which makes me think you were trying to provoke a reaction) belonged anywhere NEAR the list of "worst movies evar" and you actually believe that, then fine you aren't a troll. You're just tasteless.

Protip: what I'm doing is called flaming, it's what you call the reaction most trolls are trying to provoke. Learn your internet terminology!

Sorry but i honestly cant take advice from someone as arrogant as yourself, calling me tasteless just because i dont like the same movies you do isnt what i'd call professional in ANY sense of the word.

I hated Sin City and 300, that was my honest opinion, i wouldnt lie about it as all my friends know that i hated those movies, and dont call me tasteless when just about all my favourite movies have been voted in the top 100 on IMDB by 100.000+ people.

No, you misunderstand. I'm not offering advice. Advice would be telling you that you're better off not continuing in this conversation. I'm criticizing you and your "taste" in movies and to judge from other posts here, I'm not the only one.

Good day!

If you dont agree with my taste in movies, then why'd you even bother to try and argue about it?, cause according to hundreds of thousands of people (yes, 100.000+) i have good taste, and when it comes to having taste in movies, i kinda rely more on 100.000+ people on IMDB than on 1 arrogant person on a gaming forum, so calling my taste in movies bad AND using the fact that they are hyped as hell as an argument just shows how arrogant you are when it comes to movies, Face facts: Just because you love a movie doesnt make it perfect!, so dont be a ***** about it and just accept that you dont have the best taste in the world.

I love how seriously you're taking all this. At this point I'm only responding out of amusement.

Let's review a few things.

1.Arrogance
Ar"ro*gance\, n. [F., fr. L. arrogantia, fr. arrogans. See Arrogant.] The act or habit of arrogating, or making undue claims in an overbearing manner; that species of pride which consists in exorbitant claims of rank, dignity, estimation, or power, or which exalts the worth or importance of the person to an undue degree; proud contempt of others; lordliness; haughtiness; self-assumption; presumption.

If you read the definition, you'll note that a key point in said definition is that my statements must be self exalting or contain "exorbitant claims of rank, dignity, estimation."
My behavior is approaching arrogance, but isn't quite there yet, though the more I converse with you, the more convinced of my own superiority I become. The reason I say this is because this is an opinion forum. It is no more arrogant of me to disagree with your opinion and say so than it is for you to have one and say so. In fact the tone of your posts seems to be increasingly irritated that I dare to continue arguing with you. Seems to me that makes you considerably more arrogant than I.

You could argue that I displayed some arrogance in declaring you a troll because I said so, but in all honesty I didn't do that out of some sense of self importance, rather just because I didn't have time (or perhaps just the inclination) to type out why I thought you're a troll.

2. I am not calling you tasteless because you don't like the same movies I do. I am calling you tasteless because you grouped 300 and Sin City in with the likes of Uwe Boll films, Plan 9 from outerspace and Doom. Put simply, even if all your criticisms were valid (which they aren't, but forgetting that) they were still significantly better movies in production value, acting, music, directorship, writing and special effects than most of the movies this thread has listed.

3. As stated this is an opinion forum and I am completely within rights to criticize your opinion as you are completely within rights to criticize mine.

4. You should really try and take this all a little less seriously. Maybe go out and have some fun that doesn't involve posting on a forum. Honestly, you're far too worked up over a private little flame war. It isn't healthy. Go spend some time outside, or hanging around a member of the opposite sex. Smoke some weed, drink a beer, play a sport. Whatever. But really, the way you keep getting progressively more annoyed with each post? Not healthy.

5. You still don't have taste, but it's okay. Words on the internet can't hurt you unless you let them.

Is it really a suprise that i get more irritated with each post seeing as you keep insulting me even more for each post you make?

1: Production value, music, directorship, writing and special effects are all subjective, and just because You think they are at a higher level than Uwe Boll movies, that doesnt mean everyone will agree with you, and it certainly doesnt mean that your arguments are more valid.

2: You honestly dont call yourself arrogant?, lets see, so far you've called me: Troll, arrogant, Tasteless (even though there are 100000+ people agreeing with my taste only on IMDB), shut-in, and you've implied that i have no social life, which i highly doubt my girlfriend would agree on.

And the only one taking harm from this argument is you because you were the one who started it, i just replied to the thread with my honest opinion, i got 0 entertainment from either of them, they SUCKED, simple as that, no redeeming feature in any of them, If i were to be honest, i would actually rate Uwe boll movies higher because atleast they dont try to be serious, they are fun to watch because they are simply so bad, both Sin City and 300 are extremely serious about themselfs which only cripples them both.

So to keep myself short and to try and get you to stop spamming me with inconsiquensial shit like quotes from dictionairies:

If you dont agree with my opinion, good for you, you dont have to be a ***** about it and throw out 20+ lines of text arguing that your opinion is more valid than that of mine, because it isnt, and no matter how big you make your text blocks your not gonna make anyone think otherwise, so just let it go...

Before I get into anything else, I'm going to stop posting in this thread after this. If you want to continue this little flame war, that's fine, I'm getting a kick out of it and I don't have anything in particular to do for another hour or two. No, I want to stop posting it here because we've each said as much as can be said about 300 and Sin City (movies were so good) and our little dispute isn't relevant to this thread anymore.

NOW, that said.

I never claimed you were a shut in. You saw the movies so clearly you go out sometimes, either to a theater or a rental place. I just implied you've spent too much time and effort on this thread in particular and are getting entirely to worked up about the words of someone you don't even know. Calm your ass down, each of your posts sounds more and more childish and I suspect it's because you're angry, not because you're a child. Good lord, you even use the expression "you were the one who started it." I'd say that, if nothing else validates my assertion that you're taking this way too seriously and a little time away from the computer would do you some good. Have your alleged girlfriend read these, I bet she'd agree. (I say alleged because I don't outright disbelieve you have a girlfriend, but because this isn't the first time I've heard that from someone on an internet forum in this exact same situation before. I'm not saying she doesn't exist, just saying I'm not taking your word for it. Noting personal, just think of it as being like an agnostic view of God).

By the way, you mis-spelled inconsequential and my dictionary.com quote (you didn't spell dictionary right either) was anything but. You called me arrogant, I used the definition to debunk your insinuation and then apply it to you. Also "spamming" you with dictionary definitions implies I did it more than once. So far I haven't. So that's wrong too.

Now, who's taking harm from this? I'm sitting here smiling to myself at your misplaced and ineffectual internet rage. You're getting angry. I'm amused, you're angry. Of the two, I'd say the more harmful state of mind is anger. But like I said, I'm all for keeping this going, just not in this thread. PM me if you want to rant back, like I said I've got time to kill.

Last point. I never said your opinion was less valid than mine either. I just disagreed with your opinion. That's sort of the whole point of a DISCUSSION BOARD. We offer up opinions, agree or disagree with one another and, you know... DISCUSS.

 

[Ghost]

the remake of the wicker man with Nicolas cage and stay alive

edit: what's up with the spam fest up above?

 

[gbaker3]

Definitely Battlefield Earth.

 

[jthm]

the remake of the wicker man with Nicolas cage and stay alive

edit: what's up with the spam fest up above?

Nothin' man, it's over, at least here. Other user doesn't like that I disagree with him.

 

[deleted_scifidownbeat]

DELETED

 

[axelmaxima]

street fighter the legend of chun lee!!! this movie is so bad you have to see it to believe how bad it is!

 

[Lord Beautiful]

The Crow: Wicked Prayer

Helen Keller is a better marksman than Edward Furlong is a Crow.

 

[McNinja]

Rocky Horror Picture show. That movie is so freakin weird. The plot is not there, it goes from the two on a trip to the creation of rocky Horror (if that's the creations name, I never could figure it out), then skips to their transformations into transvestites, then aliens... i guess it makes sense, in a sort of over arching, pointless kind of way. It's one of my friends favorite movies and i don't know hows she's gone to see it upwards of 15 times and paid $5 to see it. I've gone twice, and it's not really that good.

 

[Yokomitsu]

Gladiator. Russel Crowe is just awful.

Obviously someone has no taste in movies, as this movie was one of the best movies and is still classed as one of the best.

 

[AbsoluteVirtue18]

Gladiator. Russel Crowe is just awful.

......How dare you.

The Final Sacrifice. The only good thing about the movie was Zapp Rowsdower.

Look up "Rowdower" on Youtube. Funny.

 

[milesrose]

Strange Wilderness is the worst. BLEEEEEEH

 

[orangebandguy]

Meet the Spartans, or Blair Witch Project.

 

[xChevelle24]

Not to be offensive to anyone here, but some of you (maybe not some, but a couple) are terrible movie critics.

Judging whether a movie is bad/good just purely off of personal like/dislike is, in my opinion, ignorant. The

The worst movie ever made is probably a movie that none of us have even heard of, and not a movie that hollywood spent millions (if not billions) making.

300 was a bad movie for the slow-mo and childish way of telling a story? Okay, so be it, but I thought it was hollywood's job to make things interesting and appealing to audiences? Or was that lost in the translation somewhere? I thought 300 was a superb movie, even after the 45th time I watched it.

And to all the critics of the scary movie sequels, I admit, some of them were pretty bad; but I enjoyed Meet The Spartans (probably next to Epic Movie, the most hated here), particularly because I enjoyed 300 and I understood what they were making fun of.

Back on topic though:

I thought Saving Private Ryan was bad, I mean Tom Hanks as the lead character, you must be joking! And the joke about the girls breasts while they're listening to the french woman sing before the final battle, BLASHPAMY!!! There was no joke-making in WWII! /sarcasm

Also, Phonebooth was just as terrible, I mean Colin Ferell(sp?) being harassed by a guy while inside of a phonebooth, that's just so unoriginal that I can't even begin to explain. Just a terrible movie with a terrible plot. Again, /sarcasm.

Anyways, my vote from personal preference of worst movie (that I have seen) would be Max Payne. And maybe my judgement on this is because I never read the comics, but anyways I just thought the plot was a little sped up, and by sped up I mean fed crack and then fast-forwarded on TiVo by 24x the normal speed. First you meet Max, then like 2 scenes later he's already like killing people. You never really know why, you know really get the full experience into the plot that I was expecting. Overall, I was just disappointed in this movie.

 

[ehnhander joker]

Street Fighter the Legend of Chung Li. Imagine a piece of cinematic entertainment that is so dreadful that its damn near unwatchable by anyone who is not mentally retarded.(The 1995 Street Fighter Film) Now imagine that that same piece of entertainment got genetically enhanced to become more terrible and unwatchable than it previously was and you end up with this film. All jokes aside this is one of if not the worst film to ever make it to the big screen.